Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 8335 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 21ST PHALGUNA, 1942
WP(C).No.6448 OF 2021(E)
PETITIONER:
AZIYA ANZAR
AGED 21 YEARS
D/O.M.A. ANZAR, SHAMNA GARDENS, MANGADUCHERY,
KILIKOLLOOR P.O., KOLLAM-691004.
BY ADV. SRI.K.A.SIYAD
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
KOLLAM DISTRICT, CIVIL STATION ROAD,
KAANKATHU MUKKU,
KOLLAM-691013.
2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
RDO OFFICE,
PUNALUR-691305.
3 THE THAHASILDAR,
KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, TALUK OFFICE,
KOTTARAKKARA-691506.
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
VETTIKKAVALA VILLAGE,
VETTIKKAVALA VILLAGE OFFICE,
PIN-691531.
5 THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,
KRISHI BHAVAN, VETTIKKAVALA,
KOLLAM-691531.
6 THE CONVENOR,
LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE,
VETTIKAVALA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PANCHAYATH OFFICE,
SABARIMALA BYPASS, KOLLAM-691531.
SRI.RAVIKRISHNAN, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
12.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.6448 OF 2021(E)
2
W.P.(C) No.6448 of 2021
-----------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT
Ext.P2 is an application preferred by the petitioner in
Form No.5 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland
Rules (the Rules) for removal of the property of the petitioner
referred to in the writ petition from the data bank prepared in
terms of the Kerala conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act,
2008 (the Act). Ext.P3 is another application preferred by the
petitioner in Form No.7 of the Rules for permission to utilize the
said land which is an un-notified land in terms of the Act, for other
purposes. The grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition
concerns the inaction on the part of the second respondent in
taking a decision on Ext.P2 and Ext.P3 applications.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as
also the learned Government Pleader.
3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of
the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition WP(C).No.6448 OF 2021(E)
directing the second respondent to take up and pass appropriate
orders on Ext.P2 in accordance with law, if the same is received
and pending, after affording the petitioner an opportunity of
hearing. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say that if Ext.P2
application is allowed, orders shall be passed by the second
respondent simultaneously on Ext.P3 application as well. This shall
be done within three months from the date of production of a copy
of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the
petitioner. If the applications directed to be disposed of are found
defective, the defect shall be intimated to the petitioner by the
second respondent immediately on production of a copy of this
judgment, and the second respondent will be entitled to avail the
time taken by the petitioner to cure the defects in the applications
also, for compliance of the directions contained in this judgment. It
is made clear that the hearing in terms of this judgment can either
be physical or through video conference.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
PV WP(C).No.6448 OF 2021(E)
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 03/11/2020.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION IN FORM NO.5 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 15/02/2021.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION IN FORM NO.7 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 15/02/2021.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE CHALLAN FOR THE APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 27A DATED 16/02/2021.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!