Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ayisha vs The Land Tribunal
2021 Latest Caselaw 1768 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1768 Ker
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2021

Kerala High Court
Ayisha vs The Land Tribunal on 18 January, 2021
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                             PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN

 MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 28TH POUSHA, 1942

                     WP(C).No.467 OF 2021(G)


PETITIONERS:

      1        AYISHA
               AGED 63 YEARS
               W/O KUNHIMUHAMMED,
               PALLIYALIL, KUTTIPPURAM,
               TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

      2        RUKHIYA
               AGED 64 YEARS
               W/O MUHAMMED MUSTHAFA, PARAMMEL HOUSE,
               KUTTIPPURAM, TIRUR,
               MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

               BY ADVS.
               SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN
               SRI.T.R.TARIN
               SRI.V.A.VINOD

RESPONDENTS:

      1        THE LAND TRIBUNAL
               REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR,(LR),
               TIRUR-676101.

      2        THE SPECIAL THAHSILDAR
               (LAND REFORMS),LAND TRIBUNAL, TIRUR,
               MALAPPURAM-676101.

      3        THE VILLAGE OFFICER
               EDAYOOR VILLAGE OFFICE, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM-
               679552.

               SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY-SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
18.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 WP(C)No.467 of 2021

                                  2

                             JUDGMENT

The petitioners have filed this writ petition under Article 226

of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus

commanding the 1st respondent Land Tribunal to consider and

dispose of S.M.No.1371/2020 on the file of the said respondent,

within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The suo motu

proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirur under Rule 5 of

the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970,

is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the

landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala

Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of

purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of

the said Rules, in respect of 6.88 Ares of land comprised in

Re.Sy.No.416/152 of Edayoor Village in Tirur Taluk in

Malappuram District.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also

the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the

respondents.

3. In Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special

Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another [Judgment dated WP(C)No.467 of 2021

14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases]

this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious

disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for

obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised

the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the

Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious

disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a

routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing

the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would

result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending

before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to

dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration

of such cases.

5. In Narayanan Namboodiri, this Court noticed that

by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of

Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the

jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of

the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of

the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by WP(C)No.467 of 2021

the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action

necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said

Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the

reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court,

the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the

cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land

Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in

some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on

the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases

co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such

persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this

Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions.

Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus;

"2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal:

(i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land WP(C)No.467 of 2021

Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained.

(ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months.

(iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority.

(iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications.

(v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above.

(vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other WP(C)No.467 of 2021

cases, the directions shall be strictly followed.

(vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment." (underline supplied)

6. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village

Officer, Edayoor Village, the Land Tribunal, Tirur initiated suo

motu proceedings as S.M.No.1371/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P3

certificate dated 10.12.2020, for assignment of the right, title

and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under

Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance

of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read

with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred

to hereinbefore.

7. The learned counsel for the petitioners would point out

that the 1st petitioner is a senior citizen aged 63 and the 2 nd

petitioner is a senior citizen aged 64. The learned Senior

Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of

suo motu proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirur is 4987.

8. Having considered the submissions made by the

learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land WP(C)No.467 of 2021

Tribunal, Tirur can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.1371/2020

following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan

Namboodiri, referred to supra.

9. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by

directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of

S.M.No.1371/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the

directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in

Narayanan Namboodiri, referred to supra.

No order as to costs.

Sd/-

ANIL K. NARENDRAN JUDGE

yd WP(C)No.467 of 2021

APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS PROPERTY DATED 2.11.2020.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SUO-MOTO REPORT FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN SM NO.1371/2020.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 10.12.2020.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL

TRUE COPY

P.A. TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter