Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

State Of Kerala vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 1211 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1211 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2021

Kerala High Court
State Of Kerala vs State Of Kerala on 13 January, 2021
O.P.(KAT) No.359 of 2020           1




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                   PRESENT
               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
                                       &
                     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
    WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 23TH POUSHA, 1942
                           OP(KAT).No.359 OF 2020
AGAINST THE ORDER IN OA (EKM) 1144/2018 OF KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE
     TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (CAMP SITTING, ERNAKULAM)
PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS IN OA:
       1     STATE OF KERALA
             REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
             TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001, KERALA.

         2         THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER,
                   TRANSPORT COMMISSIONERATE 2ND FLOOR,
                   TRANS TOWER, VAZHUTHACAUD,
                   THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 014.

         3         THE CONVENER,
                   DEPARTMENT PROMOTION COMMITTEE,
                   HIGHER MOTOR VEHICLES DEPARTMENT
                   2ND FLOOR, TRANS TOWERS VAZHUTHACAUD,
                   THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 014.

                    BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR
RESPONDENT/APPLICANT IN OA:
             BIJU ISAC
             AGED 47 YEARS
             S/O.E.A. ISSAC, MOTOR VEHICLE INSPECTOR,
             OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER,
             CENTRAL ZONE II, ERNAKULAM 682 020,
             RESIDING AT ERALIL HOUSE,
             NEAR BOYS HIGH SCHOOL, PERUMBAVOOR 683 542.
                    BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU (SR.)
                    BY ADV. SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI
                    BY ADV. SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN

     THIS OP KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY
HEARD ON 13.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 O.P.(KAT) No.359 of 2020                   2




                  ALEXANDER THOMAS & T.R. RAVI, JJ.
                   ------------------------------------------------
                         O.P.(KAT) No.359 of 2020
                     --------------------------------------------------
                  Dated this the 13th day of January, 2021
                                      JUDGMENT

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.

The prayer in the aforecaptioned Original Petition (KAT) filed under

Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, is as follows;

"..... ..... .... to set aside Exhibit P2 order in O.A.(E)No.1144/2018 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal by allowing this Original Petition."

2. Heard Sri T.Rajasekharan Nair, learned Senior Government

Pleader appearing for the petitioners in the original petition/respondents

in the OA before the Tribunal and Sri K.Jaju Babu, learned Senior Counsel,

instructed by Ms.T.S.Athira, learned counsel appearing for the respondent

in the original petition/original applicant before the Tribunal.

3. We had heard the parties in length on the previous two

occasions. On 06.01.2021, after hearing both sides, we have passed an

order in this case, which reads as follows;

"Both sides have been heard in extenso. Thereafter, Sri.T.Rajasekharan Nair, learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the petitioners seeks short time to get instructions from the competent authority of the State Government, including the Chief Secretary to Government, the Law Secretary and the Principal Secretary

to Government in the Transport Department, as to whether this original petition is being pressed or whether it can be closed as withdrawn or not pressed, etc.

2. Though only two days' time has been sought for on behalf of the petitioners, this Court would now give more time in that regard, in order to enable the responsible officers of the State Government, more particularly, the Chief Secretary to Government, the Law Secretary and the higher level competent authorities of the State Government, to furnish necessary instructions to the learned Senior Government Pleader in this matter.

List the case for judgment/orders at 10.15 a.m. On 12/01/2021."

4. Today, when the matter is being taken up for consideration,

Sri T.Rajasekharan Nair, learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for

the petitioners in the original petition/respondent in the OA would submit

on specific instructions that after having detailed discussions in the matter

with the competent authorities of the State Government in the higher level

as well as Principal Secretary to Government in the Transport Department

and the learned Advocate General, the Senior Government Pleader has

been instructed to submit that leave may be granted to the petitioners to

withdraw the above original petition. The learned Senior Government

Pleader has also submitted that he has received a letter

No.C3/244/2018-TRANS dated 13.01.2021 sent by the Principal Secretary

to Government in the Transport Department addressed to him, received by

fax, and a copy of the letter dated 13.01.2021 has been made available by

the learned Senior Government Pleader for perusal of this Court and the

said letter dated 13.01.2021 reads as follows;

"GOVERNMENT OF KERALA Transport (C) Department No.C3/244/2018-TRANS 13/01/2021, Thiruvananthapuram

From The Principal Secretary to Government To Sri.T.Rajasekharan Nair, Senior Government Pleader, O/o the Advocate General, Ernakulam.

Sir, Sub: Transport Department - OP(KAT)No.359/2020 against the final order in OA(EKM)No.1144/2018, filed by Sri.Biju Isac, MVI - reg:-

Ref: Your letter No.OP(KAT)No.359/2020 dated 08.01.2021. I am to invite your attention to the reference cited and to inform you that the OP(KAT)No.359/2020 filed against the final order in OA(EKM)No.1144/2018, filed by Sri.Biju Isac, Motor Vehicles Inspector, hereby withdrawn by the Government based on your instruction that the court is not satisfied with Appeal. It is also informed that the necessary direction is given to the Transport Commissioner to consider the case of Sri.Biju Issac to be placed before the next Departmental Promotion Committee (Lower).

Yours faithfully, Sd/-

JOSEPHINE K JOINT SECRETARY For Principal Secretary to Government."

5. The learned Senior Government Pleader would further submit

that the matter has now resulted in a contempt proceedings before the

Tribunal and that the Principal Secretary to Government and the

Governmental authorities concerned, more particularly, Principal

Secretary to Government in the Transport Department will be taking

immediate and earnest steps to ensure that the proceedings after Ext.P2

will be unconditionally withdrawn, that those proceedings have been

mainly issued not solely by the Principal Secretary to Government in the

Transport Department but by the Departmental Promotion Committee

concerned and that therefore, the matter will have to be placed for

consideration by the Departmental Promotion Committee, which consists

of not only the Principal Secretary to Government in the Transport

Department as its ex-officio Convener, but a member of the Kerala Public

Service Commission as its ex-officio Chairman as well as the Transport

Commissioner as the Head of the Department concerned, subordinate to

the Government and that therefore the said competent authorities

concerned including the Principal Secretary to Government in the

Transport Department would require 6 to 7 weeks to sort out all those

issues and to pass revised orders in faithful, proper and lawful compliance

of the directions issued by the Kerala Administrative Tribunal,

Thiruvananthapuram Bench as per the impugned Ext.P2 final order dated

06.06.2018 in O.A.(Ekm)No.1144 of 2018 and to ensure that the benefits of

Annexure A3 revised select list finalised by the Departmental Promotion

Committee concerned as early as on 21.03.2011 is effectuated in substance

and spirit. This Court had sought the response of the respondent

herein/original applicant, to which, Sri K.Jaju Babu, learned Senior

Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent would submit on specific

instructions furnished by the instructing counsel that the respondent will

not put forward any unnecessary objections, if the competent authorities

concerned including the Principal Secretary to Government in the

Transport Department seeks for time before the Kerala Administrative

Tribunal in the pending contempt proceedings in C.P.(Ekm)No.26 of 2019

(arising out of the impugned Ext.P2 order dated 06.06.2018 in O.A.

(Ekm)No.1144 of 2018 rendered by the said Tribunal), provided, the above

said submissions made on behalf of the competent authorities including

the Principal Secretary to Government in the Transport Department are

genuine and bonafide and not meant for the purpose of merely buying time

and to stultify the already concluded rights and interests of the

respondent/original applicant. Now that all what the petitioners seek for is

leave to withdraw the original petition, we would only observe that there

may not be any difficulty to grant leave to withdraw the original petition

and for its consequential dismissal and it is for the competent authority

concerned, more particularly, Principal Secretary to Government in the

Transport Department to approach the Kerala Administrative Tribunal,

who is in seizin of contempt proceedings (C.P.(Ekm)No.26 of 2019)

referred to in Ext.P4 and to convince the said Tribunal about the

seriousness and bonafides of the above said pleas and seek for time. If the

plea made by the competent authorities concerned, more particularly,

Principal Secretary to Government in the Transport Department is

bonafide, sincere and genuine, we have no doubt whatsoever that the

Tribunal would certainly examine those pleas, but of course after hearing

the original applicant/contempt petitioner/respondent herein. We have

already noted the fair submissions made by the learned Senior Counsel

appearing on behalf of the respondent herein/contempt petitioner/original

applicant based on the instructions furnished to him by his instructing

counsel, who indeed has secured instructions from the said party. In the

light of the above said submissions made by the petitioners, leave is

granted to them to withdraw the instant original petition.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the above original petition (KAT) will

stand dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE

Sd/-

T.R. RAVI, JUDGE

dsn

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE OA. (EKM) 1144/2018 ALONG WITH ANNEXURES.

ANNEXURE A1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. A4/17/TC/2011 DATED 27.12.2011 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 04.06.2010 IN WPC NO. 12341/2010 OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

ANNEXURE A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE REVISED SELECT LIST PUBLISHED AS PER PROCEEDING, NO.

A1/25912/TC/2010 (III), DATED 21.03.2011 BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE A4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 03.09.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE A5 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.

A6/E3568/C/2016 DATED 28.04.2017 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE A6 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25.05.2017 SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE A7 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD PROVING RECEIPT OF ANNEXURE A6 BY RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2.

EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 06.06.2018 IN OA (EKM) NO. 1144/2018 PASSED BY THE KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 05.11.2018 FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE R1 A TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER G.O. (RT) 491/18/TRANS DATED 03.11.2018.

EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED

08.082019 N C.P. NO. 26/2019 IN OA EKM, NO.

1144/2018.

ANNEXURE R1 A TRUE COPY OF THE CONFIDENTIAL REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

ANNEXURE R1 B TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 11.04.2019.

RESPONDENT'S EXTS:

EXHIBIT R1(A) TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION/ SELECT LIST VIDE NO A1/TC 23335/2000 DATED 6.4.2009 PUBLISHED BY THE STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY ON 19.5.2009

EXHIBIT R1(B) TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE REVIEW DPC HELD ON 21.7.2010

EXHIBIT R1(C) TRUE COPY OF THE WPC NO 27144/2010 FILED BY BIJU ISAC DATED 21.8.2010(WITHOUT EXHIBITS)

EXHIBIT R1(D) TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO DATED 4.1.2012 FILED BY BIJU ISAC IN WPC NO 27144/2010 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT

EXHIBIT R1(E) TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 9.1.2012 IN WPC NO 27144/2010 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT

EXHIBIT R1(F) TRUE COPY OF THE GO(RT) NO 233/2019/TRANS DATED 25.5.2019 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT

EXHIBIT R1(G) TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF ADHOC DPC HELD ON 14.5.2019

EXHIBIT R1(H) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.7.2019 IN CP(EKM) NO 26/2019 IN OA(EKM)NO.1144/2018 OF THE KAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM(ADDL.BENCH, ERNAKULAM)

EXHIBIT R1(I) TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 22.8.2019 IN OP(KAT)No.329/2019 OF THIS COURT.

EXHIBIT R1(J) TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT IN CP(EKM) NO 26/2019 IN OA(EKM) NO 1144/2018 DATED 17.5.2019 (WITHOUT ANNEXURES)

EXHIBIT R1(K) TRUE COPY OF THE GO(RT) NO 502/2019/TRANS DATED 29.10.2019 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT

EXHIBIT R1(L) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.11.2019 IN CP(EKM) 1144/2018 OF THE KAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (ADDL.BENCH,ERNAKULAM)

EXHIBIT R1(M) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 28.11.2019 IN CP(EKM) NO 26/2019 IN OA(EKM) 1144/2018 OF THE KAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (ADDL.BENCH,ERNAKULAM)

EXHIBIT R1(N) TRUE COPY OF THE GO(RT) NO 554/2019/TRANS DATED 9.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT

EXHIBIT R1(O) TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE ADHOC DPC MEETING HELD ON 9.12.2019

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter