Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9528 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 March, 2021
RSA 1025/2019 1/6
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Present:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR
Monday,the 22nd day of March 2021/1st Chaithra, 1943
IA.1/2019 IN RSA.1025/2019 (E)
A.S No.59/2014 of the ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-I,MAVELIKKARA
For information purpose only
O.S No.274/2004 of the SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA
PETITIONER/APPELLANT:
KOYAKUTTY ABDULLAKUTTY,AGED 60 YEARS
S/O.KOYAKUTTY, KALEEKALTHARAYIL VEEDU, CHERAVALLY MURI,
KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY DISTRICT
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1. SAINABA KUNJU,AGED 72 YEARS
W/O.LATE P.K.YOUSEF KUTTY, RESIDING AT PUTHEN VEEDU,
PERUNGALA, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY DISTRICT-690537
2. SHANITHA,AGED 47 YEARS
D/O.SAINABA KUNJU, KANDATHIL HOUSE, VANDANAM P.O,
AMBALAPUZHA VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA, RESIDING AT PUTHEN VEEDU,
PERUNGALA, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY DISTRICT-690537
3. NIZA,AGED 45 YEARS
D/O.SAINABA KUNJU, RESIDING AT PUTHEN VEEDU, PERUNGALA,
KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY DISTRICT-690537
4. NEZI,AGED 41 YEARS
D/O.SAINABA KUNJU, RESIDING AT PUTHEN VEEDU, PERUNGALA,
KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY DISTRICT-690537
5. BINDU,AGED 33 YEARS
D/O.SAINABA KUNJU, SHAHITHA MANZIL, KOOTTIKADA.P.O,
ERAVIPURAM VILLAGE, RESIDING AT PUTHEN VEEDU, PERUNGALA,
KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY DISTRICT-690537
6. KOYAKUTTY AHAMMEDKUTTY,AGED 57 YEARS
S/O.AHAMMEDKUTTY, VARIKOLIL PUITHENVEEDU, PERUNGALA MURI,
KAYAMKULAM VILLAGE, ALLEPPY DISTRICT-690537
7. KHADEEJAKUNJU SHEREEFA,AGED 74 YEARS
KANNANKARA KIZHAKATHIL, PERUNGALA MURI, KAYAMKULAM,
KOCHUTHEKETHIL, PERUNGALA MURI, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY
RSA 1025/2019 2/6
DISTRICT-690537
8. MOHAMMED BASHEER
KALEEKAL HOUSE, CHERUVALLY MURI, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPY
DISTRICT-690502
9. ABDUL LATHEEF,
KALEEKAL HOUSE, CHERUVALLY MURI, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY
For information purpose only
DISTRICT-690502
10. RAMLA
KALAVELIL PADEETTATHIL MADRASA WARD, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY
DISTRICT-690502
11. SAFIYATHU
KALEEKAL HOUSE, CHERUVALLY MURI, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY
DISTRICT-690502
12. ABDUL UMMARKUTTY
KALEEKAL HOUSE, CHERUVALLY MURI, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY
DISTRICT-690502
13. ABDUL RASHEED,
KALEEKAL HOUSE, CHERUVALLY MURI, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY
DISTRICT-690502
14. HUSSAIN UMMERKUTTY
KALEEKAL HOUSE, CHERUVALLY MURI, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY
DISTRICT-690502
15. NAZIYATH
KALEEKAL HOUSE, CHERUVALLY MURI, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY
DISTRICT-690502
16. AMBILI
KALEEKAL HOUSE, CHERUVALLY MURI, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY
DISTRICT-690502
17. NADEERA
KALEEKAL HOUSE, CHERUVALLY MURI, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY
DISTRICT-690502
18. SABIATH
RSA 1025/2019 3/6
KALEEKAL THARAYIL, CHERUVALLY MURI, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY
DISTRICT-690502
19. SAINABA
KALEEKALTHARAYIL , CHERUVALLY MURI, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY
DISTRICT-690502
20. RAMLATH
For information purpose only
KALEEKAL THARAYIL, CHERUVALLY MURI, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY
DISTRICT-690502
21. SAMAD
KALEEKAL THARAYIL, CHERUVALLY MURI, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY
DISTRICT-690502
22. SULAIMAN KUNJU
KALEEKAL THARAYIL, CHERUVALLY MURI, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY
DISTRICT-690502
23. RAZER, S.H MANZIL
CHERUVALLY MURI, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY DISTRICT-690502
24. SAIDTH
KALEEKAL THARAYIL, CHERUVALLY MURI, KAYAMKULAM, ALLEPPY
DISTRICT-690502
Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit
filed therewith the High Court be pleased to stay all further proceedings
pursuant to the judgment and decree rendered by the courts below in
AS.No.59 of 2014 on the file of the Additional District Court-I, Mavelikkara
dated 24.07.2019 and in OS.No.274 of 2004 on the file of the Sub Court,
Mavelikkara dated 11.04.2014 pending consideration of the above appeal
in the interest of justice.
This application coming on for orders upon perusing the application
and the affidavit filed in support thereof, and upon hearing the
arguments of M/s. G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) and RENJIT GEORGE,
Advocates for the petitioner and of Sri. R.RAMADAS, Advocate for
respondents 1 to 5, Sri.RAPHAEL THEKKAN, Advocate for the respondents
RSA 1025/2019 4/6
6, 8 to 17, 21 and 24, the court passed the following:
For information purpose only
N. ANIL KUMAR, J.
-------------------------------------------
R.S.A No.1025 of 2019
-------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of March, 2021.
For information
O R Dpurpose
ER only
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and
learned Senior Counsel for the respondents 1 to 5. This
Regular Second Appeal is admitted on the following
substantial questions of law.
1) Was it justified on the part of the courts below in not
finding that in the light of Exts.A7, A9, A11 and A10
where definite findings are there that the plaintiffs in
that suit have got independent right in the property
and such findings merged with the decree, is it not a
case where the plea raised on the same title stands
barred by the general principles of res-judicata ?
2) Is it not a case where when an issue between the
parties stands determined and it operates as
estoppel in a subsequent proceedings ?
I.A.No.1 of 2019
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and
learned Senior Counsel for the respondents 1 to 5. R.S.A No.1025 of 2019
Both parties are directed to maintain status quo as
reported by the Commissioner in Ext.C3(a) for a period of three
months.
For information purpose only R.S.A
Issue notice to respondents 6 to 24.
Call for the records.
Post after summer vacation.
Sd/-
N.ANIL KUMAR JUDGE
DK
/true copy/ Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!