Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1542 Ker
Judgement Date : 14 January, 2021
Crl.M.C.28/2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V.
THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 24TH POUSHA, 1942
Crl.MC.No.28 OF 2021(C)
IN LP 189/2014 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS - I,
KARUNAGAPPALLY
CRIME NO.9/2006 OF Ochira Police Station, Kollam
PETITIONER/ACCUSED
RAMACHANDRAN
AGED 55 YEARS
S/O. RAGHAVAN, CHIRAMEL VADAKKATHIL HOUSE,
VALIYAKULANGARA P.O., KARAYMA KIZHAKKU MURI,
MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA-690 104.
BY ADVS.
SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE(PERUMPALLIKUTTIYIL)
SRI.A.R.DILEEP
SRI.P.J.JOE PAUL
SRI.MANU SRINATH
SRI.RAJAN G. GEORGE
RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA
THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER, OACHIRA POLICE
STATION, REPRESENTED BY PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA.
2 BABY
D/O. JANAKI, VANNALLOOR THEKKATHIL HOUSE, PRAYAR
THEKKUM MURI, CLAPPANA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY,
KOLLAM-690 518.
R2 BY ADV. JACOB P.ALEX
OTHER PRESENT:
AJITH MURALI -P.P
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.M.C.28/2021
2
ORDER
Dated this the 14th day of January 2021
This petition under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure is filed by the 1st accused in C.C.
No.955 of 2006 on the file of the Judicial First Class
Magistrate, Karunagappally arising from FIR No. 9 of 2006
of Oachira Police Station registered for the offences
punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 341, 448 and 34 of
Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was absconding at the
time of trial and the case against him was renumbered as
C.C. No. 875 of 2013 (Re-numbered as L.P. No. 189 of 2014)
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for
the petitioner that the parties have settled their entire
disputes among themselves and as such there is no
subsisting dispute between them. Therefore, this petition
is filed to quash Annexure 2, FIR No. 9 of 2006 of Oachira
Police Station and Annexure 3 final report in C.C. No. 875
of 2013 (L.P. No. 189 of 2014) on the file of the Judicial
Magistrate of First Class, Karunagappally.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the 2nd
respondent/defacto complainant has submitted that she has Crl.M.C.28/2021
no objection in allowing the petition. Annexure 8 is the
affidavit sworn to by her in support of the submission
of the petitioner. The affidavit further indicates that
she has no intention to pursue the matter further and the
parties have resolved their entire dispute.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor has reported that
the prosecution has no serious objection in allowing the
petition. It is also submitted that as the dispute has
been amicably settled, the possibility of conviction is
remote and bleak and therefore, no useful purpose would
be served in proceeding with the case.
6. On hearing the submissions of all concerned,
on perusal of the records as well on consideration of the
special facts and circumstances involved in this case,
I find that no fruitful purpose is likely to be served by
proceeding with the matter against this petitioner.
Moreover, no public interest is involved in the case and
there is no legal impediment in granting the prayer as
sought for by the petitioner. Therefore, for the purpose of
securing the ends of justice, this Crl.M.C. is only to be
allowed.
For the foregoing reasons, Annexure 2, FIR No. 9
of 2006 of Oachira Police Station and Annexure 3 final Crl.M.C.28/2021
report in C.C. No. 875 of 2013 (L.P. No. 189 of 2014) on
the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class,
Karunagappally will stand quashed as prayed for exercising
the inherent powers of High Court under Section 482 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure.
Sd/-
SHIRCY V.
JUDGE
sb Crl.M.C.28/2021
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE 1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE COMPLAINT CMP NO.15598/2005 DATED 27.12.2005 FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, KARUNAGAPPALLY.
ANNEXURE 2 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR NO.9/2006 LODGED BEFORE THE OACHIRA POLICE STATION.
ANNEXURE 3 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET FILED AGAINST THE ACCUSED.
ANNEXURE 4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 2.4.2013 IN C.C.NO.955/2006 BEFORE THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, KARUNAGAPPALLY.
ANNEXURE 5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPROMISE PETITION DATED 16.5.2018 FILED BY THE PETITIONER AND THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN E.P.NO.27/2016 IN O.P.NO.432/2014 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA.
ANNEXURE 6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 16.5.2018 IN O.P.NO.432/2014 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA.
ANNEXURE 7 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.4.2019 IN O.P.(HMA) NO.1149/2018 OF THE FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA.
ANNEXURE 8 THE TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIFDAVIT DATED 2.12.2020 EXECUTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!