Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sasidharan Pillai vs Sasidharan Pillai
2021 Latest Caselaw 7227 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7227 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 March, 2021

Kerala High Court
Sasidharan Pillai vs Sasidharan Pillai on 2 March, 2021
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                             PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

                                &

         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

    TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 11TH PHALGUNA, 1942

                      OP (FC).No.584 OF 2019

AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24.6.2019 IN OP 742/2018 OF FAMILY COURT,
                             CHAVARA


PETITIONER/PETITIONER/2ND RESPONDENT:

             SASIDHARAN PILLAI
             AGED 65 YEARS
             S/O.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, RESIDING AT PLAVILA PUTHEN
             VEEDU, MANAMPUZHA.P.O., KADAMBANAD SOUTH, KUNNATHOOR-
             638103.

             BY ADVS.
             SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN
             SMT.BHANU THILAK

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/1ST PETITIONER:

             PARVATHY CHANDRAN,
             AGED 22 YEARS
             D/O.RAMESH CHANDRAN, GAURI VILASOM, IVARKALA WEST
             SOUTH, PUTHANAMBALAM.P.O., KUNNATHOOR-638103.


     THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD            ON
02.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 O.P.(FC).No.584/2019
                                      2




                                   JUDGMENT

Dated this the 2nd day of March 2021

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J

This original petition was filed challenging the order

in I.A.No.2451/2018 in O.P.No.742/2018 filed for lifting

the attachment over the petition schedule property. The petitioner filed a claim petition which was partly allowed.

Aggrieved by the above order, the petitioner has come up

with this original petition.

2. The above order refusing to lift attachment is an

appealable order. Hence, we need not invoke our power

under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to upset the

finding of fact.

In the result, this original petition is dismissed as

not maintainable.

Sd/-

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

JUDGE

Sd/-

                                          Dr. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

                 True copy                          JUDGE
kp                 P.A. To Judge
 O.P.(FC).No.584/2019




                           APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1             TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PETITION DATED

NIL IN O.P.NO.742/2018 PENDING BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE I.A.DATED 30.11.2018 IN I.A.2451/2018 IN O.P.NO.742/2018 FILED BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT,CHAVARA.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT HEREIN IN IA.NO.2451/2018 IN O.P.NO.742/2018 OF THE FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA DATED NIL.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 24.6.2019 IN I.A.NO.2451/2018 IN O.P.NO.742/2018 OF THE FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.7040/1965 OF SRO ADOOR EXECUTED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter