Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2391 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL
THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 1ST MAGHA, 1942
Con.Case(C).No.2161 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 23869/2020
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 23869/2020(G) OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD EMPLOYEES FRONT,
NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003,
REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY,
N.PREMKUMAR,
S/O K.N.NARAYANAN NAIR.
BY ADV. SRI.K.R.SUNIL
RESPONDENTS:
1 DR. VISWAS MEHTA,
FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
CHIEF SECRETARY, CHAIRMAN, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001.
2 K.R.JYOTHY LAL,
FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
SECRETARY, REVENUE (DEVASWOM) DEPARTMENT,
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT ANNEX,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001.
3 GAYATHRI DEVI,
FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
SECRETARY, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHANCODE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001.
4 T.K.JOSE,
ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY,
HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001.
5 DR. RAJAN N.KHOBRAGADE,
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
HEALTH AND FW DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
Contempt Case No. 2161 of 2020
2
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001.
6 LOK NATH BEHRA,
STATE POLICE CHIEF, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 21.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
Contempt Case No. 2161 of 2020
3
JUDGMENT
Ravikumar, J.
This contempt petition has been filed alleging
willful violation of disobedience of the directions of this Court
issued under judgment dated 18-12-2020 in W.P.(C). No.
23869 of 2020. Admittedly, in compliance with the directions
to permit 5000 devotees per day to have "darshan" during the
Sabarimala pilgrimage especially during the "Makaravilakku"
season, the authorities have permitted the said number of
persons. The grievance of the petitioner is that there occurred
some delay in the matter of granting such permission.
2. We are of the view that, it itself cannot be a reason
for holding that there is a willful disobedience to comply with
the directions of the judgment. In view of the admitted position
as noted above, we do not think that proceedings under the
Contempt of Court Act need be initiated in this case at the
instance of the petitioner.
Contempt Case No. 2161 of 2020
Accordingly, this contempt petition is closed, recording the
factum of compliance with the direction in the judgment in W.P.(C).
No. 23869 of 2020.
Sd/-
C.T. RAVIKUMAR JUDGE
Sd/-
K. HARIPAL JUDGE
SSK/21/01 //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE Contempt Case No. 2161 of 2020
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 18.12.2020 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP(C) NO.23869/2020.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!