Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 91 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
MONDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 14TH POUSHA, 1942
Crl.MC.No.5586 OF 2020(G)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 510/2016 DATED 21-06-2016 OF
JUDL. FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT,NORTH PARAVUR (TEMPORARY)
CRIME NO.550/2016 OF VARAPPUZHA POLICE STATION , ERNAKULAM
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED:
1 MICHAEL
AGED 56 YEARS
S/O. OUSEPH, CHAMMINIYODATHU HOUSE, KORAMBADAM KARA,
KADAMAKKUDY, PIN - 682 027
2 JISMON JOSI
AGED 21 YEARS
S/O. JOSI, CHAMMINIYODATHU HOUSE, KORAMBADAM KARA,
KADAMAKKUDY, PIN - 682 027
3 SAVIO MICHAEL
AGED 29 YEARS
S/O. MICHAEL, CHAMMINIYODATHU HOUSE, KORAMBADAM KARA,
KADAMAKKUDY, PIN - 682 027
BY ADV. K.K.VINOD
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.
2 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
VARAPPUZHA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683517
3 VIJIL V. A.
AGED 31 YEARS
S/O. ADRIYAN, VARIYATH HOUSE, KORAMBADAM KARA,
KADAMAKKUDY, PIN - 682 027
R3 BY ADV. K.S.BINOY
OTHER PRESENT:
PP RENJITH T.R.
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
04.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
CRL.M.C.NO.5586 OF 2020
2
O R D E R
Dated this the 4th day of January 2021
in Crime No.550/2016 registered at the
Varappuzha Police Station, Ernakulam for
offences punishable under Sections 323,
294(b), 448, 506 (1) read with Section 34 of
IPC, now pending as C.C.No.510/2016 on the
files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate
Court-III, North Paravur. The de facto
complainant, at whose instance the crime was
registered, is arrayed as the 3rd respondent.
Annexure-A3 affidavit has been filed by 3rd
respondent stating that the dispute, which
was the reason for the incident and
registration of the crime, has been resolved
amicably and he has no subsisting grievance
against the petitioners.
CRL.M.C.NO.5586 OF 2020
2. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor
also, who, on instructions, submits that the
petitioners have no criminal antecedents.
3. Having considered the gravity of the
offences alleged, nature of the injury
caused and having perused the affidavit
filed by the 3rd respondent, the contents of
which are submitted to be true and
voluntary, I am satisfied that the dispute
is settled and no public interest is
involved in this matter. Moreover, in view
of the settlement, possibility of the
criminal proceedings ending in conviction is
remote. As such, continuance of the
proceedings will amount to an abuse of
process of court and hence, in view of the
legal position set out by the Honourable
Supreme Court in Madan Mohan Abbot v. State
of Punjab [(2008) 4 SCC 582] and Gian Singh
v. State of Punjab and another [(2012) 10 CRL.M.C.NO.5586 OF 2020
SCC 303], there is no impediment in granting
the relief sought.
In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed.
The proceedings in C.C.No.510/2016 on the
files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate
Court-III, North Paravur is quashed.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN JUDGE NB CRL.M.C.NO.5586 OF 2020
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR DATED 06.06.2016 IN CRIME NO.550/2016 OF VARAPUZHA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM
ANNEXURE A2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 21.06.2016 IN CRIME NO.550/2016 OF VARAPUZHA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM
ANNEXURE A3 ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT DATED 27.11.2020.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!