Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9911 Ker
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2021
IA/1/2021 IN Con.Case(C) 187/2020 1/4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Present:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
Wednesday,the 24th day of March 2021/3rd Chaithra, 1943
IA.1/2021 IN Contempt Case(C)No.187/2020 (S) in WP(C) No.3915/2018
PETITIONER/PETITIONER
For information purpose only
N.M. SIRAJUDEEN,
S/O.NAINAR MUHAMMED, AGED 60 YEARS,
FINANCE MANAGER, (RETIRED), HANTEX PROCESS HOUSE,
PAPPANAMCODE, KERALA STATE HANDLOOM WEAVERS
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.H 232, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
RESIDING AT T.C.49/620(2), MRWA 61-A, MALLIYIDOM,
MANACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 009.
RESPONDENTS/FIRST AND SECOND RESPONDENTS
1. K.S. ANILKUMAR, AGED 49 YEARS, MANAGING DIRECTOR,
KERALA STATE HANDLOOM WEAVERS CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETY LTD.NO.H 232, OOTTUKUZHI,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001, RESIDING AT
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. SRI.S. RADHINDRAN, AGED 55 YEARS, THE PRESIDENT,
THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF KERALA STATE HANDLOOM
WEAVERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.H 232, OOTTUKUZHI,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001, RESIDING AT KARTHIK,
T.C.5/1613, AMBALAMUKKU, PEEROORKKADA P.O., TRIVANDRUM.
Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit
filed therewith the High Court be pleased to initiate contempt proceedings
as per the memo of charges.
This application coming on for orders upon perusing the application and
the affidavit filed in support thereof, and this Court's judgment dated
12/02/2020 and upon hearing the arguments of SRI.P.N.MOHANAN, Advocate for
the petitioner in IA/COC and of SRI.N.RAGHURAJ, Advocate for the
respondents in IA/COC, the court passed the following:
IA/1/2021 IN Con.Case(C) 187/2020 2/4
ANNEXURE R1(a): TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF ORDER DATED 05/03/2021.
For information purpose only
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, J.
--------------------------------------------------
I.A.No.1/2021 in COC No.187 of 2020
--------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 24th day of March, 2021
O R D E R
For information purpose only When this matter was called today, learned
counsel for the respondents - Sri.N.Reghuraj,
submitted that Annexure-R1(a) has been produced
on record in compliance with the directions in
the judgment.
Sri.P.N.Mohanan - learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner, however, submitted that an
amount of Rs.81,879/- has been withheld and prays
that further action under the Contempt of Courts
Act be proceeded against the respondents.
Sri.N.Reghuraj responded to this saying that
the submissions of the petitioner as above are
not correct and that the entire amounts have
already been paid to the petitioner.
In such circumstances, I am afraid that I
cannot accede to the afore request of
Sri.P.N.Mohanan because, the question of COC 187/20
retention of amounts by the respondents, if
any, is an issue that will require to be
considered by an appropriate forum, after
For information purpose only evaluation of various factors.
In the afore circumstances, I close this
I.A. recording the submission of Sri.N.
Reghuraj that Annexure-R1(a) order has been
issued; however, leaving liberty to the
petitioner to invoke every other remedy for the
balance amounts, if any, as per law.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, RR/24.03.2021 JUDGE
/true copy/ Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!