Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6483 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 4TH PHALGUNA, 1942
WP(C).No.4699 OF 2021(J)
PETITIONER:
V.V.HARI,
AGED 60 YEARS
S/O VASU,
MANNUMADATHIL HOUSE,
TEEKOY P O, ERATTUPETTA,
MEENACHIL TALUK,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT
BY ADV. SRI.P.V.BABY
RESPONDENTS:
1 TEEKOY CO-OPERATIVE TEA FACTORY LTD. NO. K. 143
TEEKOY P O, MEENACHIL TALUK,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, -686580, REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR -IN-CHARGE.
2 ELECTORAL OFFICER/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(GENERAL),
MEENACHIL, PALA,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686589.
3 RETURNING OFFICER/ERATTUPETTA UNIT INSPECTOR
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETIES(GENERAL),
MEENACHIL, PALA,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686589.
4 STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION
3RD FLOOR, CO-BANK TOWERS,
VIKAS BHAVAN P O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695033.
OTHER PRESENT:
SR.GP K.P HARISH,
SC SRI.R.LAKSHMI NARAYAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P(C).4699/2021
2
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is a member of the first respondent/Co-operative Society
of planters. It consists of three types of members A, B and C. Final list
of membership shows that, it has 408 members. Election was notified
on 19.01.2021 and the date scheduled for election is 25.02.2021.
Election process is challenged on the basic ground that, there is
violation of Rule 35A(3A) of Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules as well
as Rule 35A(4). According to the petitioner, since the number of voters
is less than 500, separate notices should have been issued to each
member. Since it was not done, there was breach of Rule 35A(3A).
Further, the list did not contain the details of the father/mother of the
voter, hence in violation of Rule 35A(4). According to the learned
counsel for the petitioner, this is fatal. It is also contended that the
name of the father/husband, as the case may be, of the voter is not
mentioned in the voters list.
2. The present application is filed at the belated stage when the
election is proposed to be held after two days. It seems that, even
though, final list was published much earlier, petitioner came at the last
moment. Ext.P2 list seems to be taken from the existing available
records, based on which, earlier elections were conducted. It is also
seen that the petitioner has not filed any objection raising either of W.P(C).4699/2021
these contentions before the Electoral Officer or the Election
Commission.
3. Learned counsel for the Election Commission invited my
attention to Rule 35A(3A) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules to
contend that the sub-rule acts as a proviso to the earlier Rules and the
Statute has consciously given the option of service of notice as referred
to in Rule 35A(3A) of the Rules. Petitioner has also not pointed out that,
it has caused any prejudice to him or any other member. There is
nothing on record, at present, to show that, other members are not
informed about the process of election notification, which is seen
published in two prominent dailies, as submitted. Further, no such
grievance in writing was submitted to the Electoral Officer.
Having regard to this, I do not find any merit in the Writ Petition,
which is accordingly dismissed.
Sd/-
SUNIL THOMAS
Sbna JUDGE
W.P(C).4699/2021
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ELECTION
NOTIFICATION DATED 19/1/2021 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT PUBLISHED IN THE MANGALAM DAILY DATED 23.1.2021.
EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE FINAL VOTERS LIST PUBLISHED.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!