Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 206 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2021
WP(C).No.14925 OF 2017(S) -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 15TH POUSHA, 1942
WP(C).No.14925 OF 2017(S)
PETITIONER/S:
SUNEER ISMAIL
AGED 39 YEARS,S/O.P.M.ISMAIL,PUTHENCHIRA PUTHEN
VEEDU,THIRUMALA WARD,CHUNGAM,ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADV. SRI.J.OM PRAKASH
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORAITON LTD
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING
DIRECTOR,PALAYAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695076.
2 THE SHOP IN CHARGE
THE KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LTD,OUTLET
NO.04012,CHUNGAM,ALAPPUZHA PO-688502.
3 THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF
ALAPPUZHA PO-688501.
4 THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
ALAPPUZHA SOUTH PO,PIN-688502.
5 THE ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,ALAPPUZHA PO,PIN-
688501.
R1-2 BY SRI.NAVEEN.T., SC, KERALA STATE BEV.CO. M.
AND M.
R3-4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER
R5 BY SHRI.R.AZAD BABU, SC, ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.T.NAVEEN, SC FOR R1 AND R2, SRI. TEK CHAND, SR
GP FOR R3 AND R4, SRI.R.AZAD BABU, SC FOR R5
WP(C).No.14925 OF 2017(S) -2-
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
05.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.14925 OF 2017(S) -3-
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 5th day of January, 2021
S. Manikumar, C. J.
Challenging the functioning of a beverages outlet without
obtaining license from the Municipality, instant writ petition has been
filed seeking the following reliefs:-
"i) To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing respondents 1 & 2 to close down the outlet functioning in the building No. 9/627 of the Alappuzha Municipality forthwith.
ii) To direct the respondents 3 & 4 to withdraw the police protection granted to the outlet of the respondents functioning in building Nos. 9/627 immediately.
iii) To direct the respondents 1 & 2 to pay the cost to the petitioner."
2. Mr. J. Omprakash M. A., learned counsel for the petitioner
submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous.
Placing on record the submission of the learned counsel for the
petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
S. MANIKUMAR CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE
Eb
///TRUE COPY///
P. A. TO JUDGE
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 24.4.2017 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 26/4/2017.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!