Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

For Information Purpose Only vs Bharath
2021 Latest Caselaw 9147 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9147 Ker
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2021

Kerala High Court
For Information Purpose Only vs Bharath on 18 March, 2021
CRL.A 1351/2006                      1/3



                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  Present:
                    THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI

        Thursday,the 18th day of March 2021/27th Phalguna, 1942
                             CRL.A No.1351/2006

           For information purpose only
    SC No.103/2004 of the ADDL. SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC-I), KOTTAYAM


APPELLANT
       BHARATH
       S/O.SYAM RAO, SHUBHASANTHIYIL HOUSE, UNION CLUB BHAGOM,,
       THIRUNAKKARA KARA, KOTTAYAM.



RESPONDENT
       STATE OF KERALA
       REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
       KERALA,, ERNAKULAM.




    This Criminal Appeal     having come up   for orders on 18/3/2021
upon hearing the arguments of M/S LIJI.J.VADAKEDOM, Advocate
for the appellant and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the respondent,
the Court passed the following:




                                                                     P.T.O
.
 CRL.A 1351/2006          2/3




           For information purpose only
                            T.R.RAVI, J.
                    --------------------------------
                       Crl.A.No.1351 of 2006
                  --------------------------------------
            Dated this the 18th day of March, 2021

                           ORDER

For information purpose only This appeal is against the order of the Court below

whereby a prayer for return of MO2, which is cash of

Rs.25,000/-, was rejected finding that there is no proof to show

that the said amount belongs to PW1 who is the appellant. MO1

which was gold ingots, have been ordered to be returned to the

appellant. It is seen from the judgment of the court below in

SC.No.103/2004 that accused Nos. 4 and 5 were absconding

and the case was proceeded only against accused Nos. 1 and 3.

The Public Prosecutor shall take instructions regarding the

stage of enquiry as against accused Nos.4 and 5.

Registry is directed to get a report from the Court below

regarding the further proceedings that had been initiated

against accused Nos.4 and 5 in this case and whether they have

already faced trial for the offence.

Post on 31.03.2021.

Sd/-

T.R.RAVI, JUDGE Sn

/true copy/ Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter