Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 8565 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 24TH PHALGUNA, 1942
RP.No.264 OF 2020 IN RSA. 1153/2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN RSA 1153/2019 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/ APPELLANT/ APPELLANT/ DEFENDANT:
V.V. PONNAPPAN
AGED 64 YEARS
S/O.VAINATHEYAN, VELIYIL HOUSE, THUMPOLY, P.O, ARYADU
SOUTH VILLAGE ALAPPUZHA
BY ADVS.
SRI.AJITH VISWANATHAN
SRI.P.VISWANATHAN (SR.)
RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS / PLAINTIFFS:
1 M.K. PURUSHAN
AGED 72 YEARS
S/O.KRISHNAN, CHETHIKKATTU VELI, WARD NO.5, MUHAMMA
PANCHAYATHY, CHARAMANGALAM MURI, THANNERMUKHAM SOUTH
VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA, PIN-688527
2 C.K.GOPALAN
AGED 69 YEARS
S/O.KRISHNAN, CHETHIKKATTU VELI, WARD NO.5, MUHAMMA
PANCHAYATHY, CHARAMANGALAM MURI, THANNERMUKHAM SOUTH
VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA, PIN-688527
3 C.K.MUKUNDAN
AGED 64 YEARS
S/O.KRISHNAN, CHETHIKKATTU VELI, WARD NO.5, MUHAMMA
PANCHAYATHY, CHARAMANGALAM MURI, THANNERMUKHAM SOUTH
VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA, PIN-688527
4 J.MAHILAMANI
AGED 55 YEARS
D/O.KRISHNAN, CHETHIKKATTU VELI, WARD NO.5, MUHAMMA
PANCHAYATHY, CHARAMANGALAM MURI, THANNERMUKHAM SOUTH
VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA, PIN-688527
5 SOBHA
AGED 56 YEARS
KORAKKULANGARA VELI THANNERMUKKAM NORTH VILLAGE,
2
RP.No.264 OF 2020 IN RSA. 1153/2019
CHERTHALA PIN-688527
6 GEETHA
AGED 54 YEARS
KORAKKULANGARA VELI THANNERMUKKAM NORTH VILLAGE,
CHERTHALA PIN-688527
7 GIRIJA
AGED 51 YEARS
KORAKKULANGARA VELI THANNERMUKKAM NORTH VILLAGE,
CHERTHALA PIN-688527
8 AMBILI
AGED 48 YEARS
KORAKKULANGARA VELI THANNERMUKKAM NORTH VILLAGE,
CHERTHALA PIN-688527
9 MADHU
AGED 45 YEARS
KORAKKULANGARA VELI THANNERMUKKAM NORTH VILLAGE,
CHERTHALA PIN-688527
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
15.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
3
RP.No.264 OF 2020 IN RSA. 1153/2019
ORDER
The contentions urged in the review petition have
already been dealt with in the impugned judgment.
Review is not to be an appeal in disguise. There is no
error apparent warranting the review petition to be
entertained.
The Review Petition fails and is accordingly
dismissed.
Sd/-
SATHISH NINAN
JUDGE
rsr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!