Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5692 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 28TH MAGHA,1942
WP(C).No.2272 OF 2021(H)
PETITIONERS:
1 MANJU S
AGED 37 YEARS
HST, NEW HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, NELLIMOODU, R/AT
PALAZHY, NHARAKKALA, PLAMOOTTUKADA P.O,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 122
2 SMITHA M.S,
UPST, NEW HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, NELLIMOODU, R/AT
ANUSREE, KALUNKIL, KANNARAVILA, NELLIMOODU P.O,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 524
3 SHALINI S.K,
UPST NEW HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, NELLIMOODU, AKSHAYA
KOCHOTTUKONAM, MARIYAPURAM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
PIN-695 122
BY ADVS.
SHRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH
SRI.K.P.ANTONY BINU
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA,REP BY SECRETARY
GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001
2 DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001
3 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 036.
4 DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, 695 121.
5 MANAGER,
NEW HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, NELLIMOODU,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 524
OTHER PRESENT:
T RAJASEKKHARAN NAIR SR GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
17.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.2272 OF 2021(H)
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 17th day of February 2021
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:-
"I) Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, to call for records and quash Ext.P14 order passed by Government disallowing petitioners claim for approval from date of appointments,declaring it to be illegal.
II) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to grant approval of appointment of petitioners made as per Exts.P1 to P3, with effect from the date of appointment, in modification of the date of approval granted with effect from 01.06.2011, within a time limit and grant consequential benefits.
III) Declare that the petitioners are entitled to have their appointment approved, with effect from the date of admitting to duty, as per Exts.P1 to P3 appointment orders, in modification of the approval granted with effect from 01.01.2011.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
the learned Government Pleader.
3. It is submitted that the petitioners were appointed
against the additional division vacancies, which arose in the
5th respondent school in the academic year 2008-09. It is
submitted that their appointments have been approved only WP(C).No.2272 OF 2021(H)
from 01.06.2011 on the ground that the Manager has not
executed a bond. It is submitted by the learned counsel for
the petitioners that in several identical cases, this Court had
specifically directed the approval of appointments in
sanctioned vacancies during the ban period deeming that
the Managers have executed bonds. However, in Ext.P14
Government Order also, the appointment of the petitioners
which is found to be otherwise liable to be approved is
refused to be approved till 01.06.2011 on the sole
contentions that the Manager has not executed a bond.
4. Having heard the learned Government Pleader
also, I am of the opinion that since in several cases this
Court has specifically directed the approval of appointments
of teachers appointed during the ban period by deeming
that the Managers have executed the bonds. The petitioners
appointments, which are otherwise in order as is evident
from Ext.P14 are also liable to be approved.
5. In the above view of the matter, there will be a WP(C).No.2272 OF 2021(H)
direction to the 4th respondent to approve the appointments
of the petitioners, which are found in Ext.P14 to have been
made against sanctioned vacancies by deeming that the
Manager has executed a bond as provided in G.O.(P)
No.10/10 G.Edn. Dated 12.01.2010. In case the Manager has
approached the Apex Court, the deeming shall be subjected
to the orders to be passed by the Apex Court. Appropriate
orders shall be passed by the 4 th respondent within a period
of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this
judgment. Monetary benefits, if any, found due shall be
released to the petitioners within a period of three months
thereafter.
This writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN
JUDGE Bng/17.02.2021 WP(C).No.2272 OF 2021(H)
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 01.06.2009 OF FIRST PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 03.06.2009 OF SECOND PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 09.06.2000 OF THIRD PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 23.01.2010 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT , REJECTING APPROVAL OF 1ST PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 28.1.2010 REJECTING APPROVAL IN THE CASE OF SECOND PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(P) NO. 10/10 G.EDN. DATED 12.01.2010.
EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF G.O(P) NO.199/2011 G.EDN DATED 01.10.2011.
EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 2.3.2014 BEFORE THE CHIEF MINISTER/GOVERNMENT.
EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 22.11.2015 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 10.03.2020 SUBMITTED BY 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT.
EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 12.3.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE SECOND PETITIONER BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT
EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 10.03.2020 SUBMITTED BY 3RD PETITIONER BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT.
WP(C).No.2272 OF 2021(H)
EXHIBIT P13 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 09.07.2020 IN W.P.(C)NO. 13216/2020
EXHIBIT P14 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 23.12.2020 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!