Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10623 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 8TH CHAITHRA, 1943
WP(C).No.7899 OF 2021(J)
PETITIONER/S:
1 ASHRAF THAYYIL
AGED 46 YEARS
S/O AMMAD,
KUMMANKODE, NADAPURAM,
KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
2 BINEETHA R.
AGED 34 YEARS
D/O UNNI,
VADAKKEVILA VEEDU, KURUMPAKARA P.O, PATHANAPURAM,
ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE DISTRICT LEVEL AUTHORIZATION COMMITTEE
FOR TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS,
ERNAKULAM,
ERNAKULAM MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL,
KALAMASSERY, PIN-683104, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.
2 THE CONVENER,
LOCAL COMMITTEE OF ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, MEDICAL
TRUST HOSPITAL LTD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682016.
3 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
ADOOR,
PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN-691523.
SMT.PRINCY XAVIER, GP,
SRI.R.S.KALKURA,SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
29.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.7899 OF 2021(J) 2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 29th day of March 2021
The 1st petitioner is undergoing the
treatment for kidney disease in Medical Trust
Hospital, Ernakulam and he is advised to have
kidney transplantation at the earliest point of
time. It is stated that since the kidney of the
close relatives of the 1st petitioner is not
suitable for transplantation, the 2nd petitioner
has come forward to donate her kidney.
2. Petitioners submitted that though they
submitted Exts.P4 and P5 applications along with
all documents before the 2nd respondent, the same
is not forwarded.
3. Sri.R.S.Kalkura, the learned Counsel for
the 2nd respondent submitted that petitioners are
yet to submit application and as and when
application along with all the documents are
produced, they will forward the same to the 1st
respondent.
4. The transplantation of kidney from
unrelated donors are governed by Section 9(3) of
the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues
Act, 1994 ('the Act, 1994') and Rule 7(3) of the
Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues
Rules, 2014 ('the Rules 2014'). The 1st
respondent is the authority constituted for
examining the applications for transplantation
of kidney in such circumstances when the donor
is not related to the donee, in accordance with
the provisions contained in the Act and Rules.
Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of,
with a direction to the 2nd respondent to forward
the applications Exts.P4 and P5, as soon as it
is received, to the 1st respondent along with all
the documents within a period of three days from
the date of its receipt. As it is stated that
liver transplantation is required emergently,
there shall be a further direction to the 1st
respondent to examine the said applications
along with relevant documents after obtaining a
report from the 3rd respondent and to take a
decision on it in accordance with the
provisions contained in Section 9(3) of the Act,
1994 and Rule 7(3) of the Rules, 2014, as
expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a
period of two weeks from the date of receipt of
a copy of the judgment.
Sd/-
P.V.ASHA
RPS/ JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTIFICATION
CERTIFICATE OF THE DONOR AND HER BROTHER DATED 1.3.2021.
EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JOINT AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETITIONERS DATED 1.3.2021.
EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT OF THE MOTHER AND BROTHER OF THE DONOR DATED 3.3.2021.
EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FORM II APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS DATED 3.3.2021.
EXHIBIT P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 3 APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS DATED 1.3.2021.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!