Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P.R.Retnakumar vs The Managing Director
2021 Latest Caselaw 1160 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1160 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 January, 2021

Kerala High Court
P.R.Retnakumar vs The Managing Director on 12 January, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                     PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

    TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 22TH POUSHA, 1942

                           WP(C).No.1801 OF 2011(A)


PETITIONER:

               P.R.RETNAKUMAR, S/O G.P. RAMESH,
               AGED 47, OFFICE ASSISTANT,,
               TRAVANCORE CEMENTS LIMITED,
               NATTAKOM, KOTTAYAM,, PIN - 686 013.

               BY ADVS.
               SRI.V.C.JAMES
               SRI.GEORGE MECHERIL

RESPONDENTS:

      1        THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,
               TRAVANCORE CEMENT
               NATTAKOM, KOTTAYAM - 686 013.

      2        THE DEPUTY MANAGER (PERSONNEL)
               THE TRAVANCORE CEMENTS LIMITED,,
               NATTAKOM, KOTTAYAM - 686 013.

      3        KERALA CEMENTS LABOUR UNION C.I.T.U
               NATTAKOM, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS
               GENERAL SECRETARY, K.ANIL KUMAR - 686 013.

               R1   BY   ADV.   SRI.ALAN PAPALI
               R1   BY   ADV.   SMT.ANITHA MATHAI MUTHIRENTHY
               R1   BY   ADV.   SRI.GILBERT GEORGE CORREYA
               R1   BY   ADV.   SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE
               R1   BY   ADV.   SRI.P.K.VIJAYAMOHANAN

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD        ON
12.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WPC 1801/11
                                  2



                              JUDGMENT

There was no appearance for the petitioner

when this matter was called today.

I notice that this Writ Petition was filed

as early as in the year 2011 and has been

continuing on the files of this Court without

any interim orders being secured.

I am, therefore, of the view that on

account of efflux of time, this Writ Petition

has become infructuous.

However, since the petitioner is not

present, I deem it appropriate to dismiss this

Writ Petition for default. It is so ordered.

Sd/-

                                        DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
       RR                                          JUDGE
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter