Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

A.K.Anjana vs Smt.Saudamini
2021 Latest Caselaw 5457 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5457 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2021

Kerala High Court
A.K.Anjana vs Smt.Saudamini on 15 February, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                          PRESENT

           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH

  MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021/26TH MAGHA,1942

     Con.Case(C).No.1463 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 33142/2015

           AGAINST JUDGMENT DATED 15.03.2019 IN

       WP(C) 33142/2015(P) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA


PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

           A.K.ANJANA, AGED 47 YEARS,
           WIFE OF RATHEESHKUMAR K.V.,
           UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT,
           S.V.V.HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PALEMADU,
           NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 331.

           BY ADVS.
           SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED
           SRI.M.SAJJAD

RESPONDENT/4TH RESPONDENT:

           SMT.SAUDAMINI, AGE AND FATHERS NAME
           NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
           DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, WANDOOR,
           MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 328.

           BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. RASHMI K.M.

     THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 15.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 COC No.1463/2020
                                       :2 :



                                JUDGMENT

~~~~~~~~~

Dated this the 15th day of February, 2021

In judgment dated 15.03.2019 in W.P.(C)

No.33142/2015, this Court noted the order dated 16.02.2018

issued by the District Educational Officer and found that the

main grievance of the petitioner stands redressed.

Accordingly, without adjudicating on merits of the case, the

writ petition was disposed of directing the 4th respondent to

take steps to make available the monetary benefits due to the

petitioner from the order dated 16.02.2018 of the DEO, as

expeditiously as possible.

2. This contempt case has been filed by the petitioner

alleging that though she has been paid some benefits

pursuant to the orders of this Court, arrears of salary for the

period from 01.08.2008 to 14.07.2010 were not disbursed to

her and it amounts to contempt of court.

3. The learned Government Pleader opposed the

contempt case filing affidavit on behalf of the 1 st respondent. COC No.1463/2020

The learned Government Pleader submitted that the

Headmistress of the School examined the attendance register

in respect of the petitioner for disbursing arrears of salary and

it was found that the petitioner has not signed the attendance

register during the period from 01.08.2008 to 14.07.2010.

Therefore, except the arrears of salary for the said period, all

other service benefits were extended to the petitioner.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would urge

that this Court has already held in earlier judgments that the

retrenchment of the petitioner from service was unsustainable

and unjustifiable and therefore she will be eligible for the

salary for the aforesaid period even if the petitioner has not

been worked.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned Government Pleader.

6. By judgment dated 15.03.2019, this Court disposed

of W.P.(C) No.33142/2015 without any adjudication of merits

based on Annexure-I order passed by the DEO. The DEO

has ordered in Annexure-I that the petitioner will be entitled to COC No.1463/2020

eligible salary for her service from 01.08.2008. The DEO has

found that since the petitioner has not rendered actual service

during the period from 01.08.2008 to 14.07.2010, the

petitioner is not eligible for salary for the said period.

7. This Court finds that the respondent has passed

orders pursuant to the judgment dated 15.03.2019 in W.P.(C)

No.33142/2015. The grievance regarding non-payment of

arrears of salary from 01.08.2008 to 14.07.2010 will have to

be agitated independently. As far as the direction contained in

the judgment in W.P.(C) No.33142/2015 is concerned, this

Court is of the opinion that the direction is substantially

complied with.

Accordingly, leaving open the remedy of the

petitioner to seek arrears of salary for the period from

01.08.2008 to 14.07.2010, this Contempt of Court Case is

dismissed.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH, JUDGE

aks/15.02.2021 COC No.1463/2020

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

ANNEXURE I TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE DEO, WANDOOR VIDE NO.A3/2426/15 DATED 16.02.2018.

ANNEXURE II CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.

(C)NO.33142/2015 DATED 15.03.2019.

ANNEXURE III TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION VIDE LETTER NO.A3/1798/19 DATED 19.11.2019 OBTAINED UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005.

ANNEXURE IV TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER NO.7/1996/2020 DATED 19.08.2020.

ncd

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter