Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Benjamin Saju George vs The Regional Officer
2021 Latest Caselaw 1446 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1446 Ker
Judgement Date : 14 January, 2021

Kerala High Court
Benjamin Saju George vs The Regional Officer on 14 January, 2021
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT

                THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

    THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 24TH POUSHA, 1942

                     WP(C).No.23725 OF 2020(M)


PETITIONER:

              BENJAMIN SAJU GEORGE
              AGED 21 YEARS
              S/O.SAJU GEORGE C., CHERUVATHUR HOUSE, NEAR ORTHODOX
              CHURCH, UCC P.O., ALUVA, ERNAKULAM-683 102

              BY ADVS.
              SRI.M.J.SANTHOSH
              SRI.M.P.ITTIACHAN

RESPONDENTS No.1 & 2:

      1       THE REGIONAL OFFICER.
              CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, REGIONAL
              OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, BLOCK -B, LIC DIVISIONAL OFFICE
              CAMPUS, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 004

      2       THE PRINCIPAL
              THE CHOICE SCHOOL (O6640/75099), THRIPUNITHURA,
              ERNAKULAM DIST-682 301

              R1 BY SRI.NIRMAL S., SC, CBSE

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C).No.23725 OF 2020(M)

                                      2




                               JUDGMENT

Dated this the 14th day of January 2021

The petitioner is challenging the rejection of his

application for correction of the name of his parents

in the examination records, Exts.P1 to P3.

2. The petitioner passed his 10th standard in the

year 2015. After under going his study in the 2 nd

respondent's School, he appeared in the Secondary

School Examination. In the certificates, Exts.P1 to

P3, issued by the CBSE, the name of his father is shown

as 'SAJU GEORGE' and that of his mother is shown as 'P

LEENA KUMARI'. In the Birth certificate of the

petitioner, Ext.P4, the name of the parents are shown

as ' SAJU GEORGE C' and 'P LEENA KUMARI' respectively.

The petitioner submitted an application for correction

of the examination records, which was rejected as per

Ext.P10 on the ground that the provisions contained in

the Examination-Bye-Laws would not permit the same.

The petitioner also produced the 'Aadhaar Card', Ext.P5

and the School records of his father and mother, WP(C).No.23725 OF 2020(M)

Exts.P6 and P7, apart from the Election identity cards

Exts.P8 and P9 in respect of the claim for correction.

3. The learned Standing counsel for the 1st

respondent has filed a statement re-iterating the

contents of Ext.P10. It is stated that as per the

amended Bye-laws, clause 69.1(i), the correction of the

name of parents is allowed only if there is a court

order and that can be only before the publication of

the results of the candidates. It is further stated

that, as per Clause 69.1(i) the correction envisaged is

in respect of typing errors and if the application is

submitted along with all relevant documents. It is

stated that, on the basis of Birth certificate issued

subsequent to the publication of results of the

petitioner, the correction can not be allowed.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as

well as the learned Standing counsel appearing for the

respondents.

5. It is seen that the petitioner has approached

the respondents within the permissible time. Exts.P1

to P3 certificates were issued in the year 2015 and WP(C).No.23725 OF 2020(M)

2017 and the application was submitted on 24.02.2020.

The request has been made on the basis of the

certificates issued by the statutory authorities. On

the basis of such entries, the respondents can not

reject the application on the ground that Ext.P4 was

issued subsequent to the publication of results.

In the above circumstances, Ext.P10 order passed by

the 1st respondent is set aside. There shall be a

direction to the 1st respondent to re-consider the

application of the petitioner and to see that

correction is effected in tune with the request made in

the application as well as in tune with the entries in

the Birth certificate, Ext.P4 within a period of two

months from the date of receipt of a copy of the

judgment.

The Writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

Sd/-

P.V.ASHA JUDGE DM WP(C).No.23725 OF 2020(M)

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF MARK LIST OF THE SECONDARY SCHOOL EXAMINATION OF THE PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF 'SENIOR SCHOOL CERTIFICATE EXAMINATION' OF THE PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF 'PASS CERTIFICATE' OF SENIOR SCHOOL CERTIFICATE EXAMINATION OF THE PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE COPY OF BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P5 THE TRUE COPY OF AADHAR CARD OF THE PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P6 THE TRUE COPY OF EXTRACT OF SCHOOL RECORDS OF THE PETITIONER'S MOTHER

EXHIBIT P7 THE TRUE COPY OF SSLC BOOK OF THE PETITIONER'S FATHER

EXHIBIT P8 THE TRUE COPY OF ELECTION IDENTITY CARD OF THE PETITIONER'S MOTHER

EXHIBIT P9 THE TRUE COPY OF ELECTION IDENTITY CARD OF THE PETITIONER'S FATHER

EXHIBIT P10 THE TRUE COPY OF ORDER OF 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 28.9.2020

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS : NIL

//TRUE COPY//

PA TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter