Monday, 20, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sunny Cherian vs The Electoral Officer
2021 Latest Caselaw 496 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 496 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2021

Kerala High Court
Sunny Cherian vs The Electoral Officer on 7 January, 2021
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                          PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR

                             &

            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL

 THURSDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 17TH POUSHA, 1942

                      WA.No.38 OF 2021

AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 22.12.2020 IN WP(C) 27583/2020(W) OF
                    HIGH COURT OF KERALA


APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS:


      1     SUNNY CHERIAN,AGED 54 YEARS
            S/O.CHERIAN, KUTTIPPURATHU HOUSE,
            KATTAPPANA P.O, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN 685 808.

      2     REJI THOMAS,AGED 49 YEARS
            S/O. THOMAS, AMBATTU HOUSE, UPPUKANDAM P.O,
            IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN 685 514.

      3     MATHEW JOSEPH,AGED 60 YEARS
            S/O. JOSEPH, PULIKKATHAZHE, KADAMAKKUZHI P.O,
            IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN 685 515.

      4     P.J THOMAS,AGED 66 YEARS
            S/O. JOSEPH, PORUNNOLIL, KATTAPPANA P.O,
            IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN 685 508.

      5     JOY THOMAS, AGED 65 YEARS
            S/O. THOMAS, POOVATHUMOOTTIL, KOZHIMALA P.O,
            IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN 685 511.

      6     BHAVANA SUBHASH,AGED 55 YEARS
            W/O. SUBHASH, MARIPPURATH, VELLAYAMKUDI P.O,
            IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN 685 515.
 W.A.No.38 of 2021               2




       7       P.S MARYDASAN,AGED 59 YEARS
               S/O.SEBASTIAN, PANDYAMAKKAL, KATTAPPANA P.O,
               IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN 685 508.

               BY ADVS.SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI (SR.)
               SMT.S.AMBILY
               SRI.SAJI THOMAS
               SHRI.MICKY THOMAS

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

       1       THE ELECTORAL OFFICER,
               ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF KATTAPPANA
               RURAL DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO.
               1591 KATTAPPANA P.O, IDUKKI DISTRICT,
               PIN 685 508.
               (ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
               (GENERAL), OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF
               CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL),
               NAYARUPARA P.O, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN 685 602)

       2       THE STATE COOPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION
               OFFICE OF THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION,
               VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695 033.

       3       KATTAPPANA RURAL DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATIVE
               SOCIETY LTD NO 1-591,KATTAPPANA P.O,
               IDUKKI, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

       4       THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (RULING FRONT)
               KATTAPPANA RURAL DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATIVE
               SOCIETY LTD. NO. 1-591, KATTAPPANA P.O.,
               IDUKKI, PIN 685 508
               REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.

       5       M.J VARGHESE, AGED 64 YEARS
               S/O. JOSEPH, MUTHUPLACKAL HOUSE,
               EZHUKUMVAYAL P.O, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN 685 583.

       6       K.R SODHARAN, AGED 65 YEARS
               S/O. RAMAN, KANJIRAMUKALIL, KATTAPPANA SOUTH
               P.O, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN 685 515.
 W.A.No.38 of 2021               3




       7       K.N CHANDRAN, AGED 58 YEARS
               S/O. NARAYANAN, KARIMPANATHOTTIYIL,
               THOVARAYAR P.O, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN 685 511

       8       JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERTIVE SOCIETIES
               (GENERAL), PAINAVU P.O, IDUKKI, PIN 685 603.

       9       THE SECRETARY, KATTAPPANA RURAL DEVELOPMENT
               CO-OEPRATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO. 1-591,
               KATTAPPANA P.O, IDUKKI, PIN 685 508.

       10      STATE OF KERALA,
               REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL SECRETARY,
               CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

               R1 & R2 BY S.C.SRI.R.LAKSHMI NARAYANAN
               R3, R4 & R9 BY S.C.SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN
               R8 & R10 BY G.P.SRI.RENIL ANTO KANDAMKULATHY

     THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
07.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 W.A.No.38 of 2021                   4




                              JUDGMENT

Ravikumar, J.

This intra-court appeal is directed against the interim order

dated 22.12.2020 in W.P.(C)No.27583 of 2020. The writ petitioners are

the appellants. They filed the writ petition mainly seeking quashment

of Ext.P5 Government Order dated 23.4.2020 extending the period of

Board of Directors of various Co-operative Societies up to January, 2021

and seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus or appropriate writ

commanding the first respondent viz., the Electoral Officer to remove

the names of the members of the third respondent Co-operative Society

as contained in Ext.P22 from the final voters' list published by the first

respondent in connection with the election to the Board of Directors of

the third respondent scheduled as per Exts.P6 and P7. They also

sought declarations on the following lines:-

"e) To declare by the issuance of appropriate writ, order or direction that the 3rd and 4th respondents are incompetent to take Ext.P7(a) resolution requesting the 2nd respondent to conduct election to the Board of Directors of the 3rd respondent.

f) To declare by the issuance of appropriate writ, order or direction that the third and 4th respondents have no competence to admit new members with voting right

to the third respondent on the basis of the extension of the period of the committee as per Ext.P5;

g) To declare by the issuance of appropriate writ, order or direction that the enblock enrollment of members to the 3rd respondent Society as contained in Exts.P16 and P22 without complying with the provisions contained in Section 16 of the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act 1969 and Rule 16 of the Kerala Cooperative Societies Rules 1969 is illegal and therefore to quash Exts.P16 and P22 by the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari or such other appropriate writ order or direction ."

By way of an interim relief they prayed thus:-

"For the reasons stated in the writ petition and in the affidavit accompanying thereto, it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings by respondents 1 & 2 for conducting election to the Board of Directors of the 3 rd respondent Society scheduled on 10.01.2021 pursuant to Exts.P6 & P7 during the pendency of the above writ petition before this Hon'ble Court."

The learned Single Judge after hearing the arguments of the learned

counsel on both sides declined to grant the interim relief sought for, as

per the impugned order dated 22.12.2020. This appeal is preferred in

the said circumstances.

2. Heard the learned Senior Counsel Sri.K.K.Chandran Pillai

for the appellants, Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, the learned counsel appearing

for respondent Nos.3, 4 and 9, learned Standing Counsel Sri.R.Lakshmi

Narayanan for respondent Nos.1 and 2 as also the learned Government

Pleader.

3. Ext.P6 is the election notification dated 24.11.2020

issued by the 2nd respondent. Going by the same, election to the

Managing Committee of the third respondent society is to be held on

10.1.2021 from 9 a.m. onwards. Prayer No.(d) in the writ petition itself

would reveal that after issuing a preliminary voters' list in the matter of

conduct of election to the Managing Committee of the third respondent

a final voters' list was also published. The counter affidavit filed in the

writ petition on behalf of respondents 4 to 7 would reveal that the final

voters' list was published on 5.12.2020. These facts are not in dispute.

As noticed hereinbefore, in terms of Ext.P6 election notification election

is scheduled to be held on 10.1.2021. The impugned interim order

passed by the learned Single Judge would reveal that taking into

account the nature of the allegations the Writ Court prima facie arrived

at the conclusion that disputed questions of fact involved for resolution

in the writ petition and they could not be gone into in the writ petition

at present. Taking note of the aforesaid situations as also the decisions

of the Hon'ble Apex Court in S.S.S.J.S. (M.M.) S.D.U. Sanstha v.

State of Maharashtra (AIR 2001 SC 3982), Shaji K. Joseph v.

V.Viswanath [(2016) 4 SCC 429] and Shri Sant Sadguru

Janardan Swami (Moingiri Maharaj) Sahakari Dugdha Utpadak

Sanstha and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. [(2001) 8 SCC

509] the learned Single Judge declined to pass an interim order as

sought for, virtually, holding that once the election process was

commenced the same shall not be interfered with. We may hasten to

hold that though this Court would be loathe to interfere with an election

process once it is commenced there is no inflexible or invaluable

position interdicting interference with an election process. The

pleadings in this appeal and the writ petition would reveal that the

appellants allege illegality in the matter of extension of the term of

Managing Committees of Co-operative Societies beyond five years as

per Ext.P5 and according to them, the third and fourth respondents got

no competence to admit new members with voting right to the third

respondent society during the extended period of the term. Essentially,

they allege non-compliance with the statutory provisions for enrollment

of members and also allege enmasse enrollment in blatant violation of

the prescribed procedures. The appellants also allege non-consideration

of objections raised by them against the preliminary voters' list.

Virtually, the appellants want to disfranchise a large number of

members whose names figured not only in the preliminary voters' list

but also in the final voters' list and that is why they seek removal of

names of members of the third respondent contained in Ext.P22 from

the final voters' list. The tenor of the pleadings in the writ petition as

also in the writ appeal would undoubtedly go to show that the

appellants are fully aware of the publication of the final voters' list. In

this context, it is to be noted that there is no challenge against the final

voters' list and it is also not produced either in the writ petition or in the

writ appeal. Be that as it may, the indisputable position is that election

is scheduled as per Ext.P6 to be held on 10.1.2021 and in that regard in

terms of the election notification preliminary voters' list as also final

voters' list were published. Ineligibility of a large number of members

of the third respondent society to be eligible for voting is under

challenge raising enmasse enrollment in flagrant violation of the

statutory provisions governing enrollment.

4. Upon hearing the learned Senior Counsel appearing for

the appellants and going through the pleadings in this appeal as also in

the writ petition we do concur with the learned Single Judge that fact

finding exercise to certain extent requires to fix the tenability of the

allegations raised. To what extent such exercise is possible or

permissible in view of the nature of the allegations with supporting

materials is certainly a matter initially for the Writ Court to consider.

The observations and findings of the learned Single Judge in the

impugned interim order can only be taken as prima facie conclusions

and findings arrived at for the purpose of deciding the entitlement of

the appellants to the interim relief sought for. In view of the fact that

the main prayer in the writ petition is for quashment of Ext.P5 whereby

the term of the committee of the third respondent as also all the Co-

operative Societies was extended beyond the period of five years, to be

precise, for a period of five years and six months and consequential

declaration is also sought for to the extent that the third and fourth

respondents were incompetent to admit members into the third

respondent society during the extended period, we are of the

considered view that the conduct of the election as scheduled by itself

would not defeat the case and contentions of the appellants. Certainly,

depending on the fate of challenge against the competency to extend

the term of Co-operative Societies as has been done under Ext.P5 the

legality of enrollment effected during the extended period as also the

right to cast votes by such enrolled members have to be decided.

Several contentions were raised based on various statutory provisions

before us. However, taking note of the aforesaid position as also the

fact that a probe into such matters and any observation or finding

would leave nothing for decision in the writ petition, we are of the view

that without entertaining such contentions at this stage and in view of

the pendency of the writ petition it is only befitting to leave the entire

matter to be decided in the writ petition, however, making it clear that

the entire proceedings including the conduct of election would be

subject to the result of the writ petition. Ordered accordingly.

The Writ Appeal stands disposed of as above.

Sd/-

C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge

Sd/-

K.HARIPAL Judge

TKS

APPENDIX APPELLANTS'ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE-1 COPY OF CIRCULAR NO.E(2)27/2011/SCES(CIRCULAR NO.07/2011) DATED 21.10.2011 OF THE COOPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION.

ANNEXURE-2 COPY OF CIRCULAR NO.E(2)399/2011/SCES(CIRCULAR NO.09/2012) DATED 10.07.2012 OF THE COOPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION.

ANNEXURE-3 COPY OF LETTER NO C R B. 3931/2020 DATED 10.11.2020 OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-

OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, IDUKKI.

ANNEXURE-4          COPY OF LETTER NO 930/2020 DATED 21.12.2020 OF
                    THE   ASSISTANT    REGISTRAR  OF   COOPERATIVE
                    SOCIETIES, IDUKKI.




TKS
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter