Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ajitha K vs The Returning Officer
2021 Latest Caselaw 5201 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5201 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 February, 2021

Kerala High Court
Ajitha K vs The Returning Officer on 12 February, 2021
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN

     FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 23RD MAGHA,1942

                       W.P.(C) No.3025 OF 2021(C)


PETITIONER/S:

                AJITHA K.
                AGED 42 YEARS
                W/O. SRENDRAN.C., PPK BHAVAN, PATTANUR, THALASSERY
                TALUK, KANUR 670 595.

                BY ADV. SRI.PRANOY K.KOTTARAM

RESPONDENT/S:

      1         THE RETURNING OFFICER
                ELECTION TO THE PATTANUR VILLAGE VANITHA CO-OPERATIVE
                SOCIETY KOLAYAD UNIT INSPECTOR, OFFICE OF THE ASST.
                REGISTRAR (GENERAL), KUTHUPARAMBA, KANNUR 670 643.

      2         THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
                OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TALAP, KANNUR
                670 002.

      3         CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
                POLICE STATION, MATTANNUR, KANNUR, 670702.

      4         THE SECRETARY,
                PATTANUR VILLAGE VANITHA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY
                LIMITED, NO. C. 1254, PATTANUR (P.O.), KANNUR 670
                595.


OTHER PRESENT:

                SRI GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE (SR) FOR PETITIONER ; SRI
                SUNIL NATH N.B- GOVERNMENT PLEADER ; SRI LAKSHMI
                NARAYAN - R1 ; SRI SIVARAMAN P.L - R4

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
12.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.3025 OF 2021(C)

                                      2

                                JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is the President of the managing

committee of Pattanur Village Vanitha Co-operative Society Ltd.,

has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Consitution of

India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1 st respondent

to verify the validity of the identity card of each voter with the

Form 6B register maintained in the Society, in the presence of the

4th respondent Secretary in the election to the managing

committee of the Pattanur Village Vanitha Co-operative Society

Ltd, scheduled to be conducted on 14.02.2021. The petitioner has

also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents

to take all necessary steps for conducting fair and transparent

election to the new managing committee of Pattanur Village

Vanitha Co-operative Society.

2. Going by the averments in the writ petition, election to

the new managing committee of the Society in question is

scheduled to be held on 14.02.2021. In connection with the

previous election to the managing committee of the Society, the

Co-operative Arbitration Court (Northern), Kozhikode by order

dated 10.01.2014, found certain irregularities in the conduct of

election. The petitioner submitted Ext.P1 representation dated W.P.(C) No.3025 OF 2021(C)

30.01.2021 before the 1st respondent Returning officer; the 2 nd

respondent Superintendent of Police, Kannur; and also the 3 rd

respondent Circle Inspector of Police, Mattannur, Kannur and

thereafter, moved this writ petition seeking the aforesaid reliefs.

3. On 05.02.2021, when this writ petition came up for

admission, the learned Government Pleader was directed to get

instructions.

4. On 11.02.2021, the learned Standing Counsel for State

Co-operative Election Commission took notice on admission for the

1st respondent Returning Officer. The learned Government Pleader

took notice on admission for respondents 2 and 3 and urgent

notice on admission by e-mail was ordered to 4 th respondent,

returnable by 12.02.2021. The learned counsel for the petitioner

was directed to furnish the e-mail ID and also a scanned copy of

this writ petition to the Registry.

5. Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, the

learned Standing Counsel for the State Co-operative Election

Commission for the 1st respondent Returning Officer, the learned

Government Pleader for respondents 2 and 3 and also Sri. Adv. P.

L. Sivaraman, the learned counsel for the 4th respondent.

6. The Kerala Police Act, 2011 is enacted to consolidate W.P.(C) No.3025 OF 2021(C)

and amend the law relating to the establishment, regulation,

powers and duties of the Police Force in the State of Kerala and for

matters connected therewith and incidental thereto. Chapter II of

the Act deals with duties and functions of Police. Section 3 of the

Act deals with general duties of Police. As per Section 3, the Police,

as a service functioning category among the people as part of the

administrative system shall, subject to the Constitution of India

and the laws enacted thereunder, strive in accordance with the

law, to ensure that all persons enjoy the freedoms and rights

available under the law by ensuring peace and order, integrity of

the nation, security of the State and protection of human rights.

Section 4 of the Act deals with functions of Police. As per Section

4, the Police Officers shall, subject to the provisions of the Act,

perform the functions enumerated in clauses (a) to (s) of Section

4. As per clause (a), the Police Officers shall enforce the law

impartially; and as per clause (b), the Police Officers shall protect

the life, liberty, property, human rights and dignity of all persons in

accordance with the law.

7. Lord Denning in 'The Due Process of law' [First Indian

Reprint 1993, Page 102] has described the role of the Police thus;

"In safeguarding our freedoms, the police play vital role. Society for its defence needs a well-led, well- W.P.(C) No.3025 OF 2021(C)

trained and well-disciplined force or police whom it can trust, and enough of them to be able to prevent crime before it happens, or if it does happen, to detect it and bring the accused to justice.

The police, of course, must act properly. They must obey the rules of right conduct. They must not extort confessions by threats or promises. They must not search a man's house without authority. They must not use more force than the occasion warrants."

8. In Manohar Lal Sharma v. Principal Secretary

[(2014) 2 SCC 532] the Apex Court held that, one of the

responsibilities of the police is protection of life, liberty and

property of citizens. The investigation of offences is one of the

important duties the police has to perform. The aim of

investigation is ultimately to search for truth and bring the

offender to the book. The Apex Court reiterated the said principle

in Ankush Maruti Shinde v. State of Maharashtra [(2019) 15

SCC 470].

9. The learned Standing Counsel for the State Co-

operative Election Commission would submit that the 1st

respondent Returning Officer shall take necessary steps to ensure

free and fair election to the managing committee of the Society in

question. Videograph of the process of the election can be

arranged at the request of the petitioner, on condition that the W.P.(C) No.3025 OF 2021(C)

entire expense has to be met by the petitioner herself.

10. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, would

submit that the 3rd respondent Circle Inspector of Police shall take

necessary steps for the smooth conduct of the election, taking

note of the directions contained in Circular No.28/2013 of the

State Police Chief dated 20.11.2013.

11. In such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of

by directing respondents 2 and 3 to ensure smooth conduct of

election to the managing committee of Pattanur Village Vanitha

Co-operative Society Ltd., which is scheduled to be held on

14.02.2021, strictly in accordance with the directions contained in

the Circular dated 20.11.2013 issued by the State Police Chief. The

1st respondent Returning Officer shall ensure that there is no bogus

voting or impersonation of voters, by having the identity of the

voters verified with reference to the relevant records maintained in

the Society, the identity card issued in Form 6A or and any one of

the document specified in the Explanation to Rule 35A(6)(n)(ix) of

the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules, and also Form 6B register

maintained in the Society.

If the petitioner makes a written request before the 1 st

respondent Returning Officer to videograph the process of election, W.P.(C) No.3025 OF 2021(C)

at her own expenses, the said request shall be favourably

considered by the said respondent. Such videography shall be

permitted without causing any manner of disturbance to the voters

and officials or in any manner interfering with the balloting done in

the polling booths.

Sd/-

ANIL K. NARENDRAN JUDGE MIN W.P.(C) No.3025 OF 2021(C)

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1                   TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION
                             SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED
                             30.01.2021.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter