Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5449 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 26TH MAGHA,1942
Crl.MC.No.5806 OF 2020(E)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CC 892/2018 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF
FIRST CLASS -I,KOZHIKODE
CRIME NO.438/2018 OF Chevayur Police Station , Kozhikode
PETITIONERS:
1 ABISH ANIL KUMAR
AGED 37 YEARS
S/O.ANIL KUMAR MONON, BHAVANA, PALLIKKUNNU P.O.,
MADAMBALLI ROAD, KANNUR-670 004.
2 ANIL KUMAR MENON,
AGED 67 YEARS
S/O.KUNHIKANNAN NAIR, BHAVANA, PALLIKKUNNU P.O.,
MADAMBALLI ROAD, KANNUR-670 004.
3 SOBHA ANILKUMAR,
AGED 57 YEARS
W/O.ANIL KUMAR MENON, BHAVANA, PALLIKKUNNU P.O.,
MADAMBALLI ROAD, KANNUR-670 004.
BY ADVS.
SHRI.HARISH R. MENON
SRI.K.T.SHYAMKUMAR
PRASANTH A.G.
NIMMY SHAJI
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2 NIMISHA NAMBIAR ANJALI
AGED 31 YEARS
W/O.ABISH ANIL KUMAR, RESIDING AT MOHANAM, SHENOY
COLONY, NELLIKKAVU ROAD, KARAPARAMBA P.O., CHEVAYOOR
POLICE STATION LIMIT, KOZHIKODE-673 010.
R2 BY ADV. S.NIRMAL
Crmc 5806/2020 2
PP T.R.RENJITH
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
15.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crmc 5806/2020 3
V.G.ARUN, J.
===========================
Crl.M.C.No.5806 of 2020
===========================
Dated this the 15th day of February, 2021
ORDER
Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.438 of 2018
registered at the Chevayur Police Station for offences punishable
under Sections 498A, 406 r/w 34 of IPC, now pending as
C.C.No.892 of 2018 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate
Court-I, Kozhikode. The de facto complainant at whose instance
the crime was registered is the 2nd respondent. Annexure B
affidavit has been filed by the 2 nd respondent stating that the
matrimonial dispute has been settled and that she has no
subsisting grievance against the petitioners.
2. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor also, who, on
instructions, submits that the petitioners have no criminal
antecedents.
3. Having considered the gravity of the offences alleged,
nature of the injury caused and having perused the affidavit filed
by the 2nd respondent, the contents of which are submitted to be
true and voluntary, I am satisfied that the dispute is settled and
that no public interest is involved in this matter. Moreover, in
view of the settlement, possibility of the criminal proceedings
ending in conviction is remote. As such, continuance of the
proceedings will amount to an abuse of process of court and
hence, in view of the legal position set out by the Honourable
Supreme Court in Madan Mohan Abbot v. State of Punjab
[(2008) 4 SCC 582] and Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and
another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], there is no impediment in
granting the relief sought.
4. In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed. The proceedings in
C.C.No.892 of 2018 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate
Court-I, Kozhikode is quashed.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN JUDGE
lgk
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.22504/2019 DATED 17.09.2020.
ANNEXURE B THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT HEREIN.
ANNEXURE C THE FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE INVESTIGATION OFFICER.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!