Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P.K.Sunil vs P.R.Vijayan
2021 Latest Caselaw 6504 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6504 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2021

Kerala High Court
P.K.Sunil vs P.R.Vijayan on 23 February, 2021
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                          PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR

TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 4TH PHALGUNA, 1942

                    OP(C).No.490 OF 2021

IN I.A.NO.2/2020 IN O.S.NO.765/2020 OF I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
                      COURT,ERNAKULAM


PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF:

            P.K.SUNIL,
            AGED 50 YEARS,
            S/O KRISHNAN P.N, RESIDING AT PALIYAM THURUTHIL
            HOUSE, PIZHALA P.O.KADAMAKKUDY VILLAGE,
            ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682 027.

            BY ADV. SRI.T.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR

RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:

      1     P.R.VIJAYAN,
            68 YEARS,S/O RAMAN, PALIYAM THURUTHIL HOUSE,
            PIZHALA, PIZHALA P.O.KADAMAKKUDY VILLAGE,
            ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682 027.

      2     BABU,
            AGED 55 YEARS,
            S/O NARAYANAN, THAYYATHU VEETIL, VALIYA
            KADAMAKKUDY, KADAMAKKUDY VILLAGE, PIZHALA
            P.O.ERNAKULAM DISTRICT

      3     SUDHAKARAN,
            AGED 66 YEARS,
            S/O KRISHNAN, PALLATH HOUSE, PIZHALA, PIZHALA
            P.O.KADAMAKKUDY VILLAGE,
            ERNAKULAM DISTRICT ,PIN-682 027.

      4     DAVID,
            AGED 72 YEARS,
            S/O DEVASI, KADEPARAMBIL HOUSE, PIZHALA, PIZHALA
            P.O.KADAMAKKUDY VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,
            PIN-682 027.


     THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 O.P.(C)No.490/2021

                                       -:2:-




                     Dated this the 23rd day of February,2021

                               J U D G M E N T

The petitioner in this original petition is

the plaintiff in O.S.No.765/2020 before 1st

Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam. He filed the

suit for permanent injunction. Along with the

suit, he filed Ext.P5 [I.A.No.2/2020 in O.S.No.765/2020] seeking an order of temporary

injunction against the respondents/defendants

restraining them from transferring the suit

property.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel

for the petitioner/plaintiff that the court below

instead of passing an order of injunction chose to

issue notice to respondents and notices are yet to

be served. I.A.No.2/2020 in O.S.No.765/2020 is

stated to have been filed on 14.09.2020. The

apprehension expressed by the learned counsel for

the petitioner is that unless some orders

preventing the respondents from alienating the

property are issued, the petitioner will be put to

irreparable loss and injury.

3. This original petition is, therefore, O.P.(C)No.490/2021

filed for issue of a direction to the court below

to take up I.A.No.2/2020 forthwith and dispose of

it in accordance with law.

4. The fact that the court below chose to

issue notice to respondents and respondents are

yet to appear is no reason to delay disposal of

I.A.No.2/2020. From the nature of contentions

raised before the court below, it was only fair

and proper for the court to have passed orders on

I.A.No.2/2020 in accordance with law when it

noticed that service of notice on respondents was

being delayed.

5. I do not want to express any view on the

merits of the contentions raised by the

petitioner. In the nature of view which I propose

to take below, the notice to respondents is

dispensed with. I am of the opinion that it is

only fair and reasonable that the court below is

directed to dispose of I.A.No.2/2020 in

O.S.No.765/2020 within a period of two weeks from

the date of receipt of certified copy of this

judgment.

In the result, original petition is disposed

of directing the learned Munsiff,Ernakulam to take O.P.(C)No.490/2021

up I.A.No.2/2020 in O.S.No.765/2020 and pass

urgent orders after hearing the petitioner in

event of the respondents not appearing in the

proceeding in the meantime. If the respondents

appear within the time stipulated above, orders

may be passed after hearing them also. It is made

clear that the court below will be at full liberty

to pass any order of its choice in accordance with

law. Order on I.A.No.2/2020 shall not be delayed.

All pending interlocutory applications will

stand closed.

Sd/-

                                           T.V.ANILKUMAR,JUDGE

DST                                                                  //True copy/

                                                                    P.A.To Judge
 O.P.(C)No.490/2021






                         APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:



EXHIBIT P1           THE TRUE COPY OF THE TRUST DEED
                     NO.1801/67 OF NJARAKKAL S.R.O

EXHIBIT P2           THE TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.
                     879/1/8 OF NJARAKKAL S.R.O

EXHIBIT P3           TRUE COPY OF THE REPLAY NOTICE DATED

10.11.2020 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT

EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S. NO.

765/2020 PENDING BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM

EXHIBIT P5 THE TRUE COPY OF I.A.NO. 2/2020 IN O.S.

NO.765/2020

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter