Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jacob John vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 678 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 678 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 January, 2021

Kerala High Court
Jacob John vs State Of Kerala on 8 January, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

                 THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

     FRIDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 18TH POUSHA, 1942

                      WP(C).No.29032 OF 2020(D)


PETITIONER:

               JACOB JOHN,
               AGED 44 YEARS,
               S/O. JOHN XAVIOUR, J S BHAVANAM,
               GOOD SHEPHERD HOME, VADAKKUMBHAGOM, CHAVARA SOUTH,
               KOLLAM, 691 584.

               BY ADVS.
               SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ
               SRI.BASIL AJITH
               SHRI.JOHN GOMEZ

RESPONDENTS:

      1        STATE OF KERALA,
               REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DISASTER
               MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT,
               GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM - 695 001.

      2        PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
               DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
               TRIVANDRUM - 695 001.

               BY ADV. SMT.VINITHA.B, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION             ON
08.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C).No.29032 OF 2020(D)

                                   2




                               JUDGMENT

Petitioner, who claims that his

daughter Amala Jain Jacob, is a student of 9 th

standard in a Government Higher Secondary

School at Chavara, seeks a direction to the

Government of Kerala to permit re-opening and

functioning of Schools and Technical

Educational Institutions.

2. The petitioner states that Ext.P1

order issued by Government on 24.11.2020 by

which other educational institutions except

schools and technical education institutions

were allowed to function is in violation of

Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The

next contention of the petitioner is that the

students are prevented from meeting their

teachers and clear their doubts or seek

assistance for studying their portions and WP(C).No.29032 OF 2020(D)

that they have to rely on unpredictable

internet connections for pursuing their

education and they are left with less equipped

means to prepare for year-end exams for the

promotion to the next academic year.

3. The learned Government Pleader points

out that the Government has been issuing

orders from time to time taking stock of the

situation; even in Ext.P1 the number of

students, who are permitted to attend, was

restricted to a maximum of 100 while relaxing

the COVID protocol. It is stated that the High

Level Committee under the Chief Minister had

in its meeting held on 17.12.2020 decided that

students of 10th and 12th standard would be

permitted to attend the Schools from

01.01.2021, with the permission of their

parents, in order to prepare for them to

appear in the public examination to be held in WP(C).No.29032 OF 2020(D)

March 2021, to clear their doubts in

continuation of the digital classes, to

prepare them for model examination, etc

strictly in accordance with the COVID

protocol. Director of General Education, as

per his letter dated 24.12.2020 addressed to

the Heads of the Schools, forwarded the

guidelines containing the precautionary

measures to be taken by all the stake holders

including the teachers as well as the

students. In order to observe physical

distancing, sanitisation, etc, they are

directed to arrange the classes in different

batches with different duration, after

constituting a COVID cell, comprising of

personnel from Police department as well as

local bodies, which has to submit daily

surveillance report in the prescribed form.

4. Thus classes for 10th and 12th standard WP(C).No.29032 OF 2020(D)

of the schools under the General Educational

Department as well as students of the Colleges

have already been permitted to function with

strict restrictions, that too in different

batches and different timings for the students

of the very same class.

5. In the circumstances of the case it

is clear that the Government had issued orders

closing Schools due to the outbreak of the

COVID-19 pandemic, in the larger interest of

public which includes students community also,

to arrest the spread/super spread in view of

such unprecedented and extra ordinary

situations that have arisen affecting the

health of the people in the whole world. Right

from April, 2020, orders are being issued by

the Central and State Governments in

relaxation of orders on lock down, having

regard to the situation prevailing in the WP(C).No.29032 OF 2020(D)

country, based on the opinion of the experts

in the field. It can be noticed that as far

as Kerala is concerned, the number of positive

cases in the state even as on today is more

than 5000. Apart from that reports are there,

as to cases affected by new variants of Corona

Virus while steps are afoot for starting

vaccination also. Both the central and State

government are striving for the revival of the

pre-covid state, step by step. The contention

of the petitioner relying on Article 14 of the

Constitution of India is absolutely untenable.

              I     am    of     the    view    that       when   the

    authorities,          who     are    equipped          with   the

expertise in these matters are issuing orders

relaxing the restrictions at regular

intervals, a decision as to when the schools

can start functioning in its full swing,

protecting the interest of all concerned would WP(C).No.29032 OF 2020(D)

also be issued by them, in accordance with the

prevailing conditions. In order to protect the

right of the children, Government has already

taken possible steps by conducting classes

through digital media. There is no reason for

any doubt that Government would not come

forward with orders for re-opening of the

Schools as and when the situation becomes

normal/ ensuring the protection of the health

of the children. Therefore I am of the

considered view that interference by this

Court under Article 226 is absolutely

unwarranted.

                The     writ     petition          is     accordingly

    dismissed.                                             Sd/-

                                                         P.V.ASHA
                                                           JUDGE
    ww
 WP(C).No.29032 OF 2020(D)






                            APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1           G.O. (RT.) NO.947/2020/DMD DATED 24.11.2020
                     ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P1(A)        TRUE TRANSLATION OF EXHIBIT P1.

EXHIBIT P2           REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED

21.12.2020 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT THROUGH EMAIL.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter