Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6806 Ker
Judgement Date : 26 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021/7TH PHALGUNA, 1942
WP(C).No.35196 OF 2015(Y)
PETITIONER:
K.RAVINDRAN, S/O.LATE KRISHNAN NAIR,
AGED 38 YEARS, KUNHIKKARA HOUSE, CHERKALA,
CHENGALA P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT,PIN 671 541.
BY ADVS.
SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA
SRI.P.T.ABHILASH
RESPONDENTS:
1 GOVERNMENT OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF
GOVERNMENT, GFOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
2 DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE,
CIVIL STATION, KASARAGOD 671 123.
3 CHENGALA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, CHENGALA P.O.,
KASARAGOD DISTRICT,PIN 671 541,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
4 ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEEER,
LSGD SUB DIVISION, KASARAGOD,PIN 671 121.
5 DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY,
DISTRICT COURT COMPLEX, KASARAGOD,PIN 671 123.
R1-R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. DEEPA NARAYANAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
26.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C)No.35196/2015
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 26th day of February, 2021
The petitioner who is Convener of a Beneficiary
Committee, approached this Court seeking to direct
respondents 1 to 4 to disburse the amount covered by
Ext.P4 bill to the petitioner forthwith, with interest at
minimum treasury rate with effect from 11.05.2011.
2. The petitioner would state that the work
entrusted to him was satisfactorily completed through the
Beneficiary Committee. From the pleadings and arguments
made at the Bar, it is evident that the work was completed
on 10.05.2011. The administrative sanction for the work
was issued only in 2014. It is for the reason that the
petitioner has satisfactorily completed the work even before
administrative sanction was given for the work, that the
respondents have taken objection. Completion of work by
the petitioner was inspected and certified in the year 2015 WP(C)No.35196/2015
and the respondents had found some defects in the work.
However by that time the defect liability period was over. It
was under such circumstances, the payment to the
petitioner was withheld.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the
respondents.
4. When this writ petition came up for hearing
today, the learned Government Pleader made available an
order dated 11.12.2014 issued by the District Collector,
Kasaragod. The decision of the District Collector is that
there is no objection for the payment of final bill amount to
the Beneficiary Committee without interest.
5. In the order dated 11.12.2014, the District
Collector has stated that the work was completed even
before administrative sanction was granted and the
concerned Panchayat Secretary is being proceeded against
for permitting such work without administrative sanction. WP(C)No.35196/2015
The Government has considered the entire issue and in the
facts of the case, has decided that the amount can be paid
to Convener of the Beneficiary Committee.
6. In the circumstances, I find that this writ petition
can be disposed of directing the respondents to disburse
the amount due to the petitioner under Ext.P4 bill without
interest within a period of six weeks.
It is made clear that the petitioner will be at liberty to
approach the competent forum if he has any claim for
interest. Any observation made in this judgment should not
be treated as pronouncement on merits, on the claim of the
petitioner for interest.
Sd/-
N. NAGARESH JUDGE ncd/26.02.2021 WP(C)No.35196/2015
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING DATED 20/12/2010 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DETAILED ESTIMATE PREPARED BY THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, LSGSD,CHENGALA SECTGION ATTACHED TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT PANCHAYAT.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT NO.14//2010-
11 DATED 23//12/2010 EXECUTED BETWEEEN THE PETITIONER AND 3RD RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE BILL PREPARED BY THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER UNDER THE 3RD RESPONDENT AND SIGNED BY THE ASSISTANT ENGINEEER AS WELL AS THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 11/5/2011
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 16/9/2011 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT FORWARDED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 21//10//2011 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT FORWARDED TO THE ASSISTANT DEVELOPOMENT COMMISSIONER KASARAGOD.
EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 9/11/2010
OF THE ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSIONER, KASARAGOD FORWARDED TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P7(a) TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING DATED 9/10/2012 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT FORWARDED TO THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 22/10/2011 ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT DEVELOPOMENT COMMISSIONER (GENERAL), KASARAGOD TO THE WP(C)No.35196/2015
PETITIONER
EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 8/12/2011 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT FORARDED TO THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 7/8/2013 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER
EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPOY OF THE PROCEEDING DATED 13/111/2014 OF THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY(FINANCE) FORWARDED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED IN LA NO.240/2014 OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P13 TRUE COPY OF GO(MS) NO.73/2013/PWD DATED 31/8/20131 OF THE GOVERNMENT
EXHIBIT P14 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF GUARATNEE PERIOD OF WORKS WITH EFFECT FROM 3/7/1992 AS PER GO(MS) NO.96/92/PW &T DATED 21/11/1992 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT
EXHIBIT P15 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 14.08.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4.
EXHIBIT P16 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 10.09.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!