Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5722 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 28TH MAGHA,1942
WP(C).No.4050 OF 2021(E)
PETITIONER:
KERALA BOOKS & PUBLICATIONS SOCIETY
KAKKANAD P.O.ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 030,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
BY ADVS.
SMT.LATHA ANAND
SRI.M.N.RADHAKRISHNA MENON
SRI.K.R.PRAMOTH KUMAR
SRI.S.VISHNU (ARIKKATTIL)
SRI.ROHITH MOHAN
SRI.RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI B
SHRI.SIDHARTH P.S.
SHRI.GAUTHAM DEV C.P.
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (SPECIAL CIRCLE III)
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,
COMMERCIAL TAXES COMPLEX, ERNAKULAM-682 019.
2 THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT, KAKKANAD,
ERNAKULAM-682 030.
3 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX,
ERNAKULAM-682 013.
4 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX,
STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM,
CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, PIN-682 030.
5 THE K-VAT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
NO.39/6823, MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD, THEVARA JUNCTION,
THEVARA, PERUMANOOR, KOCHI, KERALA, PIN-682 015.
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT.THUSHARA JAMES, GOVT. PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
17.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.4050/2021 2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 17th day of February 2021
Heard both sides.
2. The petitioner, a registered dealer under the Kerala Value
Added Tax Act, was served with an assessment order by rejecting
the self assessment made by the petitioner for the year 2015-
2016. The statutory appeal filed by the petitioner is reportedly
pending with the 5th respondent. It is stated that the applications
for condonation of delay as well as stay are also pending
consideration of the 5th respondent and those are posted for
hearing in the month of March 2021.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that during the
pendency of the appeal, stay petition and the application for
condonation of delay, respondents have served revenue recovery
notice on the petitioner.
As the application for condonation of delay so also the
application for stay in the statutory appeal is pending, I deem it
appropriate to defer the proceedings of revenue recovery
pursuant to the assessment order till disposal of the application
for condonation of delay as well as application for stay if the
occasion so arises to consider it. It is expected of the learned
Tribunal to dispose of the application for condonation of delay and
if the occasion so arises, the application for stay within a period of
two months from the date of communication of this judgment.
Till then, revenue recovery proceedings initiated as per the
communication, Ext.P8, be kept in abeyance. The petitioner to
co-operate the learned Tribunal in disposal of the pending
applications as well as appeal.
This writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.M.BADAR
JUDGE
smp
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 9.3.2018 BY 1ST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 2.8.2018 IN WPC 26009 OF 2018
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30.5.2019
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BY PETITIONER IN FORM 31 OF K-VAT RULES
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION IN FORM 31 OF K-VAT RULES
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FOR EARLY HEARING OF THE CASES
EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SEEKING CONDONATION OF DELAY
EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 9.11.2020 ISSUED BY 4TH RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL.
True Copy
P.S to Judge
smp
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!