Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Thahira I. vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 6334 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6334 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2021

Kerala High Court
Thahira I. vs State Of Kerala on 22 February, 2021
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

                                 &

               THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA

  MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 3RD PHALGUNA, 1942

                       WP(Crl.).No.59 OF 2021


PETITIONER:

               THAHIRA I., AGED 39 YEARS
               W/O. SAKKIR, NILAVU, NAGARUKUZHI, PALAMKONAM P.O.,
               NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 607.

               BY ADV. SRI.V.VINAR

RESPONDENTS:

      1        STATE OF KERALA
               REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
               HIGH COURT OF KERALA, KOCHI-31.

      2        DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF (RURAL)
               OFFICE OF DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
               (RURAL), UNIVERSITY OF KERALA SENATE HOUSE CAMPUS,
               PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA- 695 033.

      3        STATION HOUSE OFFICER
               VENJARAMOODU POLICE STATION, SH1,
               VENJARAMMOODU, KERALA - 695 607.

      4        STATION HOUSE OFFICER
               VELLAMUNDA POLICE STATION, SH54, AREEKARA,
               VELLAMUNDA, VAYANAD, KERALA-670 731.

      5        HASHIM, S/O.USMAN ODAN, ODAN HOUSE, KELLOOR (P.O),
               PORUNNANNOOR, VAYANAD DISTRICT, KERALA-673 592
               (VELLAMUNDA, P.S LIMIT)



               SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.B.RAMANAND

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
22.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(Crl.).No.59 OF 2021               2




                                   JUDGMENT

Dated this the 22nd day of February, 2021 K. Vinod Chandran, J.

Petitioner is before this Court alleging that her daughter aged 19 years, the detenue, is under the wrongful confinement of the 5th respondent. It is also submitted before Court that the daughter of the petitioner had been duped and she had proceeded with the 5th respondent on his promise of marrying her. It was submitted that the 5th respondent is already married and has two children.

2. We directed the police to procure the custody of the alleged detenue and produce her before us. Today the detenue is before us. We have interacted with her in our chambers. She told us categorically that though she had gone with the 5th respondent, it was on the promise that he will marry her. In fact there was misrepresentation with respect to the earlier marriage, since the 5th respondent had told her that he was already divorced. The detenue has also submitted before us that she had physical relationship with the 5th respondent, which consent was only on the promise of his marrying her and on the information that he was already divorced.

3. The learned Senior Government Pleader submits that the daughter of the petitioner had appeared before the 3rd respondent, Station House Officer, along with the 5th respondent. Before

production before this Court, she was produced on the digital platform before the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Nedumangad. Before the Magistrate she had submitted that she had gone with the 5th respondent on her own free will. However, only later she came to know that the 5th respondent had not divorced his earlier wife and still the marriage subsists. It was in such circumstances that the daughter of the petitioner has expressed her desire to go with her mother.

4. The mother/petitioner also is present before us and the daughter of the petitioner is allowed to go with her mother. The police would first produce her before the Station House Officer, the 3rd respondent, who shall record her First Information Statement and from there she shall be sent for medical examination and further steps taken in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction, allowing the daughter of the petitioner, the detenue, to go along with the petitioner.

Sd/-

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE.

Sd/-

M.R. ANITHA, JUDGE.

sp/22/02/2021 //True Copy// P.A. To Judge

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1               TRUE COPY OF THE PART OF AADHAAR CARD OF
                         THE    DETENU    DATED   21.07.2012   BY
                         NO.994075185162.

EXHIBIT P2               THE   TRUE    COPY   OF   FIR    NO.246/2021
                         VENJARAMOOD     POLICE     STATION     DATED
                         09.02.2021.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter