Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10181 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1943
WP(C).No.154 OF 2021(T)
PETITIONERS:
1 LILLYKKUTTY
AGED 65 YEARS
W/O. SEBASTIAN, KUNNEL HOUSE, 5/73,
KERALASSERY P.O, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678641.
2 MARYKUTTY
AGED 63 YEARS
W/O.LUKE, KUNNEL HOUSE, 5/73,
KERALASSERY P.O, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678641.
BY ADV. SHRI.M.C.JOHN
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ,
FOREST AND WILD LIFE DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001.
2 THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS AND CUSTODIAN OF
VESTED FORESTS, EASTERN CIRCLE,
ARANAYABHAVAN COMPLEX, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,
PIN - 678002,
3 THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
PALAKKAD DIVISION, KALLEKULANGARA P.O,
PALAKKAD, PIN - 678009.
OTHER PRESENT:
SPL.GP.SRI.SANDESH RAJA.K
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.154 OF 2021(T)
2
J U D G M E N T
Petitioners, are siblings, who claim to be the
absolute owners in possession and enjoyment of .7070
Hectares of land in Survey No.130/1 (Re survey
No.134/1) of Keralasserry Village, by virtue of Ext.P2
and P2(a) sale deeds dated 08.06.2016. It is stated
that they got the said property alienated from the
legal heirs of late Madhavan Unni Panicker who was the
applicant in O.A.No.506/1974 before the Forest
Tribunal, Palakkad which culminated in Ext.P1 order,
declaring that the said property is not a vested
forest. It is stated that late Madhavan Unni Panicker
was in uninterrupted possession and was engaged in
cultivation of the property. This writ petition was
filed alleging that the officers of the Forest
Department were encroaching into the property of
petitioners and started fixing the jundas.
2. The learned Special Government Pleader for
Forest submits that restoration on the basis of WP(C).No.154 OF 2021(T)
Ext.P1 order passed by the Forest Tribunal can be
effected only after the survey is completed. It is
submitted that though steps were taken for undertaking
survey it could not be commenced on account of the
prevailing circumstances including the climatic
conditions as well as the ensuing election to
legislative assembly, when the officers are deputed
for election duty.
Therefore the writ petition is disposed of
directing the respondents to see that the proceedings
for restoration of the land involved in Ext.P1 order
are completed after undertaking survey expeditiously
and at any rate within a period of 'eight weeks' from
the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Further
proceedings shall be completed within a further period
of 'two months'.
Sd/-
P.V.ASHA, JUDGE
AS WP(C).No.154 OF 2021(T)
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29.04.1977 IN OA NO.506/74 OF THE FOREST TRIBUNAL, PALAKKAD.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED DATED 25.01.1990 IN FAVOUR OF FIRST PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P2(a) TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED DATED 25.01.1990 IN FAVOUR OF SECOND PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE BTR DATED 08.06.2016 ISSUED BY VILLAGE OFFICER TO PETITIONERS.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 11.03.2019 ISSUED BY VILLAGE OFFICER TO FIRST PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P4(a) TRUE COPY OF THE REVENUE RECEIPT DATED 21.12.2020 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER TO FIRST PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 02.03.2019 ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT TO PETITIONERS.
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS DATED 14.01.2021 PETITION.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!