Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6286 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL
MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 3RD PHALGUNA, 1942
Arb.A.No.2 OF 2005
AGAINST THE ORDER IN OPARB 101/2000 DATED 16-12-2003 OF DISTRICT
COURT & SESSIONS COURT,TRIVANDRUM
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS:
1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY
THE CHIEF ENGINEER (AIR FORCE), NO.2, D.C.AREA,
YESWANTPUR POST, BANGALORE-460 022.
2 M.K.CHITKARA, CHIEF ENGINEER AND
SOLE ARBITRATOR, PANEL OF ARBITRATOR (PUNE),
C/O. CWE KIRKEE, RANGA HILLS ROAD, KIRKEE P.O., PUNE.
SHRI P.VIJAYAKUMAR, ASG OF INDIA
SRI.L.S.SINDHU SREEHARI, CGC
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
M/S.FRONTIER AGENCIES, FLAT NO.87,
KAIRALI APARTMENTS, PANAMPILLI NAGAR, KOCHI.
THIS ARBITRATION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-02-
2021, ALONG WITH ARB.A.7/2005, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL
MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 3RD PHALGUNA, 1942
Arb.A.No.7 OF 2005
AGAINST THE ORDER IN OPARB 199/2000 DATED 16-12-2003 OF DISTRICT
COURT & SESSIONS COURT,TRIVANDRUM
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS:
1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY
THE CHIEF ENGINEER (AIR FORCE), NO.2, D.C.AREA,
YESWANTPUR POST, BANGALORE-460 022.
2 M.K.CHITKARA, CHIEF ENGINEER AND
SOLE ARBITRATOR, PANEL OF ARBITRATOR (PUNE),
C/O. CWE KIRKEE, RANGA HILLS ROAD, KIRKEE P.O., PUNE.
SHRI P.VIJAYAKUMAR, ASG OF INDIA
SRI.L.S.SINDHU SREEHARI, CGC
RESPONDENT/S:
M/S.FRONTIER AGENCIES
FLAT NO.87, KAIRALI APARTMENTS, PANAMPALY NAGAR,
KOCHI.
THIS ARBITRATION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-02-
2021, ALONG WITH ARB.A.2/2005, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
Arb.A.Nos.2 & 7 of 2005 3
JUDGMENT
Ravikumar, J.
These appeals are filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996. The former appeal is filed against the order
in O.P.(Arb.) No.101 of 2000 and the latter appeal is filed against the
order in O.P. (Arb.) No.199 of 2000, dated 16.12.2003 of the District
Court, Thiruvananthapuram. Both the appeals were admitted on
28.03.2005. But the fact is that service of notice to the respondents is
yet to be completed in both the appeals, despite the grant of several
opportunities to the appellants to ensure service of notice to the
respondents.
2. However, when these matters are taken up for
consideration today, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Solicitor
General of India appearing for the appellants that the appellants do
not wish to pursue the appeals and hence they can be dismissed as
not pressed. Recording the said submission these appeals are
dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
C.T.RAVIKUMAR JUDGE Sd/-
K.HARIPAL JUDGE
okb/22.02 //True copy// P.S. to Judge
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!