Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5382 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 26TH MAGHA,1942
WP(C).No.3773 OF 2021(V)
PETITIONER:
MANAGER,
NADVATHUL ISLAM UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL,
P.O. NADVATH NAGAR,
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 526
BY ADV. SRI.P.M.PAREETH
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001
2 DIRECTOR GENERAL OF EDUCATION,
JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014
3 DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 524
4 ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
THURAVOOR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 532
OTHER PRESENT:
SR GP NISHA BOSE
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
15.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C).No.3773/2021
2
JUDGMENT
1. The writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:-
"1) A writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, direction or order calling for the records leading to Exhibit P2 and quash the same.
2) A writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, direction or order commanding the respondents to approve the appointment of Smt.Aneesa K.P as LPST w.e.f. 06.06.2019 as per Exhibit P1 appointment order issued by the petitioner within a time frame.
3) A direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P3 revision petition and Exhibit P4 application for condonation of delay, submitted by the petitioner within a time frame after hearing the petitioner."
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Government Pleader.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner, who is the Manager of an
aided school has preferred Exhibit P3 revision petition under
Rule 8A of Chapter XIVA KER against the order of the AEO
refusing to approve the appointment of Smt.Aneesa K.P. as
LPST in the school. It is submitted that Exhibit P3 revision W.P.(C).No.3773/2021
has been filed along with Exhibit P4 application for
condonation of delay and the same are liable to be considered
in accordance with law.
4. Having heard the learned Government Pleader also, there will
be a direction to the 2 nd respondent to take up Exhibit P3
revision petition and Exhibit P4 application for condonation of
delay with notice to the petitioner as well as the concerned
teacher and after hearing them, within a period of two months
from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made
clear that the hearing, as directed, can be conducted through
any appropriate means, including through video conferencing.
The writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
Anu Sivaraman, Judge
sj W.P.(C).No.3773/2021
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 06.06.2019 IN RESPECT OF SMT. ANEESA K.P
EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.
C/2611/2020/KDS DATED 19.10.2020 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION DATED 02.02.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN RESPECT OF SMT. ANEESA K.P.
EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 02.02.2021 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN RESPECT OF SMT. ANEESA K.P.
True copy
PS to Judge
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!