Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5559 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 27TH MAGHA,1942
Crl.MC.No.213 OF 2021(F)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 5733/2019 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
OF FIRST CLASS - II, PERAMBRA
CRIME NO.180/2019 OF ATHOLY POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 AND 2:
1 MASHOOD R.T.,
AGED 39 YEARS
S/O. LATE ABOOBAKCER, AMMANDIPARAMBU, PERUVAYAL
DESOM, KOZHIKODE - 673008.
2 FATHIMA
AGED 53 YEARS
W/O. LATE ABOOBAKCER, AMMANDIPARAMBU, PERUVAYAL
DESOM, KOZHIKODE - 673008.
BY ADV. SRI.P.ANOOP (MULAVANA)
RESPONDENTS/STATE, DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM, 682031.
2 FOUSIYA,
D/O. LATE MAJEED, CHALIL MEETHAL, VELUR AMSOM DESOM,
KOYILANDY TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673305.
R2 BY ADV. A.CHANDRA BABU
OTHER PRESENT:
SR.PP.C.N.PRABHAKARAN
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
16.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
CRL.M.C.NO.213 OF 2021
2
ORDER
Dated this the 16th day of February 2021
Petitioners are accused Nos. 1 & 2 in Crime
No.180/2019 registered at the Atholi Police Station,
Kozhikode Rural for the offence punishable under
Section 498-A & 406 r/w Section 34 of IPC, now
pending as C.C.No.5733/2019 on the files of the
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Perambra.
The de facto complainant, at whose instance the
crime was registered, is the 1 st petitioner's wife and is
arrayed as the 2nd respondent herein. Annexure-A2
affidavit has been filed by the 2 nd respondent stating
that the matrimonial dispute, which had compelled
her to submit the complaint leading to registration of
the crime, has been resolved amicably and hence, she
has no subsisting grievance against the petitioners.
2. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor also,
who, on instructions, submits that the petitioners CRL.M.C.NO.213 OF 2021
have no criminal antecedents.
3. Having considered the gravity of the
offences alleged, nature of the injury caused and
having perused the affidavit filed by the 2 nd
respondent, the contents of which are submitted to
be true and voluntary, I am satisfied that the dispute
is settled and no public interest is involved in this
matter. Moreover, in view of the settlement,
possibility of the criminal proceedings ending in
conviction is remote. As such, continuance of the
proceedings will amount to an abuse of process of
court and hence, in view of the legal position set out
by the Honourable Supreme Court in Madan Mohan
Abbot v. State of Punjab [(2008) 4 SCC 582] and
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another
[(2012) 10 SCC 303], there is no impediment in
granting the relief sought.
In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed.
Annexure-1 Final Report in crime No.180/2019 of
Atholi Police Station, Kozhikode Rural and further CRL.M.C.NO.213 OF 2021
proceedings in C.C.No.5733/2019 on the files of the
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Perambra are
quashed.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN
JUDGE
NB CRL.M.C.NO.213 OF 2021
APPENDIX PETITIONERS'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CC 5733/2019 OF THE JFCM - II PERAMBRA, ARISING FROM CRIME NO.180/2019 OF THE ATHOLI POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!