Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S.Ranbaxy Labs Ltd vs M/S.Ranbaxy Labs Ltd
2021 Latest Caselaw 9804 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9804 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2021

Kerala High Court
M/S.Ranbaxy Labs Ltd vs M/S.Ranbaxy Labs Ltd on 23 March, 2021
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS

                                  &

                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU

     TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 2ND CHAITHRA, 1943

                        WA.No.1690 OF 2011
  AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 3415/2005 DATED 02-09-2011 OF HIGH
                         COURT OF KERALA


APPELLANT/1ST RESPONDENT:

              M/S.RANBAXY LABS LTD
              25, NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHI,
              REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER (PERSONNEL).

              BY ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR

RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER/2ND RESPONDENT:

         1    SHRI.GEORGE JOSEPH
              MANGALASSERIL HOUSE, VADAVATHOOR P.O.,
              KOTTAYAM-686 010.

         2    THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL,
              ALAPPUZHA

              SRI.SAIGI JACOB PALATTY, SR.GOVT.PLEADER

     THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23.03.2021, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.A No.1690 of 2011
                                         2

               ALEXANDER THOMAS & K.BABU, JJ.
                      ===========================
                             W.A No.1690 of 2011
                      [arising out of the judgment dated 02.09.2011
                                 in W.P(C) No.3415/2005]
                      ===========================
                         Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2021

                                   JUDGMENT

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.

This Court had ordered on 01.07.2020 in I.A No.1/2020 in the

above writ appeal that notices to additional respondents 3 & 4, who are

sought to be impleaded in the writ appeal to be issued. The above writ

appeal has been filed as early as on 20.10.2011.

2. Now the Registry has endorsed that notices to respondents

3 & 4 could not be sent, as the process filed was with insufficient

stamps.

In view of the abovesaid aspects, it is ordered that the above Writ

Appeal will stand dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE

Sd/-

K.BABU, JUDGE vgd

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter