Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9655 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 2ND CHAITHRA, 1943
Crl.MC.No.8032 OF 2018(D)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 301/2015 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS
MAGISTRATE COURT, CHOTTANIKKARA
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
SASI, AGED 42 YEARS,
S/O KUTTAPAN, PLAKKIYIL HOUSE,
KOKKAPALLY, THIRUVANIYOOR VILLAGE.
BY ADVS.
SRI.M.REVIKRISHNAN
SRI.VIPIN NARAYAN
RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE:
1 DAVID, AGED 81 YEARS,
S/O PATHROSE, THOPPIL HOUSE,
KODUMBOOR KARA, KOKKAPPILLY,
THIRUVANIYOOR VILLAGE,
PIN- 680305
2 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682031.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW ABRAHAM (OLIYIL)
R1 BY ADV. SRI.R.SAJEEV
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RAMESH CHAND
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
23.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No.8032 OF 2018(D) 2
ORDER
The imputation contained in a complaint
submitted before the Home Minister against the
first respondent taken as a ground to extend
criminal liability under Section 500 IPC by lodging
a complaint before the concerned Magistrate, over
which cognizance was taken, which is under
challenge. There is no publication. Hence, it
would squarely come under the purview of 8th
Exception to Section 499 IPC. It will not serve
any purpose if it is proceeded further and would be
an abuse of process of the court. The complaint
and the cognizance taken thereof hence is quashed.
Crl.M.C. is allowed accordingly.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN
JUDGE
msp
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S ANNEXURE:
ANNEXURE-A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE, CHOTTANIKKARA.
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURE:NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!