Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jobi P.G. vs The Union Of India
2021 Latest Caselaw 9298 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9298 Ker
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2021

Kerala High Court
Jobi P.G. vs The Union Of India on 19 March, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

     FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 28TH PHALGUNA, 1942

                       WP(C).No.7112 OF 2021(L)


PETITIONERS:

      1        JOBI P.G., AGED 42 YEARS
               S/O. GEORGE P.K, PADINJARETHALA HOUSE, KURIACHIRA
               P.O, PUSHPAGIRI ROAD, VALARKAVU, THRISSUR - 06.

      2        SAJAN K R, AGED 36 YEARS
               S/O. RAMDAS K.V, KOZHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, VADOOKARA P.O,
               S.N. NAGAR, KOORCKANCHERY, THRISSUR - 680007.

      3        GEO MICHAEL C., AGED 33 YEARS
               S/O. LATE MICHAEL, CHIRAMEL HOUSE, ROSE GARDEN,
               CHIYYARAM SOUTH, MUNAYAM, THRISSUR - 26.

      4        NAVEEN P.V., AGED 38 YEARS
               S/O. VASUDEVAN P.K, PULLUNDY HOUSE, ASRAMAM VIA,
               PARALAM P.O, VEGENESSERY, THRISSUR - 680563.

      5        NIJO JOSE, AGED 33 YEARS
               S/O. LATE MP JOSE, MANAGAN HOUSE, KIZHAKKUMPATTUKARA
               ROAD, EAST FORT P.O, THRISSUR - 680005.

      6        CHANDRAN T.P., AGED 65 YEARS
               S/O. PAZHANI, THARAMCODE VEEDU, KALLUR, MANKARA,
               PALAKKAD - 678613.

      7        AKASH P. ASOKAN, AGED 26 YEARS
               S/O. P ASHOKAN, PARANGANATTU HOUSE, KAIPARAMBU P.O,
               THRISSUR - 680546.

      8        ROBIN PAUL, AGED 32 YEARS
               S/O. LATE PAUL MI, MURIYADAN HOUSE, OLLUKKARA P.O,
               PARAVATTANI, THRISSUR - 680655.

      9        MIDHUN MOHAN, AGED 25 YEARS
               S/O. MOHANAN, VETTIPLAVIL HOUSE, ALPARA P.O, KOTTAYAM
               - 686544.

      10       KRISHNANKUTTY, AGED 61 YEARS
               S/O. NARAYANAN, YADHUKULAM, OMALLUR P.O,
               PATHANAMTHITTA - 689647.
 WP(C).No.7112 OF 2021(L)

                                    2

                 SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR
                 SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN
                 SMT.SHEEBA G
                 SRI.O.A.ANJU
                 SHRI.SARATH KRISHNAN T.

RESPONDENTS:

        1        THE UNION OF INDIA
                 REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
                 LABOUR, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, MAN
                 SINGH ROAD, NIRMAN BHAWAN, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,
                 NEW DELHI - 110011.

        2        LABOR COMMISSIONER
                 THOZHIL BHAVAN, VIKAS BHAVAN, PMG.
                 THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA - 695033.

        3        THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER(C)
                 OFFICE OF THE DY.CLC(C) KENDRIYASHRAMSADAN,
                 OLIMUGHAL, KAKKANAD, KOCHI - 682030.

        4        ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER(CENTRAL)
                 KENDRIYASHRAMSADAN, KAKKANAD, KOCHI - 682030.

        5        SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD,
                 REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER, HEAD OFFICE, T.B. ROAD,
                 MISSION QUARTERS, THRISSUR - 680001.

                 SMT.POOJA SURENDRAN-GP

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
19.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C).No.7112 OF 2021(L)

                                      3


                                JUDGMENT

Dated this the 19th day of March 2021

The petitioners have approached this Court seeking a

direction to the first respondent - Union of India, to consider

Exts.P2 and P3 and refer the issues raised by them therein, as

an Industrial Dispute to the concerned Labour

Court/Industrial Tribunal without any further delay.

2. Sri.Benny P.Thomas, learned counsel appearing for

the fifth respondent - South Indian Bank, submitted that he

does not stand in the way of an appropriate order being

issued in this case, because the petitioners have only sought

that an Industrial Dispute be raised.

3. The learned Assistant Solicitor General of India,

appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 4, also submitted

that if the petitioners only require Exts.P2 and P3 to be

disposed of by the first respondent appropriately, necessary

action can be completed without any further delay.

In the afore circumstances, I order this writ petition and

direct the first respondent to take up Exts.P2 and P3 and

dispose of the same; and if it is found necessary to refer the WP(C).No.7112 OF 2021(L)

disputes to the appropriate Courts/Tribunal, then they will do

so as expeditiously as is possible, but not later than three

months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.




                                         Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

Stu                                               JUDGE
 WP(C).No.7112 OF 2021(L)





                              APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1         A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY
                   THE PETITIONERS THROUGH ONLINE.

EXHIBIT P2         A TRUE COPY OF THE FAILURE REPORT DATED
                   09.02.2021.

EXHIBIT P3         A TRUE COPY OF THE FAILURE REPORT IN RESPECT OF

THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE ROSE BY THE 10TH PETITIONER.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter