Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7814 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR
FRIDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 14TH PHALGUNA, 1942
WP(C).No.4682 OF 2021(I)
PETITIONERS:
1 QUALONIX CYBER PARK
GANGA PLAZA, KSEB BUIDLING, SREEKANDAPURAM, KANNUR,
KERALA PIN 670 631 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER
2 PRAVEEN P TOM,
AGED 30 YEARS
S/O. TOMY P PULIKAKL , RESIDING AT PULIKAL HOUSE,
VAYATTUPARAMBA P.O, BALARAMAPURAM, KANNUR, KERALA PIN 670
582
3 LINTO P KURIAKOSE,
AGED 30 YEARS
S/O. KURIAKOSE, RESIDING AT PAMPARA HOUSE,
CHANDANAKAMPARA P.O KANNUR, KERALA PIN 670 652
BY ADVS.
SMT.A.V.INDIRA
SHRI.ANANDA PADMANABHAN
SHRI.MAHESH CHANDRAN
SHRI.AKHIL GEORGE
SHRI.GAJENDRA SINGH RAJPUROHIT
RESPONDENTS:
1 SOUTH INDIAN BANK
HAVING ITS HEADQUARTERS AT SIB HOUSE, T B ROAD, MISSION
QUARTERS, THRISSUR, KERALA PIN 680 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR
2 THE CHIEF MANAGER,
SOUTH INDIAN BANK , REGIONAL OFFICE, KANNUR, KVR TOWER,
PAMPAN MADHAVAN ROAD, OPP LIC OFFICE, TALAP, KANNUR,
KERALA PIN 670 002
3 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA,
MAIN BUILDING, P.O BOX 901, SHAHID BHAGAT SINGH ROAD,
MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA 400 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS GOVERNOR.
R1-2 BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL SHANKER
R1-2 BY ADV. SMT.VIDYA GANGADHARAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
05.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.4682 OF 2021(I)
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 5th day of March 2021
Heard both sides.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners argued that the
petitioners had availed loan of Rs.41,00,000/- for purchase of
machinery apart from other loans and they were regular in repayment
of those loans. However, in the month of June, 2019, the petitioner
could not pay EMIs for a continuous period of three months because of
default of customers of the petitioner in payment of bills. The learned
counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners had therefore
made a representation, Ext.P6 for availing the benefit of one time
settlement scheme of the respondent Bank of relieving of the dues. It
is further argued that the respondent Bank had framed its guidelines
for granting benefit of the OTS to the micro and small enterprises
which is at Ext.P2 and by keeping in mind, those guidelines,
representation of the petitioners which is at Ext.P6 deserves to be
decided by the respondents.
3. The learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2
submits that the competent officer of the respondents shall decide the
representation at Ext.P6 by keeping in mind, all necessary applicable
guidelines within a period of one week from today. WP(C).No.4682 OF 2021(I)
4. In this view of the matter, the petition is disposed of with
the following direction.
5. The authority of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 shall decide
the representation at Ext.P6 filed by the petitioners within a period of
one week from the date of communication of this judgment. This Court
hope and trust that the concerned authority shall keep in mind all
guidelines of the respondent financial institute while deciding the
representation at Ext.P6 for grant of benefit of one time settlement
scheme.
The petitioners to supply copy of this judgment to the
respondent for necessary compliance.
SD/-
A.M.BADAR Nsd //TRUE COPY// JUDGE PA TO JUDGE WP(C).No.4682 OF 2021(I)
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE LOAN SANCTION LETTER DATED 22-03-2016
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 14-
EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ACCOUNT STATEMENT OF THE PETITIONER FIRM
EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 07-12-2020 ISSUED BY THE BANK
EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE OTS SCHEME ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BANK
EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 04-
02-2021 MADE BY THE PETITIONER TO
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!