Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5089 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 22ND MAGHA,1942
WP(C).No.33908 OF 2019(K)
PETITIONER:
POKKASEERAKATH MARIYUMMA,
AGED 66 YEARS
D/O S.V. KHALID, RAHMATH MANZIL, KORAN PEEDIKA,
PARIYARAM AMSOM, CHITHAPILE POYIL (P.O.),
KANNUR DISTRICT - PIN - 670 502.
BY ADVS.
SRI.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL
SRI.P.S.BINU
RESPONDENTS:
1 UNION OF INDIA,
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
MINISTRY OF SHIPPING, ROAD TRANSPORT AND
HIGHWAYS (DEPARTMENT OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND
HIGHWAYS), NEW DELHI - 110 001.
2 THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, G-5 AND 6, DWARAKA
SECTOR, NEW DELHI - 110 075.
3 THE PROJECT DIRECTOR,
THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA,
ARUMUGHAN COLONY, CHANDRA NAGAR, PALAKKAD, PIN
- 678 007.
4 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
PUBLIC WORKS (D) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.
5 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
CIVIL STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670002.
WP(C)No.33908 of 2019
2
6 THE SEPCIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LAND
ACQUISITION),
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA,
THALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670 141.
7 THE SPECIAL THAHASILDAR (LAND ACQUISITION),
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, UNIT NO.2,
THALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670 141.
8 ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, ROAD SUB DIVISION,
THALASSERY, PIN - 670 101.
9 ADDL.R9. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, PROJECT
IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, 34/743-B, VAISHNAVAM,
BEHIND POPULAR VEHICLE MARUTHI SHOWROOM, CIVIL
STATION.P.O., KOZHIKKODE DISTRICT, PIN-673020.
(ADDL. R9 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 23-01-
2020 IN IA 1/2020 IN WP(C) 33908/2019).
R1 BY ADV. SHRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR, ASG OF INDIA
R3 BY ADV. SRI.B.G.BIDAN CHANDRAN
R3 BY ADV. SRI.E.C.KURIAKOSE
R4-8 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER
SRI HANIL KUMAR M.H.- SPL GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
11.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C)No.33908 of 2019
3
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is in possession and ownership of 12.50 cents
of land in Sy.No.180/5A (R.S.No.180/6) in Kadannappalli Amsom
Desom of Kannur District, along with a two storied residential
building bearing No.KPP XII/581. The petitioner has filed this writ
petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a
writ of mandamus commanding the 6th respondent Special
Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), National Highway Authority
of India, Thaliparamba, Kannur, to consider Ext.P6 representation
dated 12.11.2019 made by the petitioner, in accordance with
law.
2. The 6th respondent has filed a counter affidavit,
opposing the relief sought for in this writ petition. The 3 rd
respondent has also filed a counter affidavit, wherein the
provision under Section 3G of the National Highways Act, 1956 is
pointed out.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the
learned Assistant Solicitor General of India, appearing for the 1 st
respondent, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing WP(C)No.33908 of 2019
for respondents 4 to 8 and also the learned Standing Counsel for
the National Highway Authority of India, appearing for
respondents 2, 3 and 9.
4. The grievance of the petitioner is inadequacy of
compensation awarded by the 6th respondent Land Acquisition
Officer. The petitioner submitted Ext.P6 representation dated
12.11.2019, which was rejected by Ext.P7 reply dated
19.11.2019.
5. In case the petitioner is feeling aggrieved by the
compensation awarded by the 6th respondent in LAC No.2585, in
respect of the property in question, it is for the petitioner to avail
the statutory remedy provided under Section 3G(5) of the
National Highways Act. The inadequacy of the compensation in
the award passed in LAC No.2585 cannot be considered by the 6 th
respondent, based on Ext.P6 representation made by the
petitioner.
In such circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled for the
relief sought for in this writ petition and the writ petition is
accordingly dismissed; however, without prejudice to the right of WP(C)No.33908 of 2019
the petitioner to avail the statutory remedy provided under
Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956, by
approaching the competent authority.
Sd/-
ANIL K. NARENDRAN JUDGE
yd WP(C)No.33908 of 2019
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF PROPERTY TAX ISSUED FROM KADANNAPPALLI-PANAPPUZHA PANCHAYAT DT. 23-11-2018.
EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DT. 07-02- 2019.
EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF VALUATION STATEMENT ISSUED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DT. 26-10-2019.
EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF THE DETAILED VALUATION OF THE HOUSE NO. KPP-XIII-581 WITH PLAN OBTAINED BY RTI ACT, DT. 26-10-2019.
EXHIBIT P5 COPY OF THE DETAILED VALUATION OF THE HOUSE NO. KPP-XIII-580 WITH PLAN OBTAINED BY RTI ACT, DT. 26-10-2019.
EXHIBIT P6 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER DT. 12-11-2019.
EXHIBIT P7 COPY OF THE REPLY ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT DT. 19-11-2019.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A. TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!