Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1132 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 January, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 22TH POUSHA, 1942
Crl.MC.No.5658 OF 2020(F)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CP 26/2020 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST
CLASS-I, CHANGANACHERRY
CRIME NO.2495/2019 OF Changanassery Police Station , Kottayam
PETITIONERS:
1 ANEESH JOSEPH
AGED 39 YEARS
S/O. JOSEPH ANTONY, ILANJIPARAMBIL HOUSE, VEGITABLE
MARKET BHAGOM, VAZHAPPALLY EAST VILLAGE,
CHANGANACHERRY P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN-686 101.
2 VARGHESE JOSEPH
AGED 26 YEARS
S/O. JOSEPH SEBASTIAN, ILANJIPARAMBIL HOUSE,
VEGITABLE MARKET BHAGOM, VAZHAPPALLY EAST VILLAGE,
CHANGANACHERRY P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN-686 101.
3 ANOOP @ ANUROOP JOSEPH
AGED 35 YEARS
S/O. JOSEPH ANTONY, ILANJIPARAMBIL HOSUE, VEGITABLE
MARKET BHAGOM, VAZHAPPALLY EAST VILLAGE,
CHANGANACHERRY P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN-686 101.
BY ADV. SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 031.
2 SAM SANTHOSH
AGED 20 YEARS
S/O. SANTHOSH ANTONY, MULLARAMUNDACKAL HOUSE, FISH
MARKET BHAGOM, CHANGANACHERRY P.O., KOTTAYAM
DISTRICT, PIN-686 101.
R2 BY ADV. M.SANTHI (K/868/2011)
PP T.R.RENJITH
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
12.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crmc 5658/2020 2
V.G.ARUN, J.
===========================
Crl.M.C.No.5658 of 2020
===========================
Dated this the 12th day of January, 2021
ORDER
Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.2495 of 2019
registered at the Changanassery Police Station for the offence
punishable under Sections 341, 324, 294(b), 308 r/w 34 of IPC,
now pending as C.P.No.26 of 2020 of Judicial First Class
Magistrate-I, Changanassery. The de facto complainant at whose
instance the crime was registered is the 2 nd respondent.
Annexure II affidavit has been filed by the 2nd respondent,
stating that the dispute has been settled and that he has no
subsisting grievance against the petitioners. It is submitted that
CW2, who was also an injured person, is no more.
2. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor also, who, on
instructions, submits that the petitioners have no criminal
antecedents.
3. Having considered the gravity of the offences alleged,
nature of the injury caused and having perused the affidavit filed
by the 2nd respondent, the contents of which are submitted to be
true and voluntary, I am satisfied that the dispute is settled and
that no public interest is involved in this matter. Moreover, in
view of the settlement, possibility of the criminal proceedings
ending in conviction is remote. As such, continuance of the
proceedings will amount to an abuse of process of court and
hence, in view of the legal position set out by the Honourable
Supreme Court in Madan Mohan Abbot v. State of Punjab
[(2008) 4 SCC 582] and Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and
another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], there is no impediment in
granting the relief sought.
4. In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed. The proceedings in
C.P.No.26 of 2020 of Judicial First Class Magistrate-I,
Changanassery is quashed.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN JUDGE
lgk
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE 1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 27.2.2020 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, CHANGANACHERRY.
ANNEXURE II THE TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 7.12.2020 SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!