Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 8521 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR
MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 24TH PHALGUNA, 1942
WP(C).No.6517 OF 2021(L)
PETITIONER/S:
LEELA . V.P,
AGED 60 YEARS,
W/O. THATTARAMBATH PARANGODAN, PERMANENTLY RESIDING
AT VALPARAMBIL HOUSE, PACHATTIRI P.O, TIRUR TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
MALAPPURAM, MALAPPURAM P.O, PIN - 676505.
2 THE TAHSILDAR,
TIRUR TALUK OFFICE, TIRUR P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,
PIN - 676101.
3 THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
TANALUR VILLAGE, TANALUR P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,
PIN - 676307.
4 THE STATE TAX OFFICER,
TIRUR, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, MINI CIVIL STATION
BUILDING, TIRUR P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,
PIN - 676101.
5 ACCOMPLISH MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED,
TIRUR P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676101,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
6 JAYACHANDRAN,
S/O. MUDIYERI VASU, OZHUR P.O, TIRUR TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676307.
R1 TO R4 BY GP- SMT. THUSHARA JAMES
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
15.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.6517 OF 2021
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 15th day of March 2021
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. Learned
Government Pleader takes notice for respondents 1 to
4.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that the
property covered by sale deed at Ext.P1 is the
personal property of the 6th respondent, who is the
Managing Director of the 5th respondent private limited
company. The petitioner is alleging that the personal
property of the 6th respondent is being sold for
recovery of sales tax dues. The petitioner is
contending that the property covered by the sale deed
at Ext.P1 is under attachment of the Civil Court in a
suit instituted by the petitioner and therefore the
petitioner has filed a representation at Ext.P5 before WP(C).No.6517 OF 2021
the 1st respondent District Collector, Malappuram. The
sale is scheduled to be held on 07.04.2021 and
therefore, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits
that the 1st respondent be directed to decide the
representation at Ext.P5 submitted by the petitioner
prior to 07.04.2021.
3. Learned Government Pleader oppose the petition,
but contended that the representation if any filed by
the petitioner shall be decided by the 1 st respondent
within a prescribed time frame granted by this Court.
4. In this view of the matter, the petition is
disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to
decide the representation by 30.03.2021. The
petitioner to communicate this judgment to the 1st
respondent and also to supply one additional copy of
the representation at Ext.P5 to the 1 st respondent for
deciding the same according to the provisions of law. WP(C).No.6517 OF 2021
It is expected of the 1st respondent to grant
opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before
deciding the representation at Ext.P5.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/-
A.M.BADAR
JUDGE
uu
16.3.2021 WP(C).No.6517 OF 2021
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.1440/2013 OF SRO TANUR DATED 5.4.2013.
EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS NO.62/2017 OF MUNSIFF COURT, TIRUR, DATED 7.2.2017.
EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE SUB REGISTRAR, TANUR DATED 6.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE SALE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 19.02.2021.
EXHIBIT P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 1.3.2021.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!