Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9124 Ker
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2021
Crl.MC.No.1289 OF 2021(A)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V.
THURSDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1942
Crl.MC.No.1289 OF 2021(A)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 3324/2016 OF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,VADAKKANCHERRY
CRIME NO.571/2016 OF Pazhayannur Police Station , Thrissur
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 3
1 SUJITH P.S.
AGED 36 YEARS
S/O. SUNDARAN, PADINJARETHIL HOUSE, ELANAD P.O,
TALAPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR 680 586
2 SUNDARAN,
AGED 59 YEARS
S/O. NARAYANAN, PADINJARETHIL HOUSE, ELANAD P.O,
TALAPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR 680 586
3 LALITHA,
AGED 52 YEARS
W/O. SUNDARAN, PADINJARETHIL HOUSE, ELANAD P.O,
TALAPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR 680 586
BY ADVS.
SRI.C.HARIKUMAR
SHRI.ANAND GOKULDAS
RESPONDENTS/STATE AND DEFACTO COMPLAINANT
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031
2 SILPA S
AGED 28 YEARS
D/O. SATHEESH, NECHUR HOUSE, NECHUR P.O, ALATHUR
TALUK, PALAKKAD 678 722
R2 BY ADV. RENJITH RAJAPPAN
SR.PP C.N PRABAKARAN
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
18.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No.1289 OF 2021(A)
ORDER
Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure.
2. The petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 3 in C.C. No.
3324 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-
Wadakkanchery registered for the offences punishable under Section
498A and Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, arising out of Crime
No.571 of 2016 of Pazhayannur Police Station.
3. Heard both sides and perused the records.
4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners
that the parties have resolved the entire dispute among themselves
and there is no subsisting dispute between them. Therefore, this
petition to quash Annexure A1 final report and all further proceedings
in C.C.No.3324 of 2016.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the 2 nd
respondent/defacto complainant has submitted that she has absolutely
no grievance or complaint against the petitioners. Annexure A2, the
affidavit sworn to by her, indicates that she has no intention to
pursue the matter further.
6. The learned Public Prosecutor has reported that the Crl.MC.No.1289 OF 2021(A)
prosecution has no serious objection in allowing the petition.
7. As the dispute has been amicably settled, the possibility
of conviction is remote and bleak.
8. Therefore, considering the special facts and
circumstances involved in this case, I find that no fruitful purpose is
likely to be served by proceeding with the matter against the
petitioners. Moreover, no public interest is involved in the case and
there is no legal impediment in granting the prayer as sought for by
the petitioners. Therefore, for the purpose of securing the ends of
justice, this Crl.M.C. is only to be allowed.
For the foregoing reasons, Annexure A1 final report and all
further proceedings in C.C. No. 3324 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial
First Class Magistrate, Wadakkanchery arising from Crime No.571 of
2016 of Pazhayannoor Police Station will stand quashed as prayed for.
Sd/-
SHIRCY V.
smm JUDGE Crl.MC.No.1289 OF 2021(A)
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN C.C NO. 3324 OF 2016 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, WADAKKANCHERY
ANNEXURE A2 THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN TO BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 16-02-2021
ANNEXURE A3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT ENTERED IN THIS CONTEXT BETWEEN THE 1ST PETITIONER AND THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 05-12-2016
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!