Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12358 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 May, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF MAY 2021 / 17TH VAISAKHA, 1943
Bail Appl..No.3330 OF 2021
CRIME NO.424/2021 OF Chadayamanagalam Police Station , Kollam
PETITIONER/ACCUSED :-
REENA SHAMSUDEEN
AGED 39 YEARS
CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU,
AYOOR P.O, EDAMULACKAL VILLAGE,
KOLLAM, PIN - 691306
BY ADVS.
SRI.K.SIJU
SMT.S.SEETHA
SMT.ANJANA KANNATH
RESPONDENTS :-
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ERNAKULAM - 682031
2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER
CHADAYAMANGALAM POLICE STATION,
KOLLAM, PIN - 691534
P.P.SMT.M.K.PUSHPALATHA
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
07.05.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
--------------------------------
B.A.No.3330 of 2021
-------------------------------
Dated this the 7th day of May, 2021
ORDER
This Bail Application filed under Section 438 of Criminal
Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) was heard through Video Conference.
2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.424/2021 of
Chatayamangalam Police Station. The above case is registered
against the petitioner alleging offences punishable under Sections
294(b), 323 IPC and Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and
Protection) Act 2015.
3. The prosecution case is that on 15.1.2021, while the
defacto complainant and her husband were in altercation and when
their daughter, the victim aged 13 years intervened, the accused
who was present in the house of the husband of the defacto
complainant pushed her daughter and showered filthy language
against her.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. The counsel for the petitioner
submitted that it is a false case foisted against the petitioner at the
instance of the husband of the petitioner. The counsel submitted
that even if the entire allegations are accepted no offence as
alleged against the petitioner is made out. The counsel submitted
that the petitioner is ready to abide any conditions if this Court
grant her bail. The Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.
5. After hearing both sides, I think this bail application can
be allowed on stringent conditions. Custodial interrogation of the
petitioner may not be necessary in the facts and circumstances of
the case. I have already granted bail to the petitioner in another
crime today as per order in B.A. No.3325/2021. Considering the
facts and circumstances of the case, I think, bail can be granted in
this case also.
6. Moreover, the 2nd wave of COVID-19 is spreading in the
country and the citizens are facing serious difficulties. In the state
of Kerala, the 2nd wave of the pandemic is creating lot of problems
and even the day-to-day life of the citizens are affected. Everyday,
about 25,000 people are tested positive with COVID-19. In such
circumstances, this Court has to consider this fact also while
considering bail applications. The life is more important than
anything. Therefore, I am considering this bail application based on
the above pandemic situation.
7. Moreover, considering the need to follow social
distancing norms inside prisons so as to avert the spread of the
novel Corona Virus Pandemic, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Re:
Contagion of COVID-19 Virus In Prisons case (Suo Motu Writ
Petition(C) No.1 of 2020) and a Full Bench of this Court in
W.P(C)No.9400 of 2020 issued various salutary directions for
minimizing the number of inmates inside prisons. These happened
during the 1st wave of COVID-19 season.
8. Moreover, it is a well accepted principle that, the bail is
the rule and the jail is the exception. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Chidambaram P. v. Directorate of Enforcement (2019 (16)
SCALE 870), after considering all the earlier judgments, observed
that, the basic jurisprudence relating to bail remains the same
inasmuch as the grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the
exception so as to ensure that, the accused has the opportunity of
securing fair trial.
9. Considering the dictum laid down in the above decision
and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Bail
Application is allowed with the following directions:
1. The petitioner shall appear before the
Investigating Officer within three weeks from
today and shall undergo interrogation;
2. After interrogation, if the Investigating Officer proposes to arrest the petitioner, she shall
be released on bail executing a bond for a sum of
Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two
solvent sureties each for the like sum to the
satisfaction of the officer concerned;
3. The petitioner shall appear before the
Investigating Officer for interrogation as and
when required. The petitioner shall co-operate
with the investigation and shall not, directly or
indirectly make any inducement, threat or
promise to any person acquainted with the facts
of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing
such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
4. The petitioner shall not leave India
without permission of the Court;
5. The petitioner shall not commit any
offence similar to the offence alleged in this case.
6. The petitioner shall strictly abide by
the various guidelines issued by the State
Government and Central Government with
respect to keeping of social distancing in the
wake of Covid 19 pandemic;
7. If any of the above conditions are violated by the petitioner, the jurisdictional Court
can cancel the bail in accordance to law, even
though the bail is granted by this Court.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE
al/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!