Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1612 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 January, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 25TH POUSHA, 1942
OP(KAT).No.18 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OA (EKM) NO.1790/2020 OF KERALA
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 IN OA(EKM):
1 STATE OF KERALA
REP.BY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME
DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001, KERALA
2 THE STATE POLICE CHIEF
VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 014, KERALA
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ANTONY MUKKATH
RESPONDENT/APPLICANT IN O.A(EKM):
M.R.MADHUBABU
S/O.M.K.RAGHAVAN, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
NARCOTIC CELL, ALUVA 683 101, ERNAKULAM
RESIDING AT VAISAKH, CHENNERKARA P.O.,
PATHANAMTHITTA, KERALA 689 503
R1 BY ADVS. SRI.K.JAJU BABU (SR.)
SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN
THIS OP KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 15.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
OP(KAT).No.18 OF 2021
2
ALEXANDER THOMAS & T.R.RAVI, JJ.
=============================
O.P (KAT) No.18 of 2021
[Arising out of order dated 18.12.2020
in O.A.(EKM) No.1790 of 2020 of KAT, Tvm. Bench]
=============================
Dated this the 15th day of January, 2021
JUDGMENT
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
The aforecaptioned Original Petition (KAT) has been filed under
Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers:
"..... ..... ..... to set aside Exhibit P3 interim order dated 18.12.2020 in OA(EKM) No.1790/2020 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram, by allowing this Original Petition."
2. Heard Sri.Antony Mukkath, learned Senior Government
Pleader appearing for the petitioners (State of Kerala and the State Police
Chief) in the O.P./respondents in the O.A. before the Tribunal and Sri.Jaju
Babu, learned Senior counsel instructed by Sri.Brijesh Mohan, learned
counsel appearing for the sole respondent in the O.P./sole applicant in the
O.A. before the Tribunal.
3. The sole respondent herein/original applicant before the
Tribunal has filed Ext.P1 O.A.(Ekm) No.1790/2020 before the Kerala
Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench with the following reliefs: OP(KAT).No.18 OF 2021
"(i) Declare that the inaction on the part of 1 st respondent in taking a decision on Annexure-A1 application submitted by the applicant seeking sanction for acting in an Art Film is arbitrary, illegal and unsustainable;
(ii) Direct the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Annexure-A1 application and grant the sanction sought for therein forthwith;
(iii) Issue such other and further reliefs as this Hon'ble Tribunal deem fit and proper."
4. After hearing both sides, the Tribunal has passed Ext.P3
interim order dated 18.12.2020 in the said O.A.(Ekm) No.1790/2020,
which reads as follows:
"The learned Government Pleader submits that a decision could not be taken due to the local body elections and that immediate orders would be passed.
2. The learned counsel for the applicant points out that as evidenced from Annexure-A3 two days time alone is required to complete his role in the film and the applicant is not accepting any payment for the same and the film is made with a social message which would not in any way defame the Police Department.
3. In view of the above and considering the fact that only two days is required for the applicant to complete his role in the file, the 1 st respondent is directed to permit the applicant to complete the film and to grant sanction either on 20th or 21st December, 2020 for the above purpose.
Post on 06.01.2021.
Handover to both sides."
5. It is this interim order at Ext.P3 rendered by the Tribunal on
18.12.2020 in O.A.(Ekm) No.1790/2020, that is under challenge in this
Original Petition (KAT) filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution
of India at the instance of the abovesaid petitioner/respondents in the O.A.
As can be seen from a mere reading of Ext.P3 interim order dated
18.12.2020 in O.A.(Ekm) No.1790/2020, that the said order is only an
interlocutory order, which is subject to the result of the O.A. Ordinarily in
such cases, if the respondents in the O.A. had any serious and substantial OP(KAT).No.18 OF 2021
grievance, then they could have easily approached the Tribunal either by
filing a review application or in a case where the respondent authorities
concerned are advised that such a plea may not fall within the province of
review, then certainly nothing will preclude the authorities concerned from
filing a miscelleneous application before the Tribunal seeking for
appropriate modification of the interim order. If the endeavour in that
regard fails and the matter is serious and the respondent authorities are
advised by the learned Advocate General, etc., that the matter could be
subject matter of challenge under Articles 226 & 227, then it is
understandable that in such cases, the respondent authorities in the O.A.
may seek the option of filing the petition as in the instant one. It is without
resorting to any of these courses of action, that the respondents have
straightaway rushed to this Court by filing the aforesaid Original Petition.
Further, we are now apprised by Sri.Jaju Babu, learned Senior counsel
instructed by Sri.Brijith Mohan appearing for the sole respondent in the
O.P./original applicant before the Tribunal, that subsequently the original
applicant was advised not to seek or press for the leave application and that
he had acted in the aforesaid art/parallel movie on Christmas day (public
holiday on 25.12.2020) without having to take leave at all. Further that the
above said crucial aspect that the original applicant is not pressing for the OP(KAT).No.18 OF 2021
leave application and that consequently is not pressing for implementation
of the impugned Ext.P3 interim order, was also made known by him
through his counsel by filing a miscelleneous application M.A.(Ekm)
No.29/2021 in the said O.A.(Ekm) No.1790/2020 before the Ernakulam
Bench of the Tribunal on 04.01.2021 and the matter had come up before
the Tribunal on 05.01.2021. Along with the said M.A.(Ekm) No.29/2021,
the original applicant is stated to have produced Annexure A9, which is a
copy of the applicant's letter dated 19.12.2020 addressed to the 1 st
petitioner herein (Additional Chief Secretary to Government in the Home
Department) and the said Annexure A9 letter dated 19.12.2020 reads as
follows:
"19th December, 2020
The Additional Chief Secretary to Government of Kerala, Home Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram-695 001.
Ref: Order of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram (Ernakulam Bench) dated 18.12.2020 in O.A.(Ekm) No.1790/2020.
Respected Sir,
Enclosed please find Order of the Hon'ble Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram (Ernakulam Bench) dated 18.12.2020 in O.A. (Ekm) No.1790/2020 filed by me. My application seeking permission and leave to act in a Movie is pending from 30.7.2020. Now, the Hon'ble Tribunal has given direction to permit me to complete the Film for which sanction is to be given on 20th or 21st December, 2020.
The Producer and Director of the Movie have informed that the Film is to be censored before 31.12.2020 and my role can be finished within a day.
It is therefore humbly requested that the permission and sanction to OP(KAT).No.18 OF 2021
act and complete the role in the Film may be given on 20 th or 21st December, 2020 (in case of any difficulty in giving sanction on 20 th and 21st December, 2020 I will be satisfied if sanction is given on 22nd and 23rd December, 2020.
For favourable consideration and immediate orders.
Yours Sincerely, Sd/-
M.R.Madhubabu Deputy Superintendent of Police, Narcotic Cell, Aluva, Ernakulam."
6. As aforesaid, it is brought to the notice that the said
miscelleneous application No.29/2021 has come up for consideration
before the Tribunal on 16.01.2021 and we are told by the Senior Counsel
appearing for and on behalf of the original applicant that the Tribunal had
then directed the learned Government Pleader concerned to furnish factual
instructions to the Tribunal in the said O.A. It appears that the present
O.P.(KAT) has been filed before this Court on 14.01.2021. None of the
above said details borne out from the above said Miscelleneous Application
No.29/2021 and Annexure A9 produced therewith has been averred in this
O.P.(KAT). Presumably, this could be only on account of the fact that the
competent authorities concerned may not have furnished factual
instructions to the learned Government Pleader concerned.
7. We need not get into any of these issues, except to observe that
in view of the aforesaid subsequent developments, which have happened in
this matter and as the original applicant has not pressed for the leave OP(KAT).No.18 OF 2021
application or for enforcement of the impugned interim order at Ext.P3
dated 18.12.2020 in O.A.(Ekm) No.1790/2020, the matter in issue raised
before us has become practically infructuous and redundant.
8. We hasten to add that, what we have observed is only that the
matter in issue posed before this Court has become infructuous and if there
is any subsisting issues, then it is for the parties concerned to approach the
Tribunal to resolve any such issues which then may be resolved by the
Tribunal, in the manner known to law.
Hence it is ordered that the above Original Petition (KAT) will stand
dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE
Sd/-
T.R.RAVI, JUDGE
Pn
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!