Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Against The Judgment In Wpc ... vs By Adv. Sri.Mahesh V Ramakrishnan
2021 Latest Caselaw 4944 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4944 Ker
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2021

Kerala High Court
Against The Judgment In Wpc ... vs By Adv. Sri.Mahesh V Ramakrishnan on 10 February, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

    WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 21ST MAGHA,1942

          Con.Case(C).No.1192 OF 2018(S) IN WP(C). 17680/2017

 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 17680/2017 DATED 17-04-2018 OF HIGH
                         COURT OF KERALA


PETITIONER

               PARENT TEACHERS ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT TRIBAL
               SCHOOL,
               ECHIPPARA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT,
               MUHAMMED RIYAS P.M., S/O. MAJEED, AGED 35 YEARS, P.O.
               ECHIPPARA, THIRSSUR-680304.

               BY ADV. SRI.MAHESH V RAMAKRISHNAN

RESPONDENTS:

      1        SRI.PAUL ANTONY
               CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, STATE OF KERALA,
               GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

      2        A.SHAJAHAN IAS
               SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
               GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

               R1-2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER,SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE



     THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 10.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
                                         2

Con.Case(C).No.1192 OF 2018(S) IN WP(C). 17680/2017




                                JUDGMENT

Dated this the 10th day of February 2021

This contempt petition is filed complaining

that directives contained in the judgment in

W.P.(C)No.17680/2017 dated 17.04.2018 is not

complied with.

2. However, today when the matter is taken up,

learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

the directions are complied with. Therefore, I do

not find any reason to pursue the contempt case any

further.

The Contempt of Court case is closed,

accordingly.

Sd/-

SHAJI P.CHALY JUDGE Hmh

Con.Case(C).No.1192 OF 2018(S) IN WP(C). 17680/2017

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 30.05.2017 IN W.P.(C) NO.17680/2017

ANNEXURE A2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 17.04.2018 IN W.P. (C)NO.17680/2017

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter