Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P.Vijayakumar vs Corporation Of Kochi
2021 Latest Caselaw 345 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 345 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2021

Kerala High Court
P.Vijayakumar vs Corporation Of Kochi on 6 January, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH

    WEDNESDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021/16TH POUSHA, 1942

                      WP(C).No.16540 OF 2020(N)


PETITIONER:

               P.VIJAYAKUMAR, S/O. RAMANKUTTY KAIMAL,
               AGED 58 YEARS, METHAYIL HOUSE,
               EDAPPILLY NORTH, ERNAKULAM-682 024.

               BY ADVS.
               SRI.AADITHYAN S.MANNALI
               SRI.SAJAN MANNALI

RESPONDENTS:

      1        CORPORATION OF KOCHI,
               C/O. OFFICE OF CORPORATION OF KOCHI,
               PARK AVENUE ROAD, BOAT JETTY,KOCHI,
               PIN-682 011, REP BY ITS SECRETARY.

      2        SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF KOCHI,
               C/O. OFFICE OF CORPORATION OF KOCHI,
               PARK AVENUE ROAD, BOAT JETTY,
               KOCHI, PIN-682 011.

               R1-R2 BY SMT.SAREENA GEORGE,SC,COCHIN CORPORATION

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD          ON
06.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C)No.16540/2020

                                2




                          JUDGMENT

Dated this the 6th day of January, 2021

The writ petition has been filed by a Contractor who

has undertaken work on behalf of Corporation of Kochi,

seeking to quash Ext.P6 and to direct the respondents to

pay an amount of `10,54,478/- to the petitioner.

2. The fact that the petitioner has successfully

completed the work is not in dispute. The case of the 1 st

respondent is that the 1st respondent is facing financial

crunch and amounts can be released only in accordance

with seniority in claims. The Corporation has already drawn

a seniority list of Contractors to whom the amounts are due,

taking into account the date of completion of work. Bills

have already been paid by the Corporation, for the works

completed by 31.08.2017. The petitioner will be paid

amounts due on the basis of his seniority. WP(C)No.16540/2020

3. When this writ petition came up for admission,

this Court took into account the submission of the petitioner

that his daughter's marriage is due on 06.09.2020.

Accordingly, this Court by way of interim order dated

14.08.2020 directed the respondents to release the first and

second bills presented by the petitioner within two weeks.

The learned counsel for the 1st respondent would submit

that the first bill for `1,37,535/- and the second bill

amounting to `3,96,650/- was paid to the petitioner on

03.09.2020 pursuant to the interim order of this Court.

4. Again when this writ petition came up for hearing

on 19.10.2020, the respondents were directed to release

the third bill submitted by the petitioner for an amount of

`1,33,135/-. The said amount has also been paid. Now the

petitioner contends that the petitioner's wife Mrs. Geetha

M.P is suffering from Guillian barre syndrome which is an

acute demyelinating disease and is undergoing treatment

and the petitioner requires substantial amount for the WP(C)No.16540/2020

treatment of his wife. Therefore a further direction may be

given to the 1st respondent to honour the fourth and fifth bill

of the petitioner or atleast a portion of the amount may be

released.

5. I have heard the learned counsel for the

petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the

respondents.

6. The petitioner has already been paid a

substantial amount of the outstanding as per the interim

directions of this Court. The stand of the Corporation of

Kochi is that they have to honour the seniority list of the

Contractors drawn on the basis of completion of work for

making payment. In the circumstances, this Court finds that

the petitioner can raise a legal grievance only if the seniority

list is overlooked in making payment. Therefore no further

relief can be granted by this Court in this writ petition.

7. However taking into account the medical

emergency pointed out by the petitioner evidenced by WP(C)No.16540/2020

Ext.P7 Medical Certificate, this Court is of the view that the

petitioner may approach respondents 1 and 2 who may

consider the situation faced by the petitioner and grant

appropriate relief to the petitioner, as is permissible.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH JUDGE ncd WP(C)No.16540/2020

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1           A TRUE COPY OF THE INVITATION CARD
                     RELATING    OT     THE  PETITIONERS
                     DAUGHTERS MARRIAGE

EXHIBIT P2           A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE
                     OBTAINED   FROM    COCHIN   MUNICIPAL
                     CORPORATION DATED 22.6.2020

EXHIBIT P3           THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE

PETITIONER TO CORPORATION OF KOCHI, DATED 202 MARKED AS EXT P3

EXHIBIT P4 THE REPRESENTATION TO CORPORATION OF KOCHI BY COCHIN MUNICIPAL CORPORATION CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION DATED 24.6.2020 MARKED AS EXT P4

EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.C 13626/2020 DATED 7TH JULY 2020

EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 05.08.2020 AFTER CONSIDERING EXT 3 REPRESENTATION

EXHIBIT P7 A TRUE COPY OF DISCHARGE SUMMARY AND INVOICE OF THE PETITIONER'S WIFE DATED 09/12/2020

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter