Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1469 Ker
Judgement Date : 14 January, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 24TH POUSHA, 1942
RP.No.704 OF 2020 IN WA. 2251/2019
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WA 2251/2019 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
DATED 28.02.2020
REVIEW PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS 1 & 4/PETITIONERS 1&4:
1 PRASAD N.S., AGED 47 YEARS
S/O SIVARAMAN N.S, ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD,
TRANSMISSION CONSTRUCTION SECTION,
ERUMELY, 110 KV SUB STATION, KANAKAPPALAM,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 686509,
RESIDING AT NIVARATHIL HOUSE,
KARIKATTOOR CENTRE.P.O, KOTTAYAM.
2 SHAJU.M.V, AGED 48 YEARS
S/O.M.A.VARGHESE, ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD.,
220 KV SUB STATION, KALLIPPADAM.P.O, SHORANUR,
PALAKKAD-679 122, RESIDING AT MUKRAPPILLY HOUSE,
P.O.KORATTY SOUTH, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 308.
BY ADVS.
SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON
SMT.KAVERY S THAMPI
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS :
1 THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD.,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 004.
2 THE CHAIRMAN,
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004.
RP.No.704 OF 2020 IN WA. 2251/2019
2
3 THE CHIEF ENGINEER(HRM),
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD,
VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 004.
4 JOSHI N.ISAC,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD.,
ELECTRICAL SECTION NO.1, THODUPUZHA,
IDUKKI DISTRICT - 686 584.
5 SHEEBA KARIM,
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION,
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD.,
UPHILL, MALAPPURAM-676 505.
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.01.2021,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RP.No.704 OF 2020 IN WA. 2251/2019
3
ORDER
Shaffique, J
The review petition has been filed, inter alia , stating
that there is an error apparent on the face of the record.
The learned counsel specifically refers to grounds D, F
and G. On going through the grounds raised, virtually
what the petitioner seeks is for a re-hearing of the
appeal, which is not warranted. Hence, this review
petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE
sd/-
MARY JOSEPH, JUDGE AMV/14.01.2021 RP.No.704 OF 2020 IN WA. 2251/2019
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.EB2/RE/04-05 OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,ELECTRICAL DIVISION,ERNAKULAM TO THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER,ELECTRICAL CIRCLE,ERNAKULAM DATED 4.4.2004.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS : NIL
TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!