Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2982 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 7TH MAGHA, 1942
Crl.MC.No.5333 OF 2020(F)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMP 1297/2020 OF SESSIONS
COURT,KOTTAYAM
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CMP 8208/2019 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
OF FIRST CLASS,VAIKOM
CRIME NO.991/2019 OF THALAYOLAPARAMBU POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 9:
1 SARALA, AGED 67 YEARS, D/O LATE UNNIYALAN, KOTTITHARA
HOUSE, VADAKARA P.O, VELLOOR, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM - 686
609
2 KAMALASANAN, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O LATE UNNIYALAN,
KOTTITHARA HOUSE, VADAKARA PO, VELLOOR, VAIKOM,
KOTTAYAM - 686609
3 CHITHRABHANU, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O LATE UNNIYALAN,
KOTTITHARA HOUSE, VADAKARA PO, VELLOOR, VAIKOM,
KOTTAYAM - 686 609
4 ANILKUMAR, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O LATE UNNIYALAN,
KOTTITHARA HOUSE, VADAKARA PO, VELLOOR,
VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM - 686 609
5 SARADA, AGED 58 YEARS, D/O LATE UNNIYALAN,
KOTTITHARA HOUSE, VADAKARA PO, VELLOOR, VAIKOM,
KOTTAYAM - 686 609
6 SUDHEESH KUMAR, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O LATE UNNIYALAN,
KOTTITHARA HOUSE, VADAKARA PO, VELLOOR, VAIKOM,
KOTTAYAM - 686 609
7 SUKUMARAN, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O KARTHAVU,
KOTTITHARAVEETTIL, VADAKARA PO, VELLOOR,
VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM - 686 609
8 ABHILASH, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O SARALA, KOTTITHARA
HOUSE, VADAKARA PO, VELLOOR, VAIKOM,
KOTTAYAM - 686 609
9 MANOJ, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O KRISHNANKUTTY,
KANNAMPALLY VEETTIL, VADAKARA PO,
Crl.MC.No.5333 OF 2020(F) 2
VELLOOR, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM - 686 609
BY ADV. SMT.RESMI NANDANAN
RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT & STATE:
1 AMMINI, AGED 56 YEARS, D/O NARAYANAN, KOLLATTU
HOUSE, VADAKARA, VELLOOR, VAIKOM,
KOTTAYAM - 686 609
2 STATE OF KERALA, REP BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH
COURT OF KERALA - 682 031
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.E.C.BINEESH
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
27.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No.5333 OF 2020(F) 3
ORDER
The accused Nos.1 to 9 came up against the
registration of crime alleging offences under Sections
120B,191,192,193,420,465,467,468,471 and 474 r/w 34 of
IPC. The original complaint submitted before the
Magistrate was referred under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
and caused to register a crime for the abovesaid
offences. A partition deed was executed in between
accused Nos.1 to 9 excluding the defacto complainant,
hence the complaint. None of the offence will stand
attracted by the exclusion of one of the co-owner in
executing a partition deed by the remaining co-owners.
At the most it will attract only a civil liability.
Hence the crime registered and final report, if any,
submitted will stand quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Crl.M.C. is allowed accordingly.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN
JUDGE
msp
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE CMP.NO.8208/2019
ANNEXURE B A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 2.11.2020 IN CRL.M.P.NO.1297/2020
ANNEXURE C CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR.NO.0991/2019
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!