Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5225 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 23RD MAGHA,1942
MACA.No.1558 OF 2019(F)
APPEAL AGAINST THE AWARD IN OP(MV) 447/2016 DATED 18-12-2018 OF
MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL , IRINJALAKUDA
APPELLANT/3RD RESPONDENT:
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.,
POOTHOLE, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, REGIONAL
OFFICE, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADVS.
SRI.GEORGE CHERIAN (SR.)
SMT.K.S.SANTHI
RESPONDENTS:
1 RAMLAL,
AGED 59 YEARS, S/O.SANKARAN KUTTY, AYIRATTU HOUSE,
EDAVILANGU DESOM, VILLAGE AND P.O., KODUNGALLUR
TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 671.
2 SHEELA,
AGED 54 YEARS, W/O.RAMLAL, AYIRATTU HOUSE, EDAVILANGU
DESOM, VILLAGE AND P.O., KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR
DISTRICT - 680 671.
3 REDHULAL,
AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.RAMLAL, AYIRATTU HOUSE, EDAVILANGU
DESOM, VILLAGE AND P.O., KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR
DISTRICT - 680 671.
R1-3 BY ADV. SRI.V.BINOY RAM
THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
12.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
MACA.No.1558 OF 2019
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 12th day of February 2021
This appeal has been filed by the Insurance Company,
challenging the award dated 18.12.2018 in O.P.(MV) No.447/2016 on the file
of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Irinjalakuda. A young man, named,
Sri.Sidhulal, aged 24 years met with an accident on 07.02.2016, when the
motor bike in which he was travelling, was hit by a stage carriage vehicle
which had been insured with the appellant. Sri.Sidhulal succumbed to the
injury on 08.02.2016. The legal representatives, who are the parents of the
deceased and his brother, filed O.P.(MV) No.447/2016 claiming a
compensation of Rs.40,00,000/-. The Tribunal, by order dated 18.12.2018,
granted compensation of a sum of Rs. 20,58,100/-. Aggrieved by the order
of the Tribunal the Insurance Company has come up in appeal.
2. Heard Sri.George Cherian, Senior Advocate instructed by
Smt. K.S.Santhi, Advocate, on behalf of the appellant and Sri. V. Binoy Ram
on behalf of the respondents.
3. The only contention that has been raised by the counsel for
the appellant is that the amount awarded by the Tribunal towards the loss of
dependency is highly excessive.
4. I have considered the contentions of the Senior Advocate MACA.No.1558 OF 2019
and having gone through the evidence on record before the Tribunal, I am
not in a position to accept the contentions of the Senior Counsel. The
claimants had put forward a contention that the deceased was earning
Rs.30,000/- per month and that he was having Diploma in Mechanical
Engineering and had also obtained trade certificate in mechanical servicing
from the State Board of Vocational Higher Secondary Examinations. In the
absence of documentary evidence regarding income, the Tribunal found that
the income of the deceased at the time of his death can be fixed at
Rs.13,000/- per month and having regard to the fact that he was less than
40 years of age at the time of death, a 40% increase in the monthly income
can be granted. It was on this basis that an amount of Rs.19,66,000/- was
awarded under the head loss of dependency.
I am of the opinion that the method adopted by the Tribunal
cannot be faulted in any manner. No other grounds have been made out
warranting an interference by this Court with the award passed by the
Tribunal. The appeal fails and is dismissed. In the circumstances there will
be no order as to costs.
T.R.RAVI JUDGE
SMF
//TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!