Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Greeshma A.G vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 6996 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6996 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2021

Kerala High Court
Greeshma A.G vs State Of Kerala on 1 March, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

                 THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

     MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1942

                       WP(C).No.2262 OF 2021(G)


PETITIONERS:

      1        GREESHMA A.G.
               AGED 17 YEARS
               D/O GURUVAYOORAPPAN AND PRIYA K, LAKSHMI NIVAS,
               ANAMARI POST, KOLLENGODE VIA, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD
               DISTRICT.
               REPRESENTED BY THE NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER
               PRIYA K , W/O GURUVAYORAPPAN, LAKSHMI NIVAS, ANAMARI
               POST, KOLENGODE VIA, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD
               DISTRICT-678506.

      2        SRUTHI SURESH
               AGED 17 YEARS
               D/O SURESH AND SUNITHA, THOTTIYATHARA, MUTHALAMADA
               POST, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED
               BY THE NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER
               SUNITHA K, W/O SURESH, THOTTIYATHARA, MUTHALAMADA
               POST, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,-678507.

      3        AMEHA M
               AGED 16 YEARS
               D/O MOHANAN AND RAJANI R, KUMIZHIPPADAM, VADAVANNUR
               POST, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,
               REPRESENTED BY THE NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTNER
               RAJANI R,
               W/O MOHANAN,
               KUMIZHIPPADAM, VADAVANNUR POST, CHITTUR TALUK,
               PALAKKAD DISTRICT,-678504.

      4        GIRIN A G
               AGED 16 YEARS
               S/O GURUVAYOORAPPAN AND PRIYA K, LAKSHMI NIVAS,
               ANAMARI POST, KOLLENGODE VIA, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD
               DISTRICT,
               REPRESENTED BY THE NATURAL GUARDIAN, AND MOTHER,
               PRIYA K,
               W/O GURUVAYOORAPPAN,
               LAKSHMI NIVAS, ANAMARI POST, KOLLENGODE VIA, CHITTUR
               TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678506.

               BY ADVS.
               SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K.
 WP(C).No.2262 OF 2021(G)

                                 2

               SRI.LIJU. M.P
               SRI.JOPHY POTHEN KANDANKARY

RESPONDENTS:

      1        STATE OF KERALA
               REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
               DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION,
               GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

      2        THE STATE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF BHARAT SCOUTS
               AND GUIDES (DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION),
               JAGATHY, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-14.

      3        THE STATE ORGANISER AND COMMISSIONER
               THE KERALA STATE BHARAT SCOUTS AND GUIDES, STATE
               HEADQUARTERS,
               VIKAS BHAVAN POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695033.

      4        THE DISTRICT ORGANISER AND COMMISSIONER
               THE KERALA STATE BHARAT SCOUTS AND GUIDES, DISTRICT
               HEADQUARTERS, JAMBOORI BHAVAN, NEAR DISTRICT
               PANCHAYAT OFFICE, PALAKKAD-01.

               R1-2 BY SMT.VINITHA.B, GOVERNMENT PLEADER



     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
01.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C).No.2262 OF 2021(G)

                                             3


                                   JUDGMENT

Dated this the 1st day of March 2021

The petitioners are Higher Secondary School

students. Their complaint is that Rajya Puraskar test

is not being conducted this year for the students

studying in 11th and 12th standards. It is stated

that the petitioners 1 to 3 are members of Kasthurba

Open Guide Group at Kollengode and petitioner No.4 is

a member of Gandhiji Open Scout Group at Kollengode.

Relying on the provisions contained in Chapter II of

the Rules and Organisation of Scout Group, the

petitioners claimed that they are entitled to appear

in the Rajya Puraskar test which was being conducted

every year for the students studying in 10th as well

as those studying in 11th and 12th standards. It is

stated that there is a unit of scout/guide; the

students attached to these units who are in the age

group of 10 and 17 are entitled to appear in the

Rajya Puraskar test irrespective of the nature of the

units. It is also their contention that they are

eligible to continue in the Scout/Guide group till

they attain the age of 18 years provided they

continue their studies. It is also stated that those WP(C).No.2262 OF 2021(G)

who pass the Rajya Puraskar test are entitled to

grace marks. Pointing out Ext.P5, it is stated that

the respondents have decided to conduct the Rajya

Puraskar test for the 10th standard students

irrespective of the fact that they belong to open

group or otherwise. The petitioners claim that the

respondents have to conduct the test for the 11 th and

12th standard students also, as was being done all

these years and there is no justifiable reason for

any discrimination in the case of the students

studying in 11th and 12th standards by not conducting

the test and in taking away their entitlement for

grace marks on passing the examination.

2. The 2nd respondent has filed a statement.

It is stated that on account of Covid-19 pandemic,

the respondents have notified rajya puraskar

examination for the 10th standard students only and

the same was conducted from June 2020 to February,

2021. It is stated that those who pass the test

conducted between June to February, 2021 would be

eligible for grace marks for their board

examinations. It is stated that the 11th and 12th

standard students are not given the benefit of grace

marks even if they appear in Rajya Puraskar

examination. It is further stated that those who WP(C).No.2262 OF 2021(G)

applied for Rajya Puraskar Badge should have

completed 30 months' experience in an approved unit

of Scouts and Guides and therefore a child who is

joining Scouts or Guides at 10 years of age is

eligible to claim Rajya Puraskar Badge after getting

experience of 12½ years and in order to apply for the

Rastrapathi Award, the child should get experience of

12 more months after getting the Rajya Puraskar

Badge. It is also stated that in order to appear for

the Rajya Puraskar examination, the child should have

joined the unit on or before 30.06.2018. It is also

stated that one who joins the Scouts/Guides can

continue till he/she attains the age of 18 years

except in the case of open unit students. The 2nd

respondent has stated that the petitioners who are

members of Kasthurba Guides Open Unit and Gandhiji

Open Scouts Unit got their warrant on 02.02.2019

only.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the

petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader.

4. According to the learned counsel for the

petitioners, any child who joins Scouts/Guides can

continue till he /she attains the age of 18 years on

condition that they continue to be students i.e, up

to Plus 2. Relying on the provisions contained in WP(C).No.2262 OF 2021(G)

Ext.P3 and the dates given in Ext.P2, the learned

counsel for the petitioners submits that the

respective groups have got registration in 2018

itself.

5. The relief sought in the writ petition is

for a direction to the respondents to conduct Rajya

Puraskar test for open group students. The

respondents have stated that they have decided not to

conduct Rajya Puraskar test this year due to Covid-19

pandemic and that the students like the petitioners

would not be eligible for grace marks even if they

appear in the said test. No provision is pointed out

which mandates the respondents to conduct the test

every year. However, as it is pointed out that the

test is being conducted every year for the scouts and

guides and the respondents have conducted the test

for 10th standard students, it is only appropriate

that the 2nd respondent considers the claim of the

petitioners for conducting the test.

6. As pointed out by the learned counsel for

the petitioners, it is seen that even after

completing more than two years of their joining

scouts and guides i.e, from June, 2018 onwards, the

petitioners were unable to get even a badge. All of

them have joined and continued in the scouts and WP(C).No.2262 OF 2021(G)

guides under the legitimate expectation that they

would be able to appear in the Rajya Puraskar test.

7. Therefore, there shall be a direction to

the competent among the respondents 2 and 3 to

consider the claim of the petitioners and to take a

decision at the earliest opportunity, within a period

of one month, as to whether it would be possible to

conduct examination after the Plus 2 examinations are

over and before the results are announced.

Sd/-

P.V.ASHA JUDGE DM WP(C).No.2262 OF 2021(G)

APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE GROUP RECORD BOOK OF KASTHURBA OPEN GUIDE GROUP AT KOLLENGODE.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE GROUP RECORD BOOK OF GANDHIJI OPEN SCOUT GROUP, KOLLENGODE.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF CLAUSE 1 OF CHAPTER II OF THE AIMS, POLICY, RULES AND ORGANISATION OF SCOUT WING.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF CLAUSE 1 OF CHAPTER II OF THE AIMS, POLICY, RULES AND ORGANISATION OF GUIDE WING.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE PUBLICATION MADE BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL

//TRUE COPY//

PA TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter