Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

A.Sari Antony vs The State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 2741 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2741 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2021

Kerala High Court
A.Sari Antony vs The State Of Kerala on 25 January, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

      MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 5TH MAGHA, 1942

                      WP(C).No.40745 OF 2018(P)


PETITIONER:

               A.SARI ANTONY
               AGED 39 YEARS
               WIFE OF JOSEPH JOHN, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT,
               C.M.UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, THOZHIYOOR, CHAVAKKAD
               EDUCATIONAL SUB DISTRICT, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

               BY ADVS.
               SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED
               SRI.M.SAJJAD

RESPONDENTS:

      1        THE STATE OF KERALA
               REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL
               EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT ANNEXE-II,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

      2        THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,
               JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014.

      3        THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
               CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680506.

      4        THE CORPORATE MANAGER,
               MALABAR INDEPENDENT SYRIAN CHURCH EDUCATIONAL
               SOCIETY, THOZHIYUR-680520, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

      5        THE HEADMISTRESS,
               C.M.UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, THOZHIYOOR, CHAVAKKAD,
               THRISSUR DISTRICT-680520.

               R1-3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER



               SRI. SUNIL KUMAR KURIAKOSE (GP)

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
25.01.2021, ALONG WITH WP(C).1762/2019(U), THE COURT ON THE SAME
DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C)Nos.40745/2018 & 1762/2019

                                  2

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

     MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 5TH MAGHA, 1942

                       WP(C).No.1762 OF 2019(U)


PETITIONER:

               A.SARI ANTONY
               AGED 39 YEARS
               WIFE OF JOSEPH JOHN, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL
               ASSISTANT, C.M. UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, THOZHIYOOR,
               CHAVAKKAD EDUCATIONAL SUB DISTRICT, THRISSUR
               DISTRICT.

               BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED

RESPONDENTS:

      1        STATE OF KERALA
               REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
               GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT ANNEXE-
               II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001

      2        THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION
               JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014

      3        THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
               CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 506

      4        THE CORPORATE MANAGER
               MALABAR INDEPENDENT SYRIAN CHURCH EDUCATIONAL
               SOCIETY, THOZHIYUR-680 520, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

      5        THE HEADMISTRESS
               C.M. UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, THOZHIYOOR, CHAVAKKAD,
               THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 520

               R1-3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
25.01.2021, ALONG WITH WP(C).40745/2018(P), THE COURT ON THE
SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C)Nos.40745/2018 & 1762/2019

                                            3

                                     JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is stated to be

working as an Upper Primary School Teacher in

the services of C.M.Upper Primary School,

Thozhiyoor, Thrissur - of which the 4th

respondent is the Corporate Manager - has

filed both these writ petitions seeking

corollary reliefs and I, therefore, dispose

of the same together.

2. As per the petitioner, she was a

Rule 51A claimant under the Kerala Education

Rules (KER for short) and was granted

reappointment on 01/06/2007, as is evident

from Ext.P4 order in both these cases. She

says that though her appointment was directed

to be approved, through Ext.P5 judgment, by

this Court - which was confirmed by Ext.P5(a)

judgment of a learned Division Bench - she

was granted such benefit only with effect

from 01/06/2011, by including her in the

'Teachers Package'.

WP(C)Nos.40745/2018 & 1762/2019

3. The petitioner asserts that as long

as Exts.P5 and P5(a) judgments are in force,

she is entitled to get salary from 01/06/2007

and not from 01/06/2011; and asserts that

Government has virtually undone her right

accrued from the year 2005, by issuing Ext.P9

order in W.P(C)N.1762 of 2019.

4. The petitioner contends that Ext.P9

order is illegal, since she was appointed

from 28/10/2005 against a regular post, which

was approved through the Government Order

produced as Ext.P1 in W.P(C)No.1762 of 2019.

5. The petitioner further says that as

per Exts.P5 and P5(a) judgments, her

approval had been directed to be granted with

effect from 01/06/2007, but that she has been

given such benefit only from 01/06/2011; and

therefore, prays that both these writ

petitions be allowed and the Government be

directed to approve her appointment with

effect from 01/06/2007, thus leading to the WP(C)Nos.40745/2018 & 1762/2019

grant of pay and allowances from that date.

6. The petitioner substantiates her

plea relying on Ext.P8(a) judgment, produced

along with W.P(C)N.40745 of 2018, whereby,

another learned Judge of this Court had

directed the Government to consider her

statutory revision for these benefits; and

asserts that in spite of this, it has been

rejected through Ext.P9 order in

W.P(C)No.1762 of 2019.

7. I have heard Shri.M.Sajjad, learned

counsel appearing for the petitioner and the

learned Government Pleader, Shri.Sunil Kumar

Kuriakose, appearing for the official

respondents.

8. The learned Government Pleader

submits that Ext.P9 in W.P(C)No.1762 of 2019

cannot be faulted, since Government has

considered all the relevant aspects and have

found that the petitioner is not entitled to

be approved with effect from 01/06/2007 but WP(C)Nos.40745/2018 & 1762/2019

only from 01/06/2011, by including her in the

'Teachers Package'. He, therefore, prays that

these writ petitions be dismissed.

9. When I consider the afore

submissions, it is indubitable that Exts.P5

and P5(a) judgments have now become final;

and obviously, therefore, Government was

bound to consider its impact before Ext.P9

order in W.P(C)No.1762 of 2019 could have

been issued.

10. However, even on a close reading of

the said order, it does not show that any

such consideration has been properly made and

the petitioner's approval has been rejected

with effect from 01/06/2007, saying that she

is entitled only to be approved with effect

from 01/06/2011, by including her in the

'Teachers Package'.

11. Though there are several reasons

this Court can point out why Ext.P9 cannot be

approved, I propose not to record them in WP(C)Nos.40745/2018 & 1762/2019

this judgment, so that Government can

reconsider the matter, taking specific note

of the directions in Exts.P5 and P5(a)

judgments, since specific declarations have

already been made therein in favour of the

petitioner that she is entitled for approval

based on Ext.P2 order of appointment produced

therein.

12. Suffice to say, since the petitioner

claims to be Rule 51A claimant under the KER,

on account of an earlier approved service in

the School Ext.P9 cannot find my favour and

it is clear that these aspects have not been

properly considered therein.

In the afore circumstances, I order these

writ petitions and set aside Ext.P9 in

W.P(C)No.1762 of 2019 and direct the

Government to reconsider the claim of the

petitioner specifically in terms of the

directions in Exts.P5 and P5(a)judgments of

this Court and after affording an opportunity WP(C)Nos.40745/2018 & 1762/2019

of being heard to her, as well as the Manager

of the School - either physically or through

video conferencing - thus culminating in an

appropriate order thereon, as expeditiously

as is possible, but not later than three

months from the date of receipt of a copy of

this judgment.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

JUDGE

MC/29.1.2021 WP(C)Nos.40745/2018 & 1762/2019

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 40745/2018 PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 28.10.2005 AND APPROVAL THEREOF.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT.)NO.709/09/GE DATED 12.2.2009 OF THE GOVERNMENT.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 14.7.2006 AND APPROVAL THEREOF.

EXHIBIT P3A TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 13.9.2006 AND APPROVAL THEREOF.

EXHIBIT P3B TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 9.2.2007 AND APPROVAL THEREOF.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 1.7.2007 AND APPROVAL THEREOF.

EXHIBIT P4A TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.

(RT.)NO.5596/2011/G.EDN. DATED 15.12.2011 OF THE GOVERNMENT.

EXHIBIT P4B TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B1-868/12/K.DIS.

DATED 23.3.2012 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P4C TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.H2/14582/2012/DPI DATED 3.10.2012 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P4D TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.F-01/2007-08 DATED 1.6.2007 OF THE MANAGER.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.NO.24758/2010-T DATED 8.2.2012.

EXHIBIT P5A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A.NO.783/2014 DATED 4.11.2014.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.NO.22917/2012-L DATED 20.11.2012.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER WP(C)Nos.40745/2018 & 1762/2019

NO.EC5/1337/2013/DPI/K.DIS. DATED 20.3.2013 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN WPC.NO.8594/2013-Y DATED 1.4.2013.

EXHIBIT P8A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.NO.8594/2013DATED 9.2.2018.

EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.GEDN-

B3/125/2018-G.EDN. DATED 13.6.2018 OF THE GOVERNMENT.

EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.

(RT.)NO.4536/2018/G.EDN. DATED 1.11.2018 OF THE GOVERNMENT.

WP(C)Nos.40745/2018 & 1762/2019

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 1762/2019 PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 28.10.2005 AND APPROVAL THEREOF.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE G.O (RT) NO. 709/09/GE DATED 12.2.2009 OF THE GOVERNMENT.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 14.07.2006 AND APPROVAL THEREOF.

EXHIBIT P3A TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 13.09.2006 AND APPROVAL THEREON.

EXHIBIT P3B TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 09.02.2007 AND APPROVAL THEREON.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 01.07.2007 AND APPROVAL THEREON.

EXHIBIT P4A TRUE COPY OF THE G.O (RT) NO.

5596/2011/G.EDN. DATED 15.12.2011 OF THE GOVERNMENT.

EXHIBIT P4B TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. B1-868/12/K.DIS DATED 23.3.2012 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P4C TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.

H2/14582/2012/DPI DATED 03.10.2012 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P4D TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO. F-01/2007-08 DATED 01.06.2007 OF THE MANAGER.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.

24758/2010-T DATED 8.2.2012

EXHIBIT P5A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A. NO.

783/2014 DATED 04.11.2014

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.

22917/2012-L DATED 20.11.2012

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. WP(C)Nos.40745/2018 & 1762/2019

EC5/1337/2013/DPI/K.DIS. DATED 20.3.2013 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.P.(C) NO. 8594/2013-Y DATED 01.04.2013

EXHIBIT P8A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.

8594/2013 DATED 09.02.2018

EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(RT) NO. 36/2019/G.EDN.

DATED 04.01.2019 OF THE GOVERNMENT.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter