Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Aiswarya Vinayan vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 2757 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2757 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2021

Kerala High Court
Aiswarya Vinayan vs State Of Kerala on 25 January, 2021
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

                                   &

                 THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA

      MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 5TH MAGHA, 1942

                         WP(Crl.).No.4 OF 2021


PETITIONER/S:

                AISWARYA VINAYAN,
                AGED 28 YEARS,
                D/O. VINAYA KUMAR, RESIDING AT AREDATH HOUSE,
                PUTHIYARA P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 004.

                BY ADV. SMT.MAJIDA.S

RESPONDENT/S:

      1         STATE OF KERALA,
                REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME
                DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
                THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

      2         SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
                MEDICAL COLLEGE POLICE STATION, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O.,
                KOZHIKODE-673 008.

      3         MANJULA,
                W/O. SAINATH, PALLIKKADATH PARAMBA, EDAKKAD P.O.,
                KUNDUPARAMBA, KOZHIKKODE-673005.

      4         MEENA,
                PALLIKKADATH PARAMBA, EDAKKAD P.O., KUNDUPARAMBA,
                KOZHIKODE-673 005.

                R1-2 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.B.RAMANAND




     THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(Crl.).No.4 OF 2021

                                      2

                                  JUDGMENT

Dated this the 25th day of January 2021

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

Petitioner is concerned with her father, who is said

to be missing and who is said to have left the house with

the ornaments of the petitioner. To enable her to file

the above writ petition she also submits that her father

is in the illegal custody of the party respondents.

2. The Police have filed a report in which it is

stated that, on 23.11.2019, petitioner's father was found

missing and the petitioner's mother had registered a

complaint. On investigation it was revealed that there

was a quarrel in the house, after which the missing

person left the house. On 25.11.2019, the missing person

himself turned up before the Medical College Police

Station and his statement was recorded. It was also

stated by him before the Police that he had left the

house because of the mental and physical torture

inflicted on him by his wife.

3. Later again, the wife of the alleged detenue

instituted a complaint on 01.01.2020. At that point also WP(Crl.).No.4 OF 2021

the missing person turned up at the Medical College

Police Station and gave a similar statement. Later the

petitioner, who is the daughter of the missing person

instituted a complaint on 24.12.2020, alleging that her

ornaments were taken away by her father. The police

during investigation was reliably informed that certain

ornaments were pledged by the father of the petitioner.

The police are proceeding with the investigation and are

also attempting to trace out the whereabouts of the

missing person.

4. Learned Counsel for the complainant submits

that, there is a statement made by the police that her

father along with his mother went to the K.S.F.E to renew

the loan, but on perusal of the register maintained

there, it does not show the grand mother of the

petitioner having visited K.S.F.E on the said date. The

Police have merely reported, what the mother of the

missing person told them and it is for the Police to

verify the same in the investigation. However, that does

not detract from the fact that there is no question of

any illegal detention of the missing person since the WP(Crl.).No.4 OF 2021

Police categorically say that there is nothing to show

that the party respondents have illegally detained the

petitioner's father.

5. On complaints made by the petitioner's mother

twice, the missing person had turned up at the Police

Station and gave categoric statements that he has left

the house due to the physical and mental torture

inflicted on him by his wife and daughter. It was also

categorically stated by him that they wanted to take him

to Bangalore where his daughter is residing, with

ulterior motives.

In such circumstances, we do not find any cause for

issuing a Writ of Habeas Corpus. We find that the Writ

Petition itself is a clear abuse of process of Court and

dismiss it accordingly.

Sd/-

K.VINOD CHANDRAN

JUDGE

Sd/-

M.R.ANITHA

JUDGE

uu/25.01.2021

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter