Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 744 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 January, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
FRIDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 18TH POUSHA, 1942
Crl.MC.No.5574 OF 2020(F)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 159/2018 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
OF FIRST CLASS -I,HOSDRUG
CRIME NO.135/2017 OF HOSDURG POLICE STATION, KASARGOD
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED:
1 RANJITH.A.R
AGED 31 YEARS
S/O RAVI A S, R S NIVAS,
AJANUR KADAPPURAM,
AJANUR VILLAGE,
HOSDURG TALUK
2 ROOPESH K
AGED 27 YEARS
S/O RAMESHAN K,
KARTHIKA NILAYAM,
NEAR CRESCENT SCHOOL,
AJANUR KADAPPURAM,
AJANUR VILLAGE,
HOSDURG TALUK
3 ABHILASH A K
AGED 24 YEARS
S/O CHANDRAN A K, CHITTIKKOTTAN NILAYAM,
AJANUR KADAPPURAM,
AJANUR VILLAGE,
HOSDURG TALUK
4 AJAY PRASEED K V
AGED 40 YEARS
S/O K V KUNHAMBU,
KAVAUNGAL HOUSE,
KATTUKULANGARA,
AJANUR VILLAGE,
HOSDURG TALUK
5 RAJAN C V
AGED 44 YEARS
S/O SHAMBU, KATTADI HOUSE, KATTADI, KOLAVAYAL,
AJANUR VILLAGE, NOW R/AT ALARANDA,
PERIYA VILLAGE,
HOSDURG TALUK
CRL.M.C.NO.5574 OF 2020
2
6 PRAMOD H
AGED 39 YEARS
S/O GANESH,
NELLITHARA HOUSE, ANANDASRAMAM P O,
PULLUR VILLAGE,
HOSDURG TALUK
BY ADV. SRI.A.ARUNKUMAR
RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031
2 KUNHIRAMAN.K
AGED 59 YEARS
S/O KRISHNAN,
KAPPANANKKAL HOUSE, KATTUKULANGARA,
ANANDASRAMAM P O,
AJANUR VILLAGE,
HOSDURG TALUK,
KASARGOD DISTRICT-671314
R2 BY ADV. VIPIN T JOSE
OTHER PRESENT:
PP T.R.RENJITH
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
08.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
CRL.M.C.NO.5574 OF 2020
3
O R D E R
Dated this the 8th day of January 2021
Petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 6 in
Crime No.135/2017 registered at the Hosdurg
Police Station, Kasargode for offences
punishable under Sections 341, 323, 109,
120B read with Section 34 of IPC, now
pending as C.C.No.159/2018 on the files of
the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I,
Hosdurg. The de facto complainant, at whose
instance the crime was registered, is
arrayed as the 2nd respondent. Annexure-AIII
affidavit has been filed by 2nd respondent
stating that the dispute, which was the
reason for the incident and registration of
the crime, has been resolved amicably and he
has no subsisting grievance against the
petitioners.
CRL.M.C.NO.5574 OF 2020
2. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor
also, who, on instructions, submits that the
petitioners have no criminal antecedents.
3. Having considered the gravity of the
offences alleged, nature of the injury
caused and having perused the affidavit
filed by the 2nd respondent, the contents of
which are submitted to be true and
voluntary, I am satisfied that the dispute
is settled and no public interest is
involved in this matter. Moreover, in view
of the settlement, possibility of the
criminal proceedings ending in conviction is
remote. As such, continuance of the
proceedings will amount to an abuse of
process of court and hence, in view of the
legal position set out by the Honourable
Supreme Court in Madan Mohan Abbot v. State
of Punjab [(2008) 4 SCC 582] and Gian Singh
v. State of Punjab and another [(2012) 10 CRL.M.C.NO.5574 OF 2020
SCC 303], there is no impediment in granting
the relief sought.
In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed.
The proceedings in C.C.No.159/2018 on the
files of the Judicial First Class
Magistrate- I, Hosdurg is quashed.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN JUDGE NB CRL.M.C.NO.5574 OF 2020
APPENDIX PETITIONERS'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE-AI A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.135/2017 OF HOSDURG POLICE STATION
ANNEXURE-AII A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.135 OF 2017 OF HOSDURG POLICE STATION
ANNEXURE-AIII ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT SWORN TO BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!