Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bindu B.K. vs Dinak.K
2021 Latest Caselaw 2385 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2385 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2021

Kerala High Court
Bindu B.K. vs Dinak.K on 21 January, 2021
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                   PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

                                      &

                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

     THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 1ST MAGHA, 1942

                         OP (FC).No.400 OF 2020

         AGAINST THE COMMON ORDER IN I.A.NO.1806/2019 AND
     1.A.NO.1803(A)/2019 IN O.P.NO.1003/2015 DATED 07.02.2020
                    OF FAMILY COURT, KOZHIKODE
                             -------------


PETITIONER/S:

                BINDU B.K., D/O. B.K.C. UNNI (LATE), AGED 42 YEARS,
                BHAGAVATHIKALATHIL (H), VALLUVAMBRAM P.O.,
                MALAPPURAM, PIN-673 642.

                BY ADVS.
                SMT.K.K.PREETHA
                SRI.R.K.PRASANTH

RESPONDENT/S:

      1         DINAK.K, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.KAMALAKARAN (LATE),
                GA-RC IV, SILVER SPRINGS, CHALI, MANKAVU, KOZHIKODE
                DISTRICT, PIN-673 007.

      2         RATNAMAYI ARANGIL, AGED 74 YEARS,
                W/O.KAMALAKARAN (LATE), GA-RC-IV, SILVER SPRINGS,
                CHALI, MANKAVU, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-673 007.

      3         DEEPAK K., AGED 52 YEARS, S/O. KAMALAKARAN (LATE),
                EDEL WEIS FLATS, FLAT NO.D2, KADAVANTHRA P.O.,
                VIDHYANAGAR, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 020.

                R1, R3 BY ADV. SRI.BASANT BALAJI

THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21.01.2021
ALONG WITH O.P.(FC) NO.9/2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
 O.P.(FC) Nos.400/2020 & 9/2021    2




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                 PRESENT

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

                                      &

                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

     THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 1ST MAGHA, 1942

                          OP (FC).No.9 OF 2021

        AGAINST THE COMMON ORDER IN I.A.NO.1806/2019 AND
  1.A.NO.1803(A)/2019 IN O.P.NO.1003/2015 IN O.P.NO.07/2015 IN
    O.P.NO.1082/2016 AND IN MC NO.314/2015 DATED 07.02.2020
                   OF FAMILY COURT, KOZHIKODE

PETITIONER/S:

       1        DINAK K., AGED 46 YEARS,
                S/O. LATE KAMALAKARAN, GA-RCIV, SILVER SPRINGS,
                CHALI, MANKAVU, KOZHIKODE-673 007.

       2        RATNAMAYI ARANGIL, AGED 74 YEARS,
                W/O.LATE KAMALAKARAN, GA-RCIV, SILVER SPRINGS,
                CHALI, MANKAVU, KOZHIKODE-673 007.

       3        DEEPAK K., AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.LATE KAMALAKARAN,
                EDEL WEIS FLATS, FLAT NO.D2, KADAVANTHRA P.O.,
                VIDHYANAGAR, ERNAKULAM-682 020.

                BY ADV. SRI.BASANT BALAJI

RESPONDENT/S:

                BINDU B.K.,
                D/O. LATE B.K.C UNNI,
                BHAGAVATHIKALATHIL (H),
                VALLUVAMBRAM P.O.,
                MALAPPURAM-673 642.


THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21.01.2021 ALONG WITH O.P.(FC) NO.400/2020, THE COURT ON THE
SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 O.P.(FC) Nos.400/2020 & 9/2021     3




                                 JUDGMENT

Dated this the 21st day of January 2021

A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.

These original petitions are filed challenging a common

order in an interlocutory application in O.P.No.1003/2015 on

the file of the Family Court, Kozhikode. This matter has been

tagged along with the connected matter for joint trial. We are

not referring to the issues involved before the Family Court.

The matter now arises consideration in regard to dismissal of

an application for sending a document for expert opinion. The

respondents denied the contents of a greeting card during the

cross examination before the Family Court. The said greeting

card was produced before the Family Court. The petitioner,

thereafter, filed an application to send the same for an

expert opinion in regard to the content. That application has

been dismissed.

2. We do not find any reason to interfere with the order

passed in the interlocutory application. If the petitioner is

finally prejudiced by such order, she is free to challenge the

same along with the decree to be passed in the matter.

3. We, in exercise of power under Article 227 of the

Constitution cannot interfere with the order passed in the

interlocutory applications on merits. It is to be noted that

it is open for the Family Court to consider sending the

document for expert opinion if the Family Court at a later

stage of the trial feels that such expert opinion is required.

Accordingly, both the original petitions are dismissed.

Taking note of the fact that the original petitions are

pending before the Family Court since 2015, the Family Court

shall consider and dispose of the same at the earliest.

Sd/-

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

JUDGE

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS

JUDGE

ln

APPENDIX OF O.P.(FC) NO.9 OF 2021 PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PETITION NO.1003/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOZHIKODE.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE IA NO.1806/2019 IN OP NO.1003/2015.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO IA 1806/2019.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE IA NO.1803(A) IN OP NO.1003/2015.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT TO IA 1803(A).

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DTD 07.02.2020 IN IA NO.1803(A) AND IA NO.1806/2019 IN OP NO.1003/2015 IN OP NO.07/2015 IN OP 1082/2016 AND M.C NO.314/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOZHIKODE.

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL.

//TRUE COPY//

P.A.TO JUDGE

APPENDIX OF O.P.(FC) NO.400 OF 2020 PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE OP NO.1003/15 ON THE FILE OF THE FAMILY COURT KOZHIKODE DATED 3.7.2014.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE GREETING CARD DATED 29.6.2013 GIVEN TO THE PETITIONER BY THE IST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE IA NO.1806/2019 IN O.P.1003/2015 DATED 1.11.2019.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER STATEMENT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT TOWARDS EXHIBIT P3 DATED 30.12.2019.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1803(A)/2019 DATED 9.12.2019.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER STATEMENT IN IA 1803(A)/2019 DATED NIL.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER OF THE FAMILY COURT JUDGE, KOZHIKODE IN IA 1803(A) & IA NO.1806/2019 IN O.P. 1003/2015 DATED 7.2.2020.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS :NIL.

//TRUE COPY//

P.A.TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter